The local cell curvature guides pseudopodia towards chemoattractants

Many eukaryotic cells use pseudopodia for movement towards chemoattractants. We developed a computer algorithm to identify pseudopodia, and analyzed how pseudopodia of Dictyostelium cells are guided toward cAMP. Surprisingly, the direction of a pseudopod is not actively oriented toward the gradient, but is always perpendicular to the local cell curvature. The gradient induces a bias in the position where the pseudopod emerges: pseudopodia more likely emerge at the side of the cell closer to the gradient where perpendicular pseudopodia are pointed automatically toward the chemoattractant. A mutant lacking the formin dDia2 is not spherical but has many invaginations. Although pseudopodia still emerge at the side closer to the gradient, the surface curvature is so irregular that many pseudopodia are not extended toward cAMP. The results imply that the direction of the pseudopod extension, and therefore also the direction of cell movement, is dominated by two aspects: the position at the cell surface where a pseudopod emerges, and the local curvature of the membrane at that position.

[1]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  The Ordered Extension of Pseudopodia by Amoeboid Cells in the Absence of External Cues , 2009, PloS one.

[2]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Analysis of cell movement by simultaneous quantification of local membrane displacement and fluorescent intensities using Quimp2. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[3]  Pascale G. Charest,et al.  Spatiotemporal Regulation of Ras Activity Provides Directional Sensing , 2008, Current Biology.

[4]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  R. Kay,et al.  Surface area regulation: underexplored yet crucial in cell motility , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[6]  P. Iglesias,et al.  PIP3-Independent Activation of TorC2 and PKB at the Cell's Leading Edge Mediates Chemotaxis , 2008, Current Biology.

[7]  Christopher Janetopoulos,et al.  Directional sensing during chemotaxis , 2008, FEBS letters.

[8]  W. Rappel,et al.  Receptor noise and directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[9]  R. Kay,et al.  Changing directions in the study of chemotaxis , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[10]  Roger Lui,et al.  Exploring the control circuit of cell migration by mathematical modeling. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[11]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Four key signaling pathways mediating chemotaxis in Dictyostelium discoideum , 2008, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Navigating through models of chemotaxis. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[14]  M. Ueda,et al.  Stochastic signal processing and transduction in chemotactic response of eukaryotic cells. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Natalie Andrew,et al.  Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[16]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  Guanylyl cyclase protein and cGMP product independently control front and back of chemotaxing Dictyostelium cells. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[17]  T. Bretschneider,et al.  The Diaphanous-related formin dDia2 is required for the formation and maintenance of filopodia , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  T. Meyer,et al.  A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[19]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  Joachim Goedhart,et al.  Sensitization of Dictyostelium chemotaxis by phosphoinositide-3-kinase-mediated self-organizing signalling patches , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[21]  S. Diez,et al.  Dynamic Actin Patterns and Arp2/3 Assembly at the Substrate-Attached Surface of Motile Cells , 2004, Current Biology.

[22]  Steven A. Crone,et al.  The Bound Leading the Bound Target-Derived Receptors Act as Guidance Cues , 2002, Neuron.

[23]  T. Misteli The concept of self-organization in cellular architecture , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  E. Butcher,et al.  Chemokines in tissue-specific and microenvironment-specific lymphocyte homing. , 2000, Current opinion in immunology.

[25]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm , 1999, Current Biology.

[26]  M. Baggiolini Chemokines and leukocyte traffic , 1998, Nature.

[27]  D. Soll,et al.  Effects of cAMP on single cell motility in Dictyostelium , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  Van Haastert Sensory adaptation of Dictyostelium discoideum cells to chemotactic signals , 1983, The Journal of cell biology.

[29]  J. Schnakenberg,et al.  G. Nicolis und I. Prigogine: Self‐Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems. From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, Toronto 1977. 491 Seiten, Preis: £ 20.–, $ 34.– , 1978 .

[30]  Zigmond Sh Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors , 1977, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  I. Prigogine,et al.  Formative Processes. (Book Reviews: Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems. From Dissipative Structures to Order through Fluctuations) , 1977 .

[32]  V. Nanjundiah,et al.  Signal input for a chemotactic response in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Jonathan Franca-Koh,et al.  Leading-edge research: PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 and directed migration , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[34]  S. Zigmond,et al.  ABILITY OF POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUKOCYTES TO ORIENT IN GRADIENTS OF CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS , 2003 .

[35]  H. Bourne,et al.  A chemical compass. , 2002, Nature.