IMOST: Interactive Multiple Objective System Technique

An interactive multiple objective system technique (IMOST) is investigated to improve the flexibility and robustness of multiple objective decision making (MODM) methodologies. The interactive concept provides a learning process about the system, whereby the decision maker can learn to recognize good solutions, the relative importance of factors in the system, and then design a high-productivity and zero-buffer system instead of optimizing a given system. This interactive technique provides integration-oriented, adaptation and dynamic learning features by considering all possibilities of a specific domain of MODM problems which are integrated in logical order. It encompasses the decision-making processes of formulating problems, constructing a model, solving the model, testing/examining its solution, and improving/reshaping the model and its solution in a specific problem domain. Although IMOST deals with multiple objective programming problems, it also provides some valuable orientation of integrated system methodologies.

[1]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[2]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[3]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  IFLP-II: a decision support system , 1993 .

[4]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  OPTIMIZING GIVEN SYSTEMS vs. DESIGNING OPTIMAL SYSTEMS: THE DE NOVO PROGRAMMING APPROACH , 1990 .

[5]  R. S. Laundy,et al.  Multiple Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation and Application , 1989 .

[6]  H. Zimmermann Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions , 1978 .

[7]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Mathematical Programming: Methods and Applications , 1995 .

[8]  C. Carlsson,et al.  A parametric approach to fuzzy linear programming , 1986 .

[9]  Wan Seon Shin,et al.  Interactive multiple objective optimization: Survey I - continuous case , 1991, Comput. Oper. Res..

[10]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  Decision Support Systems Using Reference Point Optimization , 1989 .

[11]  D. J. White,et al.  A Bibliography on the Applications of Mathematical Programming Multiple-objective Methods , 1990 .

[12]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Decision-making in fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[13]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[14]  R. Ackoff The Future of Operational Research is Past , 1979 .

[15]  G. Mitra,et al.  Linear, Integer, Separable and Fuzzy Programming Problems: A Unified Approach towards Reformulation , 1988 .

[16]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  Optimal system design with multiple criteria: De Novo programming approach , 1986 .

[17]  Danny Samson,et al.  Subjective Aspects of the Art of Decision Analysis: Exploring the Role of Decision Analysis in Decision Structuring, Decision Support and Policy Dialogue , 1986 .

[18]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  An interactive weighted Tchebycheff procedure for multiple objective programming , 1983, Math. Program..

[19]  C. Hwang,et al.  Interactive fuzzy linear programming , 1992 .

[20]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Formulating the mess: The role of decision aids in problem formulation , 1983 .

[21]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Resurrecting the Future of Operational Research , 1979 .

[22]  C. Hwang,et al.  Possibilistic linear programming for managing interest rate risk , 1993 .

[23]  S. Martin,et al.  “Redesigning the future” , 1987, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[24]  Herbert A. Simon Two Heads Are Better than One: The Collaboration between AI and OR , 1987 .