Effects of soil reinforcement on uplift resistance of buried pipeline

Abstract Pipeline failure caused by low uplift resistance in soil is a serious environmental and economic issue. Hence, having access to higher uplift resistance of pipeline through soil reinforcement has received considerable attention. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of performing geogrid to increase the uplift resistance of buried pipelines. To examine the effect of burial depth, pipe diameter, length of geogrid layers and the number of geogrid layers on the peak uplift resistance (PUR) of loose sand, 33 small-scale tests were performed in the laboratory. Results of laboratory tests reveal that depth of burial and pipe diameter have a direct effect on the PUR results. The findings show that the number of geogrid layers does not have a remarkable influence on PUR values. While the residual PUR values are of interest, for the same length of geogrid, the use of two layers of geogrid instead of one is advantageous. To verify the experimental results, 33 experiments were back analyzed using “PLAXIS 3D TUNNEL” program. It was found that experimental and numerical results are in good agreement.

[1]  G.J.M. Schotman,et al.  Soil Response for Pipeline Upheaval Buckling Analyses: Full-Scale Laboratory Tests and Modelling , 1990 .

[2]  Marius Loen Ommundsen.  Upheaval buckling of buried pipelines , 2011 .

[3]  T. Newson,et al.  Finite Element Modelling of Upheaval Buckling of Buried offshore Pipelines in Clayey Soils , 2006 .

[4]  K. A. Kassim,et al.  The influence of soil reinforcement on the uplift response of symmetrical anchor plate embedded in sand , 2013 .

[5]  T. C Maltby,et al.  An investigation into upheaval buckling of buried pipelines—II. Theory and analysis of experimental observations , 1995 .

[6]  A. S. Vesić.  BREAKOUT RESISTANCE OF OBJECTS EMBEDDED IN OCEAN BOTTOM , 1971 .

[7]  A. Selvadurai.  Enhancement of the Uplift Capacity of Buried Pipelines by the Use of Geogrids , 1989 .

[8]  G. L. Sivakumar Babu,et al.  Simulation of Soil Nail Structures using PLAXIS 2D , 2009 .

[9]  D. Robert,et al.  Upheaval Buckling Assessment Based on Pipeline Features , 2011 .

[10]  Bolton,et al.  Upheaval buckling resistance of pipelines buried in clayey backfill , 2008 .

[11]  E. Davis,et al.  The behaviour of anchor plates in sand , 1982 .

[12]  F. Kulhawy,et al.  Uplift Force‐Displacement Response of Buried Pipe , 1985 .

[13]  M. Finch.  Upheaval Buckling and Floatation of Rigid Pipelines : The Influence of Recent Geotechnical Research on the Current State of the Art. , 1999 .

[14]  D. White,et al.  Centrifuge modelling of upheaval buckling in sand , 2001 .

[15]  Edward A. Dickin.  UPLIFT RESISTANCE OF BURIED PIPELINES IN SAND , 1994 .

[16]  Malcolm D. Bolton,et al.  The uplift resistance of pipes and plate anchors buried in sand. , 2008 .

[17]  M. Randolph,et al.  The limiting pressure on a circular pile loaded laterally in cohesive soil , 1984 .

[18]  Andrew Dawson,et al.  Combined use of geocell reinforcement and rubber–soil mixtures to improve performance of buried pipes , 2012 .

[19]  Toshinori Kawabata,et al.  A Simulation on Uplift Resistance of Buried Pipe by DEM , 2001 .

[20]  Mohammad Javad Vahdatirad,et al.  Modeling of the Uplift Response of Buried Pipelines , 2009 .