Toward More Effective Antecedent Strategies for Environmental Programs

Antecedent strategies such as information and prompts when used to promote proenvironmental practices, i.e., energy and water conservation, recycling and litter control, use of mass transit or energy saving driving behaviors, are generally believed to be ineffective, particularly in comparison to consequence strategies such as feedback and use of various rewards. A review of forty-one representative studies in behavioral, environmental research indicated that when attention is given to such factors as specificity, proximity, convenience of the behavior, and salience that antecedent strategies can be effective, albeit still considerably less effective than consequence strategies. However, far more striking in the review was the poor design of antecedent strategies, the use primarily of the written medium alone, and the generally singular presentation of the intervention. The development of more effective antecedent strategies is important from a policy perspective since they are generally less expensive to implement than consequence strategies, or may be combined with consequence strategies to optimize outcome. Incorporating concepts and practices from communications and social diffusion theories, as well as more fully exploiting behavioral modeling were discussed as bases for developing more effective antecedent strategies. Examples of media-based and local, personal contact approaches are given to illustrate the potential ofmore » more effective antecedent strategies.« less

[1]  J. Kagel,et al.  Effects of monetary rebates, feedback, and information on residential electricity conservation. , 1978 .

[2]  Skills training in a cardiovascular health education campaign. , 1980, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  E. Scott Geller,et al.  Promoting Paper Recycling on a University Campus , 1975 .

[4]  E S Geller,et al.  Facilitating paper recycling: effects of prompts, raffles, and contests. , 1976, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[5]  T. Risley,et al.  Anti-litter procedures in an urban high-density area. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[6]  R. Kohlenberg,et al.  A behavioral analysis of peaking in residential electrical-energy consumers. , 1976, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[7]  E. Geller,et al.  Waste Receptacle Designs as Interventions for Litter Control , 1979 .

[8]  S. Hayes,et al.  Reducing residential electrical energy use: payments, information, and feedback. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[9]  Stuart H. Mann,et al.  Attitudes and Conditions for Cooperation in a Paper Recycling Program , 1977 .

[10]  Marc Wayner,et al.  The Induction of Sustained Recycling Behavior Through the Foot-in-the-Door Technique , 1976 .

[11]  R. Houten,et al.  An analysis of public posting in reducing speeding behavior on an urban highway. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[12]  John M. Darley,et al.  Energy conservation techniques as innovations, and their diffusion , 1978 .

[13]  S B Fawcett,et al.  Some promising dimensions for behavioral community technology. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[14]  W. Finnie Field Experiments in Litter Control , 1973 .

[15]  R. Kohlenberg,et al.  Reinforcement and rate of litter depositing. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[16]  R. Clark,et al.  An experimental analysis of anti-litter procedures. , 1971, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[17]  R. Winett,et al.  Behavioral ecology: Contingency management of consumer energy use , 1975 .

[18]  E. Geller Evaluating Energy Conservation Programs: Is Verbal Report Enough? , 1981 .

[19]  M. Baltes,et al.  Application and evaluation of strategies to reduce pollution: Behavioral control of littering in a football stadium. , 1976 .

[20]  Leonard A. Jason,et al.  Prompting dog owners to pick up dog droppings , 1979 .

[21]  Jon S. Bailey,et al.  Newspaper Recycling Behavior , 1976 .

[22]  Peter B. Everett,et al.  The effects of a token reinforcement procedure on bus ridership. , 1974, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[23]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  E. Geller,et al.  Instructions as a Determinant of Paper-Disposal Behaviors , 1976 .

[25]  George Semb,et al.  Resource recovery: Use of a group contingency to increase paper recycling in an elementary school. , 1977 .

[26]  Robert N. Rothstein Television feedback used to modify gasoline consumption , 1980 .

[27]  R. Winett,et al.  Comment on "Psychological research and energy policy." , 1981 .

[28]  Richard A. Winett,et al.  Psychological framework for energy conservation in buildings: Strategies, outcomes, directions , 1979 .

[29]  Jon S. Bailey,et al.  Newspaper Recycling , 1979 .

[30]  M. Palmer,et al.  An experimental analysis of electricity conservation procedures. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[31]  R. Winett Prompting Turning-Out Lights in Unoccupied Rooms , 1977 .

[32]  Paul D. Luyben,et al.  Recycling Beverage Containers on a College Campus , 1979 .

[33]  M. Wolf,et al.  Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[34]  M. P. Maloney,et al.  Ecology: Let's hear from the people: An objective scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. , 1973 .

[35]  John D. Cone,et al.  Environmental Problems/Behavioral Solutions , 1980 .

[36]  J. Bailey,et al.  Reducing Children's Littering on a Nature Trail , 1975 .