Vehicle Braking is Slower under Dual-Task Conditions: Evidence for “Central” Interference

Participants attempted to perform 2 concurrent tasks superimposed on a car-following task in a driving simulator. In the choice response task, they responded either manually or vocally to whether a visual or auditory stimulus was presented once or twice. In the braking task, they depressed a brake pedal to the onset of the lead car's brake lights. The onset delay between the choice and braking stimuli was varied. This manipulation revealed that the braking reaction was greatly affected by concurrent performance of the choice task, although there were no or very small specific effects on it by the stimulus and response modalities of the choice task. The results demonstrate that even a well-practiced, “simple” task such as vehicle braking is subject to dual-task slowing and appear to be due to central, not peripheral, interference.

[1]  A. Sanders Towards a model of stress and human performance. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[2]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference , 1992 .

[4]  J Miller,et al.  Discreteness and continuity in models of human information processing. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[5]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. , 1998 .

[6]  I. Brown,et al.  Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  C. L. M. The Psychology of Attention , 1890, Nature.

[8]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[10]  A. Welford THE ‘PSYCHOLOGICAL REFRACTORY PERIOD’ AND THE TIMING OF HIGH‐SPEED PERFORMANCE—A REVIEW AND A THEORY , 1952 .

[11]  H Summala,et al.  Cognitive load and detection thresholds in car following situations: safety implications for using mobile (cellular) telephones while driving. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[13]  D. Strayer,et al.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.