Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on the Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain Patients: Insights From the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) Trial

Background The impact of diabetes mellitus on the clinical presentation and noninvasive test (NIT) results among stable outpatients presenting with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been well described. Methods and Results The PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial enrolled 10 003 patients with known diabetic status, of whom 8966 were tested as randomized and had interpretable NIT results (1908 with diabetes mellitus, 21%). Differences in symptoms and NIT results were evaluated using logistic regression. Patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) were similar in age (median 61 versus 60 years) and sex (female 54% versus 52%), had a greater burden of cardiovascular comorbidities, and had a similar likelihood of nonchest pain symptoms (29% versus 27%). The Diamond‐Forrester/Coronary Artery Surgery Study score predicted that patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) had similar likelihood of obstructive CAD (low 1.8% versus 2.7%; intermediate 92.3% versus 92.6%; high 5.9% versus 4.7%). Physicians estimated patients with diabetes mellitus to have a higher likelihood of obstructive CAD (low to very low: 28.3% versus 40.1%; intermediate 63.9% versus 55.9%; high to very high 7.8% versus 4.0%). Patients with diabetes mellitus (versus without) were more likely to have a positive NIT result (15% versus 11%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; P=0.01). Conclusions Stable chest pain patients with and without diabetes mellitus have similar presentation and pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD; however, physicians perceive that patients with diabetes mellitus have a higher pretest likelihood of obstructive CAD, an assessment supported by increased risk of a positive NIT. Further evaluation of diabetes mellitus's influence on CAD assessment is required. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01174550.

[1]  Neha J. Pagidipati,et al.  Sex Differences in Functional and CT Angiography Testing in Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Neha J. Pagidipati,et al.  Sex Differences in Demographics, Risk Factors, Presentation, and Noninvasive Testing in Stable Outpatients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the PROMISE Trial. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[3]  Xianzheng Wu,et al.  Association of depression with pre-diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, and previously diagnosed diabetes: a meta-analysis , 2016, Endocrine.

[4]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2016, Circulation.

[5]  H. Hemingway,et al.  Atypical chest pain in diabetic patients with suspected stable angina: impact on diagnosis and coronary outcomes. , 2015, European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes.

[6]  E. Picano,et al.  Prediction of Mortality by Stress Echocardiography in 2835 Diabetic and 11 305 Nondiabetic Patients , 2015, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  J. Suwaidi,et al.  Atypical presentation of acute and chronic coronary artery disease in diabetics. , 2014, World journal of cardiology.

[8]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2014, Circulation.

[9]  D. Goff,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the assessment of cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  K. Anstrom,et al.  PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of chest pain: rationale and design of the PROMISE trial. , 2014, American heart journal.

[11]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Ass , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  C. Brulin,et al.  Patients with diabetes are not more likely to have atypical symptoms when seeking care of a first myocardial infarction. An analysis of 4028 patients in the Northern Sweden MONICA Study , 2012, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[13]  G. Balady,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic testing to evaluate coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes mellitus , 2010, Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders.

[14]  A. Vaag,et al.  Diabetes Patients Requiring Glucose-Lowering Therapy and Nondiabetics With a Prior Myocardial Infarction Carry the Same Cardiovascular Risk: A Population Study of 3.3 Million People , 2008, Circulation.

[15]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[16]  E. Picano,et al.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography and the effect of revascularization on outcome in diabetic and non‐diabetic patients with chronic ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction , 2007, European journal of heart failure.

[17]  E. Picano,et al.  Prognostic value of pharmacological stress echocardiography in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  G. Balady,et al.  Stress Testing in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value , 2006, Circulation.

[19]  L. Svensson,et al.  Symptoms and type of symptom onset in acute coronary syndrome in relation to ST elevation, sex, age, and a history of diabetes. , 2005, American heart journal.

[20]  D. Eterović,et al.  Symptom presentation of acute myocardial infarction: influence of sex, age, and risk factors. , 2002, American heart journal.

[21]  V. Froelicher,et al.  Clinical utility of the exercise ECG in patients with diabetes and chest pain. , 2001, Chest.

[22]  S. Osganian,et al.  Age and sex differences in presentation of symptoms among patients with acute coronary disease: the REACT Trial. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment. , 2000, Coronary artery disease.

[23]  J P Ornato,et al.  Prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality among patients with myocardial infarction presenting without chest pain. , 2000, JAMA.

[24]  D. Berman,et al.  Comparative ability of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. , 1999, American heart journal.

[25]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Safety and feasibility of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients unable to perform an exercise stress test. , 1998, Diabetes care.

[26]  M. Laakso,et al.  Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  J. Ruiz,et al.  Detection of coronary artery disease in diabetic patients , 1995, Diabetologia.

[28]  David A. Gerber,et al.  Predictive value of clinical and exercise variables for detection of coronary artery disease in men with diabetes mellitus. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[29]  S. Malhotra,et al.  A selection of recent, original research papers , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.