Phytoplankton and environmental variability in a dam regulated temperate estuary

Phytoplankton composition and production are highly unpredictable within an estuary, due to the high variability of forcing factors, such as freshwater flow, salinity, nutrients and light. The Guadiana estuary has shown sharp inter-annual differences in freshwater flow, related to variable precipitation, which is expected to affect nutrient loadings, light availability and phytoplankton succession. Water retention due to dam construction will further enhance changes in river flow and ecosystem dynamics. The main goal of the present study was to describe and relate phytoplankton succession and environmental conditions, namely nutrients and light, in the Guadiana upper estuary (south-western Iberian Peninsula), a dam regulated temperate estuary. From March 2004 to October 2005, water samples were collected in three stations along a longitudinal transect covering the upper estuary. Several water variables were determined and phytoplankton composition was studied through inverted and epifluorescence microscopy. A typical freshwater phytoplankton succession was observed, from a diatom spring bloom to cyanobacteria dominance in the summer, and a second diatom bloom in the autumn. Neither nutrients nor light availability seemed to be related to the observed succession, especially the seasonal variation of diatom abundance. During summer, nutrient concentrations (especially Si) were high and non-limiting, whilst light was available in the mixing layer. However, diatoms were present in low numbers. Grazing pressure was probably responsible for the regulation of diatom seasonal succession in the Guadiana upper estuary, which should be addressed in future studies.

[1]  J. W. G. Lund,et al.  Freshwater Algae: Their Microscopic World Explored , 1995 .

[2]  S. Wofsy,et al.  A simple model to predict extinction coefficients and phytoplankton biomass in eutrophic waters1 , 1983 .

[3]  H. Paerl.  A comparison of cyanobacterial bloom dynamics in freshwater, estuarine and marine environments , 1996 .

[4]  J. T. Turner,et al.  Primary productivity and phytoplankton size fraction dominance in a temperate North Atlantic estuary , 1983 .

[5]  H. Utermöhl.  Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik , 1958 .

[6]  D. B. Nedwell,et al.  Sources of nitrogen used for denitrification and nitrous oxide formation in sediments of the hypernutrified Colne, the nutrified Humber, and the oligotrophic Conwy estuaries, United Kingdom , 2006 .

[7]  Val H. Smith,et al.  Light and Nutrient Effects on the Relative Biomass of Blue-Green Algae in Lake Phytoplankton , 1986 .

[8]  J. Cloern.  PHYTOPLANKTON BLOOM DYNAMICS IN COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS' A REVIEW WITH SOME GENERAL LESSONS FROM SUSTAINED INVESTIGATION OF SAN FRANCISCO , 1996 .

[9]  G. Cabeçadas,et al.  Nutrient Dynamics and Productivity in Three European Estuaries , 1999 .

[10]  F. A. Richards,et al.  The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water , 1963 .

[11]  J. Raymont.  Chapter 5 – Phytoplankton Crop , 1980 .

[12]  C. Sobrino,et al.  Occurrence of microcystins along the Guadiana estuary , 2004, Limnetica.

[13]  P. Qian,et al.  Shift from P to N limitation of phytoplankton growth across the Pearl River estuarine plume during summer , 2001 .

[14]  L. R. Mur,et al.  Cyanobacteria in the environment , 1999 .

[15]  L. Chícharo,et al.  Use of a hydrotechnical infrastructure (Alqueva Dam) to regulate planktonic assemblages in the Guadiana estuary: Basis for sustainable water and ecosystem services management , 2006 .

[16]  R. Sterner.  The Role of Grazers in Phytoplankton Succession , 1989 .

[17]  A. J. Southward,et al.  Plankton and Productivity in the Oceans , 1964 .

[18]  C. Nozais,et al.  Annual cycle of microalgal biomass in a South African temporarily-open estuary: nutrient versus light limitation , 2001 .

[19]  K. Baker,et al.  Relation between photosynthetically available radiation and total insolation at the ocean surface under clear skies1 , 1987 .

[20]  M. Troussellier,et al.  Standing stock and dynamics of picophytoplankton in the Thau Lagoon (northwest Mediterranean coast) , 1996 .

[21]  James E. Cloern,et al.  Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity in estuaries , 1987 .

[22]  Gordon A. Riley,et al.  Phytoplankton of the North Central Sargasso Sea, 1950–521 , 1957 .

[23]  J. Cloern.  The relative importance of light and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth: a simple index of coastal ecosystem sensitivity to nutrient enrichment , 1999, Aquatic Ecology.

[24]  Chris Langdon,et al.  On the causes of interspecific differences in the growth-irradiance relationship for phytoplankton. Part I. A comparative study of the growth-irradiance relationship of three marine phytoplankton species: Skeletonema costatum, Olisthodiscus luteus and Gonyaulax tamarensis , 1987 .

[25]  D. Kirkwood.  Stability of solutions of nutrient salts during storage , 1992 .

[26]  V. Brotas,et al.  Variability in Chlorophyll and Phytoplankton Composition in an Estuarine System , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[27]  E. Orive,et al.  Size distribution of algal pigments and phytoplankton assemblages in a coastal—estuarine environment: contribution of small eukaryotic algae , 2003 .

[28]  M. Brzezinski,et al.  THE Si:C:N RATIO OF MARINE DIATOMS: INTERSPECIFIC VARIABILITY AND THE EFFECT OF SOME ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES 1 , 1985 .

[29]  Ulrich Sommer,et al.  Plankton ecology, succession in plankton communities , 1989 .

[30]  D. Roelke,et al.  A model of phytoplankton competition for limiting and nonlimiting nutrients: Implications for development of estuarine and nearshore management schemes , 1999 .

[31]  C. Rocha,et al.  Role of transient silicon limitation in the development of cyanobacteria blooms in the Guadiana estuary, south-western Iberia , 2002 .

[32]  Y. Sin,et al.  Seasonal variations of size-fractionated phytoplankton along the salinity gradient in the York River estuary, Virginia (USA) , 2000 .

[33]  J. Kromkamp,et al.  Possibility of Net Phytoplankton Primary Production in the Turbid Schelde Estuary (Sw Netherlands) , 1995 .

[34]  P. Froneman.  Response of the Plankton to Three Different Hydrological Phases of the Temporarily Open/closed Kasouga Estuary, South Africa , 2002 .

[35]  E. Carpenter,et al.  Intraspecific Differences in Nitrate Half‐Saturation Constants for Three Species of Marine Phytoplankton , 1971 .

[36]  André Morel,et al.  Relation between total quanta and total energy for aquatic photosynthesis1 , 1974 .

[37]  I. Izaguirre,et al.  Feeding selectivity of Corbicula fluminea (Bivalvia) on natural phytoplankton , 1995, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  G. Underwood,et al.  Primary Production by Phytoplankton and Microphytobenthos in Estuaries , 1999 .

[39]  R. Holmes,et al.  THE SECCHI DISK IN TURBID COASTAL WATERS1 , 1970 .

[40]  W. R. Taylor.  Freshwater Algae , 1933, Botanical Gazette.

[41]  M. Sieracki,et al.  Autotrophic picoplankton dynamics in a Chesapeake Bay sub-estuary , 1989 .

[42]  B. Cole,et al.  Biomass and productivity of three phytoplankton size classes in San Francisco Bay , 1986 .

[43]  Manfred Ehrhardt,et al.  Methods of seawater analysis , 1999 .

[44]  R. Bergfeld,et al.  Das Leben im Wassertropfen; ein Bestimmungsbuch für die Mikroflora und Mikrofauna des Süßwassers von H. Streble und D. Krauter. Kosmos Verlag Franckh'sche Verlagshandlung, Stuttgart 1973; 352 Seiten mit 1700 Abbildungen. Ganzl. geb. DM 38,50 , 1974 .

[45]  R. Wetzel,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation of resource limitation in Chesapeake Bay , 1999 .

[46]  C. Humborg,et al.  Hydrological Alterations and Marine Biogeochemistry: A Silicate Issue? , 2000 .

[47]  A. Andersson,et al.  Effect of temperature and light on the growth of micro- nano- and pico-plankton: impact on algal succession , 1994 .

[48]  Peter A. Jumars,et al.  Concepts in Biological Oceanography: An Interdisciplinary Primer , 1993 .

[49]  S. Levitus.  Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean , 1982 .

[50]  P. Herman,et al.  Living in the twilight: estimating net phytoplankton growth in the Westerschelde estuary (The Netherlands) by means of an ecosystem model (MOSES) , 1994 .

[51]  H. Paerl,et al.  Regulation of estuarine primary production by watershed rainfall and river flow , 1993 .

[52]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Non-determinism to probability, or N : P in the community ecology of phytoplankton : Nutrient ratios , 1999 .

[53]  A. Barbosa,et al.  Nutrients, light and phytoplankton succession in a temperate estuary (the Guadiana, south-western Iberia) , 2005 .

[54]  Claudio Rossi,et al.  Spatial and temporal variations of the inherent and apparent optical properties in a shallow coastal lake. , 2005, Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology.

[55]  U. Sommer.  Nutrient competition experiments with periphyton from the Baltic Sea , 1996 .

[56]  E. Esteves,et al.  Status of the Guadiana Estuary (south Portugal) during 1996-1998: An ecohydrological approach , 2001 .

[57]  Xabier Irigoien,et al.  Light Limitation and Distribution of Chlorophyll Pigments in a Highly Turbid Estuary: the Gironde (SW France) , 1997 .

[58]  D. B. Nedwell,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of phytoplanktonic primary production, nutrient and light availability along a turbid, eutrophic UK east coast estuary (the Colne Estuary) , 2002 .

[59]  Timothy R. Parsons,et al.  A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis , 1984 .

[60]  F. Johnson,et al.  Green, bluegreen and diatom algae: Taxonomie differences in competitive ability for phosphorus, silicon and nitrogen , 1986, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[61]  Ulrich Sommer,et al.  The Role of Competition for Resources in Phytoplankton Succession , 1989 .

[62]  Terry E. Whitledge,et al.  Does nitrogen or silicon limit phytoplankton production in the Mississippi River plume and nearby regions , 1992 .

[63]  V. Istvánovics,et al.  The role of Gloeotrichia echinulata in the transfer of phosphorus from sediments to water in Lake Erken , 1993, Hydrobiologia.