Observed and Simulated Movement of Bank‐Storage Water

Detailed hydrologic and water-chemistry data were collected that document the movement of bank-storage water during March 7-April 17, 1990, in an alluvial aquifer adjacent to the Cedar River, Iowa. Hydrologic data included 745 daily ground-water-level measurements from 27 observation wells. Water-chemistry data indicate that bank-storage water had smaller specific conductance and larger concentration of atrazine than ambient ground water. To quantify the movement of the bank-storage water, a two-dimensional ground-water flow model was constructed, and the resulting calibrated model accurately simulated observed conditions. Analysis of water chemistry and model results indicate that a 2-meter rise in the river stage caused bank-storage water to move horizontally at least 30 meters into the aquifer and vertically about 4 meters below the river bottom, whereas the remaining 30 percent moved laterally through the riverbank. The model also showed that bank storage caused the ground-water flux to the river to increase by a factor of five during the first three weeks of base flow after runoff and that it required about five weeks for bank-storage water to discharge from the alluvial aquifer after the peak river stage. These results quantitatively demonstrate the importance of bank storage as a source of recharge to the alluvial aquifer and as a source of water to the river during early base-flow conditions.

[1]  R. Hansen Geology and ground-water resources of Linn County, Iowa , 1970 .

[2]  J. Sharp Limitations of bank-storage model assumptions , 1977 .

[3]  E. Thurman,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay compared with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the determination of triazine herbicides in water. , 1990, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  E. Thurman,et al.  Herbicides in surface waters of the midwestern United States: the effect of spring flush , 1991 .

[5]  Paul J. Squillace,et al.  Groundwater as a nonpoint source of atrazine and deethylatrazine in a river during base flow conditions , 1993 .

[6]  M. A. Gill Bank storage characteristics of a finite aquifer due to sudden rise and fall of river level , 1985 .

[7]  T. C. Winter,et al.  The design and use of a hydraulic potentiomanometer for direct measurement of differences in hydraulic head between groundwater and surface water , 1988 .

[8]  Vernon B. Sauer,et al.  Modification of routed streamflow by channel loss and base flow , 1974 .

[9]  H. E. Braun,et al.  Agriculture and Water Quality in the Canadian Great Lakes Basin: V. Pesticide Use in 11 Agricultural Watersheds and Presence in Stream Water, 1975–1977 1 , 1982 .

[10]  G. M. Kondolf,et al.  Effects of bank storage and well pumping on base flow, Carmel River, Monterey County, California , 1987 .

[11]  John L. Wilson,et al.  Flow of Ground Water to a Well Near a Stream – Effect of Ambient Ground‐Water Flow Direction , 1988 .

[12]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Flood Wave Modification Due to Bank Storage Effects , 1971 .

[13]  Hubert J. Morel-Seytoux,et al.  A combined model of water table and river stage evolution , 1975 .

[14]  Bruce Hunt,et al.  An Approximation for the Bank Storage Effect , 1990 .

[15]  M. I. Rorabaugh,et al.  Ground-water movements and bank storage due to flood stages in surface streams , 1963 .

[16]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOILS TO PREFERENTIAL FLOW OF WATER : A FIELD STUDY , 1994 .

[17]  E. Thurman,et al.  A reconnaissance study of herbicides and their metabolites in surface water of the midwestern united states using immunoassay and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry , 1992 .

[18]  S. Schumm The shape of alluvial channels in relation to sediment type , 1960 .

[19]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Determination of Aquifer Diffusivity from Aquifer Response to Fluctuations in River Stage , 1969 .

[20]  H. Bouwer The Bouwer and Rice Slug Test — An Updatea , 1989 .