Identifying careless responses in survey data.

When data are collected via anonymous Internet surveys, particularly under conditions of obligatory participation (such as with student samples), data quality can be a concern. However, little guidance exists in the published literature regarding techniques for detecting careless responses. Previously several potential approaches have been suggested for identifying careless respondents via indices computed from the data, yet almost no prior work has examined the relationships among these indicators or the types of data patterns identified by each. In 2 studies, we examined several methods for identifying careless responses, including (a) special items designed to detect careless response, (b) response consistency indices formed from responses to typical survey items, (c) multivariate outlier analysis, (d) response time, and (e) self-reported diligence. Results indicated that there are two distinct patterns of careless response (random and nonrandom) and that different indices are needed to identify these different response patterns. We also found that approximately 10%-12% of undergraduates completing a lengthy survey for course credit were identified as careless responders. In Study 2, we simulated data with known random response patterns to determine the efficacy of several indicators of careless response. We found that the nature of the data strongly influenced the efficacy of the indices to identify careless responses. Recommendations include using identified rather than anonymous responses, incorporating instructed response items before data collection, as well as computing consistency indices and multivariate outlier analysis to ensure high-quality data.

[1]  D. Marlowe,et al.  A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. , 1960, Journal of consulting psychology.

[2]  F. Samejima Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores , 1968 .

[3]  D P Schultz,et al.  The human subject in psychological research. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  E. Spelke,et al.  Skills of divided attention , 1976, Cognition.

[5]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[6]  D. Paulhus Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[7]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[8]  H. Gough CPI, California Psychological Inventory : administrator's guide , 1987 .

[9]  R. Raskin,et al.  A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  D. A. Beach,et al.  Identifying the Random Responder , 1989 .

[11]  S. Hathaway,et al.  MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring , 1989 .

[12]  R L Greene,et al.  Criteria for assessing inconsistent patterns of item endorsement on the MMPI: rationale, development, and empirical trials. , 1989, Journal of clinical psychology.

[13]  M. Campbell,et al.  Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? A randomised trial. , 1990, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[14]  M. J. Harris,et al.  Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analysis , 1991 .

[15]  T. Widiger,et al.  Detection of random responding on the MMPI-2 : utility of F, back F, and VRIN scales , 1991 .

[16]  R. Baer,et al.  MMPI-2 Random Responding Indices: Validation Using a Self-Report Methodology. , 1992 .

[17]  K A Kiehl,et al.  Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  J. Bermúdez,et al.  Personality Psychology in Europe , 1997 .

[19]  B. Kinder,et al.  Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: development and initial validation. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[20]  R. Baer,et al.  Detection of random responding on the MMPI-A. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[21]  Timothy R. Hinkin,et al.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[22]  L. R. Goldberg A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models , 1999 .

[23]  N. Schwarz Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. , 1999 .

[24]  M. Birnbaum Psychological experiments on the internet , 2000 .

[25]  D. Weiss,et al.  The Impact of Anonymity on Responses to Sensitive Questions , 2000 .

[26]  Tom Buchanan,et al.  Potential of the Internet for personality research , 2000 .

[27]  David E. Wiley,et al.  The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement , 2001 .

[28]  J. E. Kurtz,et al.  Semantic Response Consistency and Protocol Validity in Structured Personality Assessment: The Case of the NEO-PI-R , 2001, Journal of personality assessment.

[29]  David E. Wiley,et al.  Socially Desirable Responding: The Evolution of a Construct , 2001 .

[30]  K. Douglas,et al.  Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[31]  W. Hofstee,et al.  The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement. , 2001 .

[32]  Roland S. Moore,et al.  Survey confidentiality vs anonymity: Young men's self-reported substance use. , 2002 .

[33]  M. Larsen,et al.  The Psychology of Survey Response , 2002 .

[34]  Michael E. Clark,et al.  Detection of back random responding: effectiveness of MMPI-2 and Personality Assessment Inventory validity indices. , 2003, Psychological assessment.

[35]  B. Muthén,et al.  Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[36]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[37]  John A. Johnson Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories. , 2005 .

[38]  Hangwoo Lee,et al.  Privacy, Publicity, and Accountability of Self‐Presentation in an On‐Line Discussion Group* , 2006 .

[39]  Carol M. Woods Careless Responding to Reverse-Worded Items: Implications for Confirmatory Factor Analysis , 2006 .

[40]  Fritz Drasgow,et al.  Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring? , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[42]  B. Muthén,et al.  Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study , 2007 .

[43]  K. Montgomery Generation Digital: Politics, Commerce, and Childhood in the Age of the Internet , 2007 .

[44]  Gregory J. Boyle,et al.  Personality measurement and testing , 2008 .

[45]  P. Costa,et al.  The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) , 2008 .

[46]  G. Matthews,et al.  The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment. Volume 1, Personality theories and models , 2008 .

[47]  B. Muthén,et al.  Running Head : MODELS AND STRATEGIES FOR FMA 1 Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis : Two examples concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders , 2009 .

[48]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  Multitasking across generations: Multitasking choices and difficulty ratings in three generations of Americans , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[49]  Angela P. Wetzel Internet, mail, and mixed‐mode surveys: The tailored design method , 2010 .

[50]  Elizabeth M. Poposki,et al.  Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys , 2012 .

[51]  B. Muthén,et al.  Models and Strategies for Factor Mixture Analysis: An Example Concerning the Structure Underlying Psychological Disorders , 2013, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.