Topology optimisation of spinal interbody cage for reducing stress shielding effect

The stress shielding effect is an event in which the replacement implant limits the load transferred to bone and the ineffective stress in the vertebrae causes bony growth to cease. In the present study, a 3D finite element L4–L5 model was developed and subjected to a 1200 N compression preload. Five groups of muscle forces were applied on L4 under flexion–extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Topology optimisation was employed for reducing the stress shielding effect by removing the ineffective material from the design domain. The optimised design was designed with polyaryletheretherketone (PEEK) titanium and cortical materials to encounter the shielding response. The stress responses show that the new design increased the stress magnitude by at least 17.10, 18.11 and 18.43% in 4 Nm of flexion–extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, respectively. In conclusion, the material factor did not significantly alter the stress magnitude, but volume was the key factor in reducing the stress shielding effect.

[1]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Effects of preload on load displacement curves of the lumbar spine. , 1977, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[2]  A Shirazi-Adl,et al.  Biomechanics of the Lumbar Spine in Sagittal/Lateral Moments , 1994, Spine.

[3]  L E Claes,et al.  Influence of varying muscle forces on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro study. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  J. Kitoh,et al.  Etiology of Idiopathic Scoliosis: Computational Study , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Load Transfer Mechanisms in Cylindrical Interbody Cage Constructs , 2002, Spine.

[6]  Martijn van Dijk,et al.  The Effect of Cage Stiffness on the Rate of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An In Vivo Model Using Poly(L-Lactic Acid) and Titanium Cages , 2002, Spine.

[7]  L Claes,et al.  Mechanically simulated muscle forces strongly stabilize intact and injured upper cervical spine specimens. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Farhad Nabhani,et al.  Computer modelling and stress analysis of the lumbar spine , 2002 .

[9]  M. Pearcy,et al.  Stress analysis of interbody fusion--finite element modelling of intervertebral implant and vertebral body. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  Stephen J. Ferguson,et al.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[11]  Chia-Ying Lin,et al.  Interbody Fusion Cage Design Using Integrated Global Layout and Local Microstructure Topology Optimization , 2004, Spine.

[12]  G. Duda,et al.  Stress Shielding in Box and Cylinder Cervical Interbody Fusion Cage Designs , 2005, Spine.

[13]  Edward C. Benzel,et al.  Biomechanics of the Spine , 2005 .

[14]  Zheng-Cheng Zhong,et al.  Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine with a new cage using a topology optimization method. , 2006, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  Kunwoo Lee,et al.  Biomechanical study of lumbar spine with dynamic stabilization device using finite element method , 2007, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Fabio Galbusera,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  L. Claes,et al.  The relation between the instantaneous center of rotation and facet joint forces - A finite element analysis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.