The quest for generalizations over consonants: Asymmetries between consonants and vowels are not the by-product of acoustic differences

Consonants and vowels may play different roles during language processing, consonants being preferentially involved in lexical processing, and vowels tending to mark syntactic constituency through prosodic cues. In support of this view, artificial language learning studies have demonstrated that consonants (C) support statistical computations, whereas vowels (V) allow certain structural generalizations. Nevertheless, these asymmetries could be mere by-products of lower level acoustic differences between Cs and Vs, in particular the energy they carry, and thus their relative salience. Here we address this issue and show that vowels remain the preferred targets for generalizations, even when consonants are made highly salient or vowels barely audible. Participants listened to speech streams of nonsense CVCVCV words, in which consonants followed a simple ABA structure. Participants failed to generalize this structure over sonorant consonants (Experiment 1), even when vowel duration was reduced to one third of that of consonants (Experiment 2). When vowels were eliminated from the stream, participants showed only a marginal evidence of generalizations (Experiment 4). In contrast, participants readily generalized the structure over barely audible vowels (Experiment 3). These results show that different roles of consonants and vowels cannot be readily reduced to acoustical and perceptual differences between these phonetic categories.

[1]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[2]  Willy Serniclaes,et al.  Neural correlates of switching from auditory to speech perception , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  G. N. Clements Does Sonority Have a Phonetic Basis , 2009 .

[4]  H. Gleitman,et al.  Human simulations of vocabulary learning , 1999, Cognition.

[5]  T. Nazzi Use of phonetic specificity during the acquisition of new words: differences between consonants and vowels , 2005, Cognition.

[6]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  R. Tunney,et al.  Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology , 2018 .

[9]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  What Face Inversion Does to Infants' Counting Abilities , 2005, Psychological science.

[10]  B van Ooijen,et al.  Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: evidence from a word reconstruction task. , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[11]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[12]  R. Schvaneveldt,et al.  The basis of transfer in artificial grammar learning , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[13]  B. Ooijen Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: Evidence from a word reconstruction task , 1996 .

[14]  M. Tomasello The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  C. C. Levelt,et al.  Signal to Syntax; Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition , 1999, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[16]  Alfred Mertins,et al.  Automatic speech recognition and speech variability: A review , 2007, Speech Commun..

[17]  P. Ladefoged A course in phonetics , 1975 .

[18]  Marina Nespor,et al.  Signal-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2002, Science.

[19]  Marcela Peña,et al.  ON THE DIFFERENT ROLES OF VOWELS AND CONSONANTS IN SPEECH PROCESSING AND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2003 .

[20]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Connectionist modelling of the separable processing of consonants and vowels , 2003, Brain and Language.

[21]  Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz,et al.  Perceptual constraints and the learnability of simple grammars , 2007, Cognition.

[22]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Rules and Representations , 1982 .

[23]  K. Plunkett,et al.  Phonological specificity of vowels and consonants in early lexical representations , 2007 .

[24]  Marina Nespor,et al.  On Consonants, Vowels, Chickens, and Eggs , 2007, Psychological science.

[25]  P. Ladefoged Vowels and consonants : an introduction to the sounds of languages , 2001 .

[26]  N. Sebastián-Gallés,et al.  Constraints of vowels and consonants on lexical selection: Cross-linguistic comparisons , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[27]  Brit van Ooyen,et al.  Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition: the case of the head-direction parameter , 2003 .

[28]  Boris New,et al.  Beyond stop consonants: Consonantal specificity in early lexical acquisition , 2007 .

[29]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[30]  J. Mehler,et al.  Linguistic Constraints on Statistical Computations , 2005, Psychological science.

[31]  Mikko Sams,et al.  Perceiving identical sounds as speech or non-speech modulates activity in the left posterior superior temporal sulcus , 2006, NeuroImage.

[32]  Eric Wanner,et al.  Language acquisition: the state of the art , 1982 .

[33]  M. Hauser,et al.  Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  A. Endress,et al.  Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream , 2007, Cognition.

[35]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Does Grammar Constrain Statistical Learning? , 2007, Psychological science.

[36]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Separable processing of consonants and vowels , 2000, Nature.

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Psychological and biological models , 1986 .

[38]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Levels of description in consonant/vowel processing: Reply to Knobel and Caramazza , 2007, Brain and Language.

[39]  M. Raijmakers Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. , 1997 .

[40]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[41]  G. N. Clements Does sonority have a phonetic basis? Comments on the chapter by Bert Vaux , 2006 .

[42]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Evaluating computational models in cognitive neuropsychology: The case from the consonant/vowel distinction , 2007, Brain and Language.

[43]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  The role of salience in the extraction of algebraic rules. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  J. Mehler,et al.  Finding Words and Rules in a Speech Stream , 2008, Psychological science.

[45]  Michael J Owren,et al.  The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Marina Nespor,et al.  The “Soul” of Language does not use Statistics: Reflections on Vowels and Consonants , 2006, Cortex.

[47]  John Garcia,et al.  Behavioral Regulation of the Milieu Interne in Man and Rat , 1974, Science.

[48]  Sophie K. Scott,et al.  Lexical retrieval constrained by sound structure: The role of the left inferior frontal gyrus , 2005, Brain and Language.

[49]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .