iSCSI and CIFS Network Disks for RAID0/RAID 1 Configurations

In this paper, we have tested the impact of the network disk configuration to the system performances. The performance analysis compares two network disk configurations, practically evaluating two different network protocols using identical physical disk configurations. One network drive is configured to operate as an iSCSI block device, while the other operates as a network share disk using CIFS protocol. Testing procedure is based on the use of DiskSpd tool and encompasses measurement of the flow rate, number of the operations and the average response time. Based on the results, iSCSI shows significantly higher flow rates and lower delay values as the size of the data block grows. In smaller blocks, the differences between iSCSI and CIFS are almost negligible.

[1]  Prashant J. Shenoy,et al.  A Performance Comparison of NFS and iSCSI for IP-Networked Storage , 2004, FAST.

[2]  Dirk Grunwald,et al.  A performance analysis of the iSCSI protocol , 2003, 20th IEEE/11th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, 2003. (MSST 2003). Proceedings..

[3]  Christopher Hertel.  Implementing CIFS: The Common Internet File System , 2003 .

[4]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Introduction to redundant arrays of inexpensive disks (RAID) , 1989, Digest of Papers. COMPCON Spring 89. Thirty-Fourth IEEE Computer Society International Conference: Intellectual Leverage.

[5]  Julian Satran,et al.  Design of the iSCSI protocol , 2003, 20th IEEE/11th NASA Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, 2003. (MSST 2003). Proceedings..

[6]  David L. Black,et al.  Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) Protocol (Consolidated) , 2014, RFC.

[7]  David Robinson,et al.  Network File System (NFS) version 4 Protocol , 2003, RFC.