Increased sow nutrition during midgestation affects muscle fiber development and meat quality, with no consequences on growth performance.

Pregnant sow nutrition has potential effects on the muscle fiber development of progeny in utero. A total of 199 Landrace x Large White sows from parities 0 to 6 and their offspring were used to evaluate the effects of increasing the feeding amount during midpregnancy on the muscle tissue, growth performance, and meat quality of the progeny. The experiment was divided into 2 study replicates, and in each replicate, sows were assigned to 1 of the 2 treatments: 1) sows in the control group (C sows) were fed 2.5 to 3.0 kg/d (feed: 12.1 MJ of ME/kg and 0.62% lysine) throughout gestation; and 2) sows in the high group (H sows) received an extra feed allowance of 1.5 kg/d for gilts and 2.0 kg/d for multiparous sows above the C amount from d 45 to 85 of gestation (period of secondary muscle fiber formation). Sow backfat was recorded on d 40 and 85 of gestation. Sow performance (litter size and piglet BW) at farrowing and on d 18 of lactation was measured. At weaning, pigs were divided into 5 BW groups/treatment, and progeny growth performance was measured during the nursery (n = 958) and the growing-finishing (n = 636) periods. At slaughter, carcass and meat quality traits (lean content, main cut weight, pH, Minolta color, and drip loss) were recorded from the second lightest group at weaning (BW group 4; n = 90), and samples from the longissimus thoracis muscle were taken to study muscle fiber characteristics (n = 70). The extra nutrition from d 45 to 85 of gestation did not lead to differences in litter size or piglet BW at farrowing and on d 18 of lactation. Pigs born to H mothers had fewer muscle fibers and fewer estimated primary and secondary fibers than did pigs born to C mothers (P < 0.05). However, postnatal growth performance was not consistently affected by the maternal treatment. The smaller number of muscle fibers found in the H group of pigs was associated with fewer type IIB fibers (P < 0.05) with greater cross-sectional areas (P < 0.10), which might be related to the significantly greater meat pH at 24 h postmortem and the smaller L* (lightness) values recorded in the H group of pigs. Results from the present study confirm the existence of effects of maternal nutrition on fetal development, at least in terms of muscle tissue development and meat quality, although with no beneficial effects were found for the postnatal growth performance of the progeny.

[1]  C. Rehfeldt,et al.  How many muscle samples are required to obtain reliable estimations of muscle fibre characteristics from pig longissimus muscle? , 2007, Meat science.

[2]  C. Godfraind,et al.  Could the pale, soft, and exudative condition be explained by distinctive histological characteristics? , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[3]  P. B. Lynch,et al.  The influence of over feeding sows during gestation on reproductive performance and pig growth to slaughter , 2007 .

[4]  M. Tokach,et al.  Effects of high feed intake during early gestation on sow performance and offspring growth and carcass characteristics , 2006 .

[5]  C. Putman,et al.  The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[6]  L. Lefaucheur,et al.  Low birth weight is associated with enlarged muscle fiber area and impaired meat tenderness of the longissimus muscle in pigs. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[7]  L. Lefaucheur Myofibre typing and its relationships to growth performance and meat quality , 2006 .

[8]  N. A. Fonseca,et al.  Muscle Fiber Number and Growth Performance of Pigs from Sows Treated with Ractopamine , 2005 .

[9]  Guoyao Wu,et al.  Maternal nutrition and fetal development. , 2004, The Journal of nutrition.

[10]  H. Andersson,et al.  Effect of extra maternal feed supply in early gestation on sow and piglet performance and production and meat quality of growing/finishing pigs , 2004 .

[11]  G. Bee Effect of early gestation feeding, birth weight, and gender of progeny on muscle fiber characteristics of pigs at slaughter. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[12]  N. Stickland,et al.  Number and size of muscle fibres in relation to meat production. , 2004 .

[13]  P. M. Nissen,et al.  Increased maternal nutrition of sows has no beneficial effects on muscle fiber number or postnatal growth and has no impact on the meat quality of the offspring. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[14]  J. Owens,et al.  Variable maternal nutrition and growth hormone treatment in the second quarter of pregnancy in pigs alter semitendinosus muscle in adolescent progeny , 2003, British Journal of Nutrition.

[15]  L. Lefaucheur,et al.  Early postnatal food intake alters myofiber maturation in pig skeletal muscle. , 2003, The Journal of nutrition.

[16]  L. Lefaucheur,et al.  New Insights into Muscle Fiber Types in the Pig , 2002, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[17]  D. Gerrard,et al.  Influence of halothane genotype and body-weight on myosin heavy chain composition in pig muscle as related to meat quality , 2002 .

[18]  N. Stickland,et al.  Maternal treatment with somatotropin during early gestation affects basic events of myogenesis in pigs , 2001, Cell and Tissue Research.

[19]  H. Böhme Nutrition of Sows and Boars , 2001 .

[20]  K. Ender,et al.  Myogenesis and postnatal skeletal muscle cell growth as influenced by selection , 2000 .

[21]  M. Vestergaard,et al.  Long-term changes in performance and meat quality of Danish Landrace pigs: a study on a current compared with an unimproved genotype , 2000 .

[22]  H. Miller,et al.  Increasing food intake in late gestation improved sow condition throughout lactation but did not affect piglet viability or growth rate , 2000 .

[23]  R. Klont,et al.  Skeletal muscle fibres as factors for pork quality , 1999 .

[24]  R. G. Kauffman,et al.  The relationship of sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar protein solubility to colour and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle. , 1999, Meat science.

[25]  L. Lefaucheur,et al.  Phenotypic and genetic parameters for longissimus muscle fiber characteristics in relation to growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in large white pigs. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[26]  N. Oksbjerg,et al.  Histo- and biochemical characteristics of the Longissimus dorsi muscle in pigs and their relationships to performance and meat quality. , 1997, Meat science.

[27]  R. G. Kauffman,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN COLOR AND WATER‐HOLDING CAPACITY IN POSTRIGOR PORCINE LONGISSIMUS MUSCLE , 1995 .

[28]  N. Stickland,et al.  The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[29]  R. Latorre,et al.  Skeletal muscle fibre types in the dog. , 1993, Journal of anatomy.

[30]  V. C. Speer Partitioning nitrogen and amino acids for pregnancy and lactation in swine: a review. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[31]  N. Stickland,et al.  Muscle development in large and small pig fetuses. , 1983, Journal of anatomy.

[32]  Malcolm C. Bourne,et al.  Texture profile analysis , 1978 .

[33]  R. Cassens,et al.  Prenatal development, histochemistry and innervation of porcine muscle. , 1973, Journal of animal science.

[34]  Board on Agriculture,et al.  Nutrient requirements of swine , 1964 .