Learning Recursion: Multiple Nested and Crossed Dependencies
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] George A. Miller,et al. Free Recall of Self-Embedded English Sentences , 1964, Inf. Control..
[2] Jacques Mehler,et al. Do Humans Really Learn AnBn Artificial Grammars From Exemplars? , 2008, Cogn. Sci..
[3] Donald J. Foss,et al. Some effects of memory limitation upon sentence comprehension and recall , 1970 .
[4] Paul Hagstrom,et al. Differences Between Korean and Japanese Processing Overload , 1997 .
[5] Noam Chomsky,et al. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.
[6] Guillén Fernández,et al. Neural correlates of artificial syntactic structure classification , 2006, NeuroImage.
[7] Peter Hagoort,et al. Implicit Learning and Dyslexia , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[8] R N Aslin,et al. Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.
[9] Pienie Zwitserlood,et al. Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: The learnability of embedded hierarchical structures , 2008, Cognition.
[10] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Sequential Expectations: The Role of Prediction-Based Learning in Language , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[11] J. S. Evans,et al. Understanding sentences with relative clauses , 1976, Memory & cognition.
[12] M. Braine,et al. Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences , 1974 .
[13] Fred Karlsson,et al. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses , 2007 .
[14] Timothy Q. Gentner,et al. Recursive syntactic pattern learning by songbirds , 2006, Nature.
[15] John Payne. Pullum, Geoffrey K. , 2012 .
[16] D. Everett. Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã , 2005, Current Anthropology.
[17] Michael C. Corballis,et al. Recursion, Language, and Starlings , 2007, Cogn. Sci..
[18] Elissa L. Newport,et al. Statistical Learning of Syntax: The Role of Transitional Probability , 2007 .
[19] I. M. Schlesinger,et al. WHY A SENTENCE IN WHICH A SENTENCE IN WHICH A SENTENCE IS EMBEDDED IS EMBEDDED IS DIFFICULT , 1975 .
[20] D. J. Foss,et al. Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure reconsidered , 1970 .
[21] J. Saffran. The Use of Predictive Dependencies in Language Learning , 2001 .
[22] J. Deese,et al. Comprehensibility and Subject-Verb Relations in Complex Sentences. , 1971 .
[23] R. Gómez. Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.
[24] Alaa A. Kharbouch,et al. Three models for the description of language , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.
[25] Karl Magnus Petersson,et al. On the relevance of the neurobiological analogue of the finite-state architecture , 2005, Neurocomputing.
[26] A. Rey,et al. Does the mastery of center-embedded linguistic structures distinguish humans from nonhuman primates? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[27] P. Greenfield,et al. Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[28] A. Reber. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge , 1993 .
[29] Richard N Aslin,et al. Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[30] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[31] Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.
[32] Hava T. Siegelmann,et al. Neural networks and analog computation - beyond the Turing limit , 1999, Progress in theoretical computer science.
[33] P. Perruchet,et al. Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[34] Sarah C. Creel,et al. Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[35] Axel Cleeremans,et al. Implicit learning: news from the front , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[36] Alfred Anwander,et al. Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[37] E. Newport,et al. Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.
[38] Jutta L. Mueller,et al. Learnability of Embedded Syntactic Structures Depends on Prosodic Cues , 2010, Cogn. Sci..
[39] David J. Lobina. Recursion and the competence/performance distinction in AGL tasks , 2011 .
[40] Stefan Knecht,et al. Electrical Stimulation of Broca's Area Enhances Implicit Learning of an Artificial Grammar , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[41] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics , 1974 .
[42] L R Squire,et al. Intact learning of artificial grammars and intact category learning by patients with Parkinson's disease. , 1999, Behavioral neuroscience.
[43] A. Friederici. Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[44] E. Gibson,et al. Memory Limitations and Structural Forgetting: The Perception of Complex Ungrammatical Sentences as Grammatical , 1999 .
[45] Arthur S. Reber,et al. Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation , 1978, Cognition.
[46] Edward E. Smith,et al. A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.
[47] Manuel Gimenes,et al. The effect of noun phrase type on working memory saturation during sentence comprehension , 2009 .
[48] Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al. How recursive is language? A Bayesian exploration , 2010 .
[49] M. Hauser,et al. Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.
[50] L. Squire,et al. Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[51] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. When Less is Less and When Less is More: Starting Small with Staged Input , 2003 .
[52] J. Elman. Learning and development in neural networks: the importance of starting small , 1993, Cognition.
[53] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. A Usage-Based Approach to Recursion in Sentence Processing , 2009 .
[54] E. Newport,et al. Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .
[55] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism , 2010, Cognition.
[56] M. Hauser,et al. Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins , 2001, Cognition.
[57] Nick Chater,et al. Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing , 2005 .
[58] Marilyn D. Wang. The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility , 1970 .
[59] D Burns,et al. Sentence comprehension and memory for embedded structure , 1977, Memory & cognition.
[60] Joan Y. Chiao,et al. An Event-related fMRI Study of Artificial Grammar Learning in a Balanced Chunk Strength Design , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[61] P. Hagoort,et al. What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax , 2012, Brain and Language.
[62] Dianne Bradley,et al. The Effect of -ga Sequences on Processing Japanese Multiply Center-Embedded Sentences , 1996, PACLIC.
[63] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. On-Line Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Language Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.
[64] Willem J.M. Levelt. Formal Grammars in Linguistics and Psycholinguistics: Volume 1: An Introduction to the Theory of Formal Languages and Automata, Volume 2: Applications in Linguistic Theory, Volume 3: Psycholinguistic Applications , 2008 .
[65] Norbert Hornstein,et al. 'The future of language' (Science) [7] , 2005 .
[66] Z. Pylyshyn. The role of competence theories in cognitive psychology , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[67] Morten H. Christiansen,et al. Sequential learning in non-human primates , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[68] M. Ullman. Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model , 2004, Cognition.
[69] Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al. The faculty of language , 2007 .
[70] William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al. Crossed and nested dependencies in German and Dutch , 1986 .
[71] P. Greenfield,et al. Strategies used to combine seriated cups by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and capuchins (Cebus apella). , 1999, Journal of comparative psychology.
[72] Lawrence E. Marks,et al. Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences , 1968 .
[73] Jean-Michel Peterfalvi,et al. L'acceptabilité des phrases , 1971 .
[74] Peter Hagoort,et al. A matter of time: Implicit acquisition of recursive sequence structures , 2009 .
[75] E. Saltzman,et al. The development of rulebound strategies for manipulating seriated cups: A parallel between action and grammar , 1972 .
[76] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure , 1991, Mach. Learn..
[77] D. Hakes,et al. Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns , 1970 .
[78] Joanne M. Williams,et al. Artificial grammar learning in primary school children with and without developmental dyslexia , 2009, Annals of dyslexia.
[79] Christopher M. Conway,et al. Neurocognitive Basis of Implicit Learning of Sequential Structure and Its Relation to Language Processing , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[80] A. Anwander,et al. The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[81] A. Reber. Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .
[82] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca's area , 2008, NeuroImage.
[83] W. Levelt. Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics : Vol.III, Psycholinguistic applications , 1974 .
[84] R. Gómez,et al. Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[85] K. Petersson,et al. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: A preference for grammaticality , 2008, Brain Research.
[86] P. Hagoort,et al. The inferior frontal cortex in artificial syntax processing: An rTMS study , 2008, Brain Research.
[87] G. Miller. Some psychological studies of grammar. , 1962 .
[88] Karl Magnus Petersson,et al. On cognition, structured sequence processing, and adaptive dynamical systems , 2008 .
[89] B. Knowlton,et al. Learning and memory functions of the Basal Ganglia. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.
[90] Morten H. Christiansen. The (Non)Necessity of Recursion in Natural Language Processing , 2002 .
[91] Edith Kaan,et al. What kinds of syntactic phenomena must biologists, neurobiologists, and computer scientists try to explain and replicate? , 2009 .
[92] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Short-term forgetting in sentence comprehension: Crosslinguistic evidence from verb-final structures , 2010 .
[93] W. Fitch,et al. Computational Constraints on Syntactic Processing in a Nonhuman Primate , 2004, Science.
[94] Michael C. Corballis. On Phrase Structure and Brain Responses: A Comment on Bahlmann, Gunter, and Friederici (2006) , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[95] Willem H. Zuidema,et al. Simple rules can explain discrimination of putative recursive syntactic structures by a songbird species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[96] Karl Magnus Petersson,et al. Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[97] Nick Chater,et al. Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[98] Michael L. Hoover,et al. Sentence processing strategies in Spanish and English , 1992 .
[99] S. Kaufman,et al. Intact implicit learning in autism spectrum conditions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[100] Howard Lasnik,et al. Syntactic Structures Revisited: Contemporary Lectures on Classic Transformational Theory , 2000 .
[101] Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al. Recursion and the infinitude claim , 2010 .
[102] Thomas F Münte,et al. Implicit Learning is Intact in Adult Developmental Dyslexic Readers: Evidence from the Serial Reaction Time Task and Artificial Grammar Learning , 2006, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.