Construction Grammar as a tool for diachronic analysis

Through a discourse-grounded internal reconstruction that aims at capturing the emergence of grammatical structure, the study examines the development of the subjective epistemic particle jestli ‘[in-my-opinion-] maybe’ in conversational Czech. Through internal reconstruction, the change (syntactic complementizer > speaker-centered epistemic contextualizer > subjective epistemic particle) is presented as a metonymy-based conventionalization of a pragmatic meaning implied by certain tokens of indirect Y/N questions into a new modal meaning. Taking a Construction Grammar approach, so far largely untested on diachronic data, the point of the analysis is to show that we can engage in a systematic treatment of the gradualness of change, by (i) combining the ‘holistic’ (constructional) dimension with the internal, feature-based and discourse-motivated mechanisms of complex grammatical shifts, and (ii) appealing to the explanatory potential of general cognitive and communicative principles as they manifest themselves in natural discourse. I also propose a formalism for representing the transitional nature of intermediate patterns.

[1]  František Daneš,et al.  Intonace a věta ve spisovné češtině , 1957 .

[2]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  Is basic word order universal , 1987 .

[3]  Jan-Ola Östman,et al.  Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch , 2004 .

[4]  Alexander Bergs,et al.  Constructions and constructs:mapping a shift between predication and attribution , 2008 .

[5]  Raimo Anttila,et al.  An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics , 1974 .

[6]  Jan-Ola Östman,et al.  You Know: A Discourse-Functional Approach , 1984 .

[7]  H. Andersen Actualization : linguistic change in progress , 2001 .

[8]  Alan Timberlake 3. Reanalysis and Actualization in Syntactic Change , 1977, Mechanisms of Syntactic Change.

[9]  Jan Lindström,et al.  6. Constructing reasoning: The connectives för att (causal), så att (consecutive) and men att (adversative) in Swedish conversations , 2008 .

[10]  Mirjam Fried,et al.  Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles , 2005 .

[11]  Elisabeth Rieken Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective , 2009 .

[12]  Alice C. Harris Cross‐Linguistic Perspectives on Syntactic Change , 2003 .

[13]  Paul J. Hopper,et al.  On some principles of grammaticization , 1991 .

[14]  E. Traugott Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalization , 1988 .

[15]  S. Thompson “Object complements” and conversation towards a realistic account , 2002 .

[16]  E. Traugott Constructions in Grammaticalization , 2008 .

[17]  Y. Matsumoto 5. Variations in Japanese honorification - deviations or a change in the making? , 2008 .

[18]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  Grammatical Construction Theory and the Familiar Dichotomies , 1989 .

[19]  H. Andersen From Auxiliary to Desinence , 1987 .