Graft Success and Hearing Results between Cartilage Island Graft and Temporal Muscle Fascia Graft Myringoplasty.

OBJECTIVE To compare the graft success and hearing results in patients who underwent cartilage island graft (CIG) myringoplasty and temporal muscle fascia graft (TFG) myringoplasty. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective clinical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Otolaryngology Clinic, Ankara, from January 2013 to January 2018. METHODOLOGY Patients who underwent cartilage island graft myringoplasty and temporal muscle graft myringoplasty for chronic non-suppurative otitis media were inducted. Age, gender, preoperative audiologic examination results, postoperative audiologic examination, perforation site, graft material, preoperative microscopic examination and graft success were documented. RESULTS A total of 116 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 35 ±15.3 years. Fifty-four patients were females and 62 were males. Temporal muscle fascia graft was applied to 68 (58.6%) patients, while cartilage graft was applied to 48 (41.4%) patients. The success rate of graft was found to be 80.2% (55 cases with graft success) in TFG; whereas, this rate was found to be 93.8% (45 cases with graft success) in CIG group. Cartilage island graft material had a better graft success in terms of graft endurance (p = 0.048). There was no statistically significant difference between the two graft materials in terms of postoperative hearing success (p = 0.29). CONCLUSION Cartilage island grafts can be preferable for myringoplasty operations.

[1]  Xiaofei Li,et al.  Comparison of type I tympanoplasty with acellular dermal allograft and cartilage perichondrium , 2019, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  M. Jalali,et al.  Comparison of cartilage with temporalis fascia tympanoplasty: A meta‐analysis of comparative studies , 2017, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  Munish Kambatatti Shekharappa,et al.  Cartilage Myringoplasty: An Ideal Grafting Technique for Complex Perforations. , 2017, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[4]  D. Yadav,et al.  Comparison of results of graft uptake using tragal cartilage perichondrium composite graft versus temporalis fascia in patients undergoing surgery for chronic otitis media – squamous type , 2016, Head & Face Medicine.

[5]  S. Parab,et al.  Comparative study of sliced tragal cartilage and temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty , 2015, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[6]  A. Vashishth,et al.  Clinical advantages of cartilage palisades over temporalis fascia in type I tympanoplasty. , 2014, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[7]  P. Parida,et al.  A Comparative Study of Temporalis Fascia Graft and Vein Graft in Myringoplasty , 2013, Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery.

[8]  M. Yung,et al.  Randomized Study Comparing Fascia and Cartilage Grafts in Myringoplasty , 2011, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  M. Songu,et al.  Comparison of different tympanic membrane reconstruction techniques in type I tympanoplasty , 2011, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[10]  S. Yetişer,et al.  Temporalis Fascia and Cartilage-Perichondrium Composite Shield Grafts for Reconstruction of the Tympanic Membrane , 2009, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[11]  A. Watkins,et al.  Myringoplasty: surgical outcomes and hearing improvement: is it worth performing to improve hearing? , 2008, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[12]  M. Uğuz,et al.  A multivariate analysis of otological, surgical and patient‐related factors in determining success in myringoplasty , 2005, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[13]  J. Dornhoffer Cartilage tympanoplasty: Indications, techniques, and outcomes in A 1,000‐patient series , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  D. Mürbe,et al.  Acoustic Properties of Different Cartilage Reconstruction Techniques of the Tympanic Membrane , 2002, The Laryngoscope.

[15]  J. Snow,et al.  Ballenger's Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery , 2002 .

[16]  Yoshifumi Takahashi,et al.  Tympanoplasty with and without mastoidectomy for non-cholesteatomatous chronic otitis media , 2001, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[17]  N. Bhat,et al.  Retrospective analysis of surgical outcome, symptom changes, and hearing improvement following myringoplasty. , 2000, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[18]  J. Dornhoffer Surgical management of the atelectatic ear. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[19]  A. Russo,et al.  Myringoplasty in Children: Factors Influencing Surgical Outcome , 1998 .

[20]  H. Schöttke,et al.  Einfluss unterschiedlicher Transplantatmaterialien bei der Tympanoplastik Typ 1 auf den Schalldruckpegel im Gehörgang , 1992 .