Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA).

Biological monitoring (BM or biomonitoring) deals with the assessment of individual human exposure, effect and susceptibility to occupational risk factors. It is a fundamental tool in occupational health risk assessment (OHRA) and occupational health practice (OHP) and it has become one of the most, if not the most active area in occupational health (OH) research today. From the few hundred BM papers published in the 80s, there are now several tens of thousand papers published in the peer review literature each year, and the trend is still rising exponentially. As a result, BM has become a priority for the Scientific Committee on Occupational Toxicology (SCOT) of the International Commission on Occupational Health (ICOH). Moreover, there has been a long-term interest in biological monitoring by other SCs of ICOH such as the Scientific Committees on Toxicology of Metals (SCTM) and on Rural Health (SCRH). Despite its current popularity, though, BM is not always correctly used or interpreted by those involved in OHRA or OHP. The present review has been prepared to fill this gap and to help preventing misuse and misinterpretation of data. Although the document is meant to be a reference primarily for those involved in OH research and/or practice, it might become of interest for a wider audience within and outside ICOH, including scientists, occupational physicians, industrial hygienists and occupational or public health professionals in general, involved in chemical risk assessment for occupational health. The mission of SCOT and also of other SCs of ICOH, such as SCTM and SCRH, is indeed to promote the advancement and diffusion of knowledge on biological monitoring and other relevant occupational toxicology aspects and to make them available and useful to the entire OH scientific community. All articles retrieved as of 3 January, 2007 as "Review" with the combined key words "biological monitoring" in PubMed from 2000 to 2007 have been scanned individually. This yielded a total of 1400 articles from a grand total of 2486 (excluding limitation on year of publication). When the title was related to human occupational biological monitoring, the abstract was read and its content was included. Articles outside the 2000-2007 time frame or that are not classified as "Review" in PubMed have also been included, when relevant. The review is in four parts: (a) the introduction, containing the basic principles and definitions of BM and the different types of biomarkers (BMK), their toxicological significance, practical use and limitations, (b) the methodological and analytical aspects of BM in exposed workers, (c) the interpretation and management of BM data, including a number of recommendations to be considered when planning, performing and interpreting BM results and, finally, (d) the ethical aspects of BM. A list of key references to relevant papers or documents has been included. The BM of specific chemicals or groups of chemicals is outside the purpose of the review. The document is aimed to represent the state of the art on biological monitoring in occupational risk assessment. We expect that reference to its content will be made, whenever appropriate, by those involved in occupational health practice and research when dealing with BM issues. The document is not meant, though, to represent a rigid nor a permanent set of rules and it will be periodically updated according to new developments and any significant advance in BM science. Any part of the document, therefore, is open to suggestions by scientifically qualified persons or institutions officially involved in BM and comments should be sent directly to the authors. A preliminary draft of the document has been presented at the 7th International Symposium on Biological Monitoring, Beijing, 10-12 September, 2007.

[1]  P. Schulte,et al.  Some implications of genetic biomarkers in occupational epidemiology and practice. , 2004, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[2]  James Raymer,et al.  Biomonitoring of Exposure in Farmworker Studies , 2006, Environmental health perspectives.

[3]  Paola Manini,et al.  Exposure assessment at the workplace: implications of biological variability. , 2007, Toxicology letters.

[4]  G. Becher,et al.  Biomarkers of exposure to heterocyclic amines: approaches to improve the exposure assessment. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  Brenda Eskenazi,et al.  Biological sample collection and processing for molecular epidemiological studies. , 2003, Mutation research.

[6]  L. Casteleyn,et al.  Current scientific, ethical and social issues of biomonitoring in the European Union. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[7]  S. Bonassi,et al.  Validation of biomarkers as early predictors of disease. , 2001, Mutation research.

[8]  B. Fowler,et al.  Biological Monitoring and Biomarkers , 2007 .

[9]  G. Nordberg,et al.  Biological Monitoring of Toxic Metals , 1988, Rochester Series on Environmental Toxicity.

[10]  Yuehe Lin,et al.  Noninvasive Biomonitoring Approaches to Determine Dosimetry and Risk Following Acute Chemical Exposure: Analysis of Lead or Organophosphate Insecticide in Saliva , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[11]  C. Viau Biomonitoring in occupational health: scientific, socio-ethical, and regulatory issues. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[12]  M. Nordberg,et al.  Glossary of terms relating to pesticides (IUPAC Recommendations 2006) , 2006 .

[13]  C. Ong,et al.  Biomarkers for male reproductive health hazards: are they available? , 2002, Toxicology letters.

[14]  M C Keifer,et al.  Effectiveness of interventions in reducing pesticide overexposure and poisonings. , 2000, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  G. Scherer Biomonitoring of inhaled complex mixtures--ambient air, diesel exhaust and cigarette smoke. , 2005, Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie.

[16]  Division on Earth Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process , 1983 .

[17]  M. Manno,et al.  Chlorzoxazone, a selective probe for phenotyping CYP2E1 in humans. , 1999, Pharmacogenetics.

[18]  J. Pleil,et al.  A review of the USEPA's single breath canister (SBC) method for exhaled volatile organic biomarkers , 2002, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[19]  V. Mersch-Sundermann,et al.  Use of primary blood cells for the assessment of exposure to occupational genotoxicants in human biomonitoring studies. , 2004, Toxicology.

[20]  W. P. Watson,et al.  Monitoring human occupational and environmental exposures to polycyclic aromatic compounds. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[21]  M. Imbriani,et al.  Gases and organic solvents in urine as biomarkers of occupational exposure: a review , 2005, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[22]  Richard A Fenske,et al.  State-of-the-art measurement of agricultural pesticide exposures. , 2005, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[23]  K. Schaller,et al.  An analysis of criteria for biological limit values developed in Germany and in the United States , 1999, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[24]  H. Drexler,et al.  Quality assurance of biological monitoring in occupational and environmental medicine. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[25]  M. Khoury,et al.  Delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase genotype and lead toxicity: a HuGE review. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  P. Boogaard Use of haemoglobin adducts in exposure monitoring and risk assessment. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[27]  Gunnar F. Nordberg,et al.  Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals , 1979 .

[28]  Monica Nordberg,et al.  Glossary of terms used in toxicokinetics (IUPAC Recommendations 2003) , 2004 .

[29]  Elaine Symanski,et al.  Assessment of variability in biomonitoring data using a large database of biological measures of exposure. , 2002, AIHA journal : a journal for the science of occupational and environmental health and safety.

[30]  Case studies in the use of toxicological measures in epidemiological studies. , 2002, Toxicology.

[31]  F. Oesch,et al.  Spectrum of styrene-induced DNA adducts: the relationship to other biomarkers and prospects in human biomonitoring. , 2002, Mutation research.

[32]  John W Cherrie,et al.  How important is inadvertent ingestion of hazardous substances at work? , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[33]  J. Tanus-Santos,et al.  A Critical Review of Biomarkers Used for Monitoring Human Exposure to Lead: Advantages, Limitations, and Future Needs , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[34]  David H Phillips,et al.  DNA adducts as markers of exposure and risk. , 2005, Mutation research.

[35]  N. Holland,et al.  Molecular epidemiology biomarkers--sample collection and processing considerations. , 2005, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[36]  Ricarda Thier,et al.  Biological monitoring and Biological Limit Values (BLV): the strategy of the European Union. , 2006, Toxicology letters.

[37]  J. A. Bond,et al.  The use of biological markers in toxicology. , 1989, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[38]  Dana B Barr,et al.  Analytical methods for biological monitoring of exposure to pesticides: a review. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[39]  R. Albertini Validated biomarker responses influence medical surveillance of individuals exposed to genotoxic agents. , 2001, Radiation Protection Dosimetry.

[40]  W. Niessen,et al.  Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in occupational toxicology: a novel approach to the study of biotransformation of industrial chemicals. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[41]  Dana B Barr,et al.  Uses of speciation techniques in biomonitoring for assessing human exposure to organic environmental chemicals , 2005, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[42]  Ricarda Thier,et al.  The cytochrome P-450 isoenzyme CYP2E1 in the biological processing of industrial chemicals: consequences for occupational and environmental medicine , 2003, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[43]  A. Calafat,et al.  PHTHALATES AND HUMAN HEALTH , 2005, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[44]  J H Ross,et al.  Pesticide exposure monitoring databases in applied risk analysis. , 2006, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[45]  M. Manno,et al.  Occupational Toluene Exposure Induces Cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA Expression in Peripheral Lymphocytes , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[46]  R. Zielhuis,et al.  Definitions of monitoring activities and their relevance for the practice of occupational health , 1986, International archives of occupational and environmental health.

[47]  M. Jakubowski,et al.  Biological Monitoring of Exposure: Trends and Key Developments , 2005, Journal of occupational health.

[48]  G. Latini Monitoring phthalate exposure in humans. , 2005, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[49]  N. Rothman,et al.  Use of 'omic' Technologies to Study Humans Exposed to Benzene , 2005 .

[50]  F. Neuhann,et al.  Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices , 2001 .

[51]  R. Vermeulen,et al.  Carcinogen biomonitoring in human exposures and laboratory research: validation and application to human occupational exposures. , 2002, Toxicology letters.

[52]  T. Vougiouklakis,et al.  Hair as a Biological Indicator of Drug Use, Drug Abuse or Chronic Exposure to Environmental Toxicants , 2006, International journal of toxicology.

[53]  H. K. Wilson,et al.  New technologies in the use of exhaled breath analysis for biological monitoring. , 1999, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[54]  H. Kay Environmental Health Criteria , 1980 .

[55]  W. Brown,et al.  Biomarkers of toluene diisocyanate exposure. , 2002, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[56]  W. Draper Biological monitoring: exquisite research probes, risk assessment, and routine exposure measurement. , 2001, Analytical chemistry.

[57]  S. Semple,et al.  Dermal exposure to chemicals in the workplace: just how important is skin absorption? , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[58]  C. Viau Biological monitoring of exposure to mixtures. , 2002, Toxicology letters.

[59]  W. P. Watson,et al.  Role of biomarkers in monitoring exposures to chemicals: present position, future prospects , 2004, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[60]  Claudia Bolognesi,et al.  Genotoxicity of pesticides: a review of human biomonitoring studies. , 2003, Mutation research.

[61]  F. Gil,et al.  Biomarkers as biological indicators of xenobiotic exposure , 2001, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.