THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES

This study examines the effectiveness of using visual feedback from ultrasound in remediation of persistent ITI errors. Ultrasound provides the learner and the clinician with a dynamic sagittal or coronal image of the tongue during speech production. The participants in this study were two adolescent boys ages 12 and 14 who had not yet learned to produce an on-target North American IT I in any context. Both participants had received at least one year of traditional IT I therapy without improvement. Therapy was provided over 13 one-hour sessions using visual feed back from ultrasound. Initially, the ITI was broken down into individual motor targets (tip, body, root); these components were then practiced in combination to produce Irl in isolation, then in syllables, words, and phrases. Post-treatment improvements were analyzed through transcription, acoustic analysis, and tongue shape measurement. Both participants' ITI productions were rated as having more tokens of on-target Irl post-treatment. Acoustic results supported these findings with a lowering of the third formant post-treatment. Tongue shape measures indicated that the participants' tongue shapes were more similar to the modeled tongue shape post-treatment. It was concluded that visual feedback from ultrasound is beneficial in remediation of persistent ITI errors. T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S Abstract ii Table of

[1]  Articulation: A Physiological Approach , 1995 .

[2]  Bryan Gick,et al.  Intergestural Timing in English /r/ , 2003 .

[3]  I. Schwarz,et al.  The Removable R-Appliance as a Practice Device to Facilitate Correct Production of /r/ , 1993 .

[4]  J. Stemberger,et al.  Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[5]  Lawrence D. Shriberg, Peter Flipsen Jr, Heather B. Karlsson,et al.  Acoustic phenotypes for speech-genetics studies: an acoustic marker for residual /з/ distortions , 2001 .

[6]  Susan Nittrouer,et al.  Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Linda I. Shuster,et al.  Evoking [r] Using Visual Feedback , 1992 .

[8]  C. Ferrand,et al.  Speech Science: An Integrated Approach to Theory and Clinical Practice , 2000 .

[9]  D M Ruscello,et al.  Visual feedback in treatment of residual phonological disorders. , 1995, Journal of communication disorders.

[10]  J. Stemberger,et al.  Handbook of Phonological Development: From the Perspective of Constraint-Based Nonlinear Phonology , 1999 .

[11]  Roger W. Steeve,et al.  The physiologic development of speech motor control: lip and jaw coordination. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  P. Delattre,et al.  A DIALECT STUDY OF AMERICAN R’S BY X-RAY MOTION PICTURE , 1968 .

[13]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Acoustic Analysis of Speech , 2009 .

[14]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Toward articulatory-acoustic models for liquid approximants based on MRI and EPG data. Part I. The laterals , 1997 .

[15]  Mary J. Lindstrom,et al.  Differences among speakers in lingual articulation for American English /r/ , 1998, Speech Commun..

[16]  S. Mcleod,et al.  The ICF: a framework for setting goals for children with speech impairment , 2004 .

[17]  D. Weenink Experimental Phonetics , 1901, Nature.

[18]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[19]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Acoustics of children's speech: developmental changes of temporal and spectral parameters. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  L. Shriberg An Intervention Procedure for Children with Persistent /r/ Errors , 1980 .

[21]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[22]  J. M. Palmer Anatomy for Speech and Hearing , 1972 .

[23]  B. Gick,et al.  Speech habilitation of hard of hearing adolescents using electropalatography and ultrasound as evaluated by trained listeners , 2003, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[24]  D. Ruscello,et al.  Planning and self-assessment in articulatory training. , 1979, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[25]  M. Stone,et al.  Three-dimensional tongue surface shapes of English consonants and vowels. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  L. Shuster,et al.  The Use of Visual Feedback to Elicit Correct /r/ , 1995 .

[27]  C Y Espy-Wilson,et al.  Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  F. Gibbon Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/phonological disorders. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[29]  D. Ruscello Speech appliances in the treatment of phonological disorders. , 1995, Journal of communication disorders.

[30]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Maximum performance tests of speech production. , 1987, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[31]  T. M. Graber,et al.  Anatomical and Physiological Bases of Speech , 1982 .

[32]  J. Bernthal,et al.  Articulation and Phonological Disorders , 1988 .

[33]  Shrikanth S. Narayanan,et al.  Acoustic modeling of American English , 2000 .

[34]  L. Shriberg A Response Evocation Program for /ɝ/ , 1975 .