POSITION-INDEPENDENT INTERACTION FOR LARGE HIGH-RESOLUTION DISPLAYS

Since large, high-resolution displays (LHRD) are capable of visualizing a large amount of very detailed information, users have to move around in front of these displays to gain either in-depth knowledge or an overview. However, conventional input devices such as mouse and keyboard restrict users' mobility by requiring a stable surface on which to operate. We present a flexible and intuitive interaction technique based on an infrared laserpointer, a technique that allows identical use from any point and distance. In particular, our laserpointer interaction satisfies the demands of LHRD in the areas of mobility, accuracy, and interaction speed. The solution presented is technically designed as a generic interaction library whose flexibility and general applicability was verified by using it on two very different systems – a planar 221″ Powerwall and a curved 360° panoramic display. Furthermore, a comparative evaluation study with 16 participants was conducted on the Powerwall to compare the performances of a conventional mouse and our laserpointer by means of a unidirectional tapping test at varying distances (ISO 9241-9). The statistically significant performance advantage of the mouse (13%) appears marginal considering the intuitive and direct mode of interaction in using the laserpointer and the flexibility gained by its use, both of which are fundamental requirements for LHRDs. In comparison to previous systems and evaluations, we were able to reduce the laserpointer’s performance lag by over 50%. This result is achieved mainly by our precise tracking method, the minimized delay, and the effective jitter compensation.

[1]  Heinrich Müller,et al.  Interaction with a projection screen using a camera-tracked laser pointer , 1998, Proceedings 1998 MultiMedia Modeling. MMM'98 (Cat. No.98EX200).

[2]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Dan R. Olsen,et al.  Laser pointer interaction , 2001, CHI.

[4]  Wolfgang Stuerzlinger,et al.  Laser Pointers as Collaborative Pointing Devices , 2002, Graphics Interface.

[5]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  An Evaluation of Two Input Devices for Remote Pointing , 2001, EHCI.

[6]  Xing Chen,et al.  Lumipoint: multi-user laser-based interaction on large tiled displays , 2002 .

[7]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[8]  P. Fitts,et al.  INFORMATION CAPACITY OF DISCRETE MOTOR RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  Florian Vogt,et al.  Interacting with the big screen: pointers to ponder , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[10]  Bernd Hamann,et al.  A practical system for laser pointer interaction on large displays , 2005, VRST '05.

[11]  Sarah A. Douglas,et al.  Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard , 1999, CHI '99.

[12]  Jeffrey Nichols,et al.  Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices , 2002, CHI.

[13]  Choon Hong Peck Useful parameters for the design of laser pointer interaction techniques , 2001, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  I. Scott MacKenzie,et al.  Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  Ian Mackenzie,et al.  Fitts' law as a performance model in human-computer interaction , 1992 .