On-line monitoring of radiotherapy beams: experimental results with proton beams.

Proton radiotherapy is a powerful tool in the local control of cancer. The advantages of proton radiotherapy over gamma-ray therapy arise from the phenomenon known as the Bragg peak. This phenomenon enables large doses to be delivered to well-defined volumes while sparing surrounding healthy tissue. To fully realize the potential of this technique the location of the high-dose volume must be controlled very accurately. An imaging system was designed and tested to monitor the positron-emitting activity created by the beam as a means of verifying the beam's range, monitoring dose, and determining tissue composition. The prototype imaging system consists of 12 pairs of cylindrical BGO detectors shielded in lead. Each crystal was 1.9 cm in diameter, 5.0 cm long, and separated by 0.5 cm from other detectors in the row. These are arranged in two rows, 60 cm apart, with the proton beam and tissue phantoms half-way between and parallel to the detector rows. Experiments were conducted with 150 MeV continuous and macro-pulsed proton beams which had beam currents ranging from 0.14 nA to 1.75 nA. The production and decay of short-lived isotopes, 15O and 14O, was studied using 1 min irradiations with a continuous beam. These isotopes provide a significant signal on short time scales, making on-line imaging possible. Macro-pulsed beams, having a period of 10 s, were used to study on-line imaging and the production and decay of long-lived isotopes, 13N, 11C, and 18F. Decay data were acquired and on-line images were obtained between beam pulses and indicate that range verification is possible, for a 150 MeV beam, after one beam pulse, to within the 1.2 cm resolution limit of the imaging system. The dose delivered to the patient may also be monitored by observing the increase in the number of coincidence events detected between successive beam pulses. Over 80% of the initial positron-emitting activity is from 15O while the remainder is primarily 11C, 13N, 14O with traces of 18F, and 10C. Radioisotopic imaging may also be performed along the beam path by fitting decay data collected after the treatment is complete. Using this technique, it is shown that variations in elemental composition in inhomogenous treatment volumes may be identified and used to locate anatomic landmarks. Radioisotopic imaging also reveals that 14O is created well beyond the Bragg peak, apparently by secondary neutrons.

[1]  Mark B. Chadwick,et al.  Comprehensive nuclear model calculations: Introduction to the theory and use of the GNASH code , 1992 .

[2]  H D Maccabee,et al.  Tissue activation studies with alpha-particle beams. , 1969, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  K L Lam,et al.  Automated localization of the prostate at the time of treatment using implanted radiopaque markers: technical feasibility. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  W Enghardt,et al.  The investigation of different cameras for in-beam PET imaging. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  B. Emami,et al.  Tissue perfusion rate determined from the decay of oxygen-15 activity after photon activation in situ. , 1979, Science.

[6]  H. Kubo,et al.  Patient positioning for protontherapy using a proton range telescope , 1995 .

[7]  M. Rosetti,et al.  Effects of nuclear interactions on energy and stopping power in proton beam dosimetry , 1996 .

[8]  J. Archambeau,et al.  Beam localization via 15O activation in proton-radiation therapy , 1975 .

[9]  D F Jackson,et al.  The relation between X-ray CT numbers and charged particle stopping powers and its significance for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1983, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  R. T. Ten Haken,et al.  Photon activation-15O decay studies of tumor blood flow. , 1981, Medical physics.

[11]  S Derreumaux,et al.  Is it possible to verify directly a proton-treatment plan using positron emission tomography? , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  M. Goitein Compensation for inhomogeneities in charged particle radiotherapy using computed tomography. , 1978, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. Archambeau,et al.  Visualization and Transport of Positron Emission from Proton Activation in vivo , 1978, Science.

[14]  R. T. Ten Haken,et al.  Activation of the major constituents of tissue and air by a fast neutron radiation therapy beam. , 1983, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[15]  J. Llacer,et al.  A comparison of water equivalent thickness measurements: CT method vs. heavy ion beam technique. , 1985, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  R. Loevinger,et al.  A formalism for calculation of absorbed dose from radionuclides. , 1968, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  G. Albouy,et al.  Fonctions d'excitation des réactions (p, pn) et (p, 2p2n) dans les noyaux légers entre 15 et 155 MeV , 1964 .

[18]  P. Petti,et al.  Differential-pencil-beam dose calculations for charged particles. , 1992, Medical physics.

[19]  Wolfgang Enghardt,et al.  The spatial distribution of positron-emitting nuclei generated by relativistic light ion beams in organic matter , 1992 .

[20]  C. Tobias,et al.  Analysis of Microcomposition of Biological Tissue by Means of Induced Radioactivity. , 1949, Science.

[21]  D. Roberts,et al.  On-line PET monitoring of radiotherapy beams: image reconstruction and Monte Carlo simulations of detector geometries , 1997 .

[22]  Kitwanga,et al.  Production of 14,15O, 18F, and 19Ne radioactive nuclei from (p,n) reactions up to 30 MeV. , 1990, Physical review. C, Nuclear physics.

[23]  P. R. Bevington,et al.  Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences , 1969 .

[24]  P. Leleux,et al.  Production of O-14, O-15, F-18, and Ne-19 radioactive nuclei from (p, n) reactions up to 30 MeV , 1990 .

[25]  E. L. Alpen,et al.  Imaging by Injection of Accelerated Radioactive Particle Beams , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  British Columbia. Proton dose monitoring with PET: quantitative studies in Lucite , 1996 .

[27]  D. Measday The 12C(p, pn)11C reaction from 50 to 160 MeV , 1966 .

[28]  J. Llacer,et al.  Characterization of fragmented heavy-ion beams using a three-stage telescope detector: measurements of 670-MeV/amu 20Ne beams. , 1990, Medical physics.

[30]  M Goitein,et al.  The measurement of tissue heterodensity to guide charged particle radiotherapy. , 1977, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  K. J. Foley,et al.  Gamma Radiation from the Medium Energy Proton Bombardment of Lithium, Beryllium, Boron, Carbon and Nitrogen , 1961 .

[32]  M. Goitein,et al.  The influence of thick inhomogeneities on charged particle beams. , 1978, Radiation research.

[33]  A. Meigooni,et al.  Calculation and Evaluation of Cross Sections and Kerma Factors for Neutrons up to 100 MeV on Carbon , 1996 .

[34]  Proton therapy in combination with PET as monitor: a feasibility study , 1992 .

[35]  W. V. Mayneord,et al.  Production of Radioactivity in Animal Tissues by High-Energy X-Rays , 1949, Nature.

[36]  M. Gusakow,et al.  Spallation de l'oxygene par des protons de 20 A 150 MeV , 1962 .