The Moderating Role of Absorptive Capacity in the Assimilation of Enterprise Information Systems

We attempt to understand how external institutional forces affecting ERP assimilation within organizations need not impact all organizations uniformly but instead can be moderated by the enterprises’ knowledge-based capabilities. Building on an institutional model of ERP assimilation, we investigate the role of absorptive capacity (ACAP) in ERP assimilation. Specifically we examine how the ACAP of an organization can enhance or retard the effect of institutional forces on the degree of ERP assimilation. Following a recent framework we operationalize ACAP as potential ACAP (PACAP) and realized ACAP (RACAP) and find that both dimensions affect ERP assimilation in different ways. While both, PACAP and RACAP, have a direct positive impact on assimilation, PACAP moderates the impact of mimetic forces on assimilation whereas RACAP moderates the effect of normative pressures. While we find overall a strong support for our hypothesized model, interestingly, we also find that RACAP negatively moderates the effect of mimetic pressures on assimilation. We discuss the contributions of this study to a better understanding of IT assimilation processes.

[1]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[2]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  Emerging Electronic Partnerships: Antecedents and Dimensions of EDI Use from the Supplier's Perspective , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[4]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Emergent maintenance of ERP: new roles and relationships , 2001, J. Softw. Maintenance Res. Pract..

[5]  Jacky Swan,et al.  A knowledge‐focused perspective on the diffusion and adoption of complex information technologies: the BPR example , 2000, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[7]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  The assimilation of software process innovations: an organizational learning perspective , 1997 .

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Organizational Buyers' Adoption and Use of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: Efficiency- and Legitimacy-Oriented Perspectives , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[10]  H DavenportThomas.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system , 1998 .

[11]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[12]  Sue Newell,et al.  The illusion of ‘best practice’ in information systems for operations management , 1999 .

[13]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[14]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[15]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Enterprise resource planning and organizational knowledge: patterns of convergence and divergence , 2000, ICIS.

[16]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[17]  Toni M. Somers,et al.  A taxonomy of players and activities across the ERP project life cycle , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[20]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Shaping UP for E-Commerce: Institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimliation of Web Technologies , 2002, MIS Q..

[21]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Packaged software development teams: what makes them different? , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  R. Burt.  Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  V. Sambamurthy,et al.  Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Why Western vendors don't dominate China's ERP market , 2004, CACM.

[25]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Effects of Absorptive Capacity on Organizational Predisposition Toward Information Systems , 2003, ICIS.

[26]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[27]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[29]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation , 1997 .

[30]  Sanjay Gosain,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[32]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[33]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Michael W. Macy,et al.  In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  A framework for evaluating ERP implementation choices , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[36]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Measuring the Extent of EDI Usage in Complex Organizations: Strategies and Illustrative Examples , 1996, MIS Q..

[37]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..