Analysis of heart rate and its variation affecting image quality and optimized reconstruction window in retrospective ECG-gated coronary angiography using multi-detector row CT

It is clinically important to study the effect of heart rate and its variation on image quality, and selection of optimized window in coronary angiography using multi-detector row CT (MDCT). We performed contrast-enhanced coronary angiography using MDCT in 83 patients. Sixty cases with available information of heart rate were enrolled in this study. We systemically analyzed the effect of heart rate and its variation. Two radiologists rated image quality as follows: 4, excellent; 3, good; 2, fair; 1, bad. Cardiac cycle windows at 70 and 40% were routinely selected for image reconstruction. Both of 40% and 70% reconstructed images were available only to fifty-seven cases. Optimized window was rated as 1 when 40% reconstruction was better quality than 70%, as 2 when 40% reconstruction was the same as 70%, and as 3 when 70% reconstruction was better than 40%.

[1]  C. Claussen,et al.  Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients. , 2002, Clinical imaging.

[2]  C Georg,et al.  Coronary arteries: retrospectively ECG-gated multi-detector row CT angiography with selective optimization of the image reconstruction window. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  M F Reiser,et al.  ECG-gated reconstructed multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: effect of varying trigger delay on image quality. , 2001, Radiology.

[4]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Visualization of coronary artery anomalies and their anatomic course by contrast-enhanced electron beam tomography and three-dimensional reconstruction. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  M. Reiser,et al.  Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  W Moshage,et al.  In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: measurement with electron-beam CT. , 2000, Radiology.

[7]  W A Kalender,et al.  ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart. , 2000, Medical physics.

[8]  C. Becker,et al.  [Cardiac imaging with rapid, retrospective ECG synchronized multilevel spiral CT]. , 2000, Der Radiologe.

[9]  S Schaller,et al.  Subsecond multi-slice computed tomography: basics and applications. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[10]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  P. V. van Ooijen,et al.  Intravenous coronary angiography by electron beam computed tomography: a clinical evaluation. , 1998, Circulation.

[12]  C. Higgins,et al.  Coronary artery stenoses: assessment with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT and axial reconstructions. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  M. Bell,et al.  Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Comparison of vessel diameters in electron beam tomography and quantitative coronary angiography , 1998, The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging.

[15]  C. J. Ritchie,et al.  Evaluation of electron beam CT coronary angiography in healthy subjects. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  B. Brundage,et al.  Variation of heart rate and electrocardiograph trigger interval during ultrafast computed tomography. , 1996, American journal of cardiac imaging.

[17]  K Bachmann,et al.  Coronary artery stenoses: three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent-enhanced, electron-beam CT. , 1995, Radiology.

[18]  H Anno,et al.  Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT. , 1992, Radiology.

[19]  C. Leier,et al.  Changes in Diastolic Time with Various Pharmacologic Agents: Implication for Myocardial Perfusion , 1979, Circulation.

[20]  R. Alfidi,et al.  The effects of biological motion on CT resolution. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  M. Imazu,et al.  Evaluation of coronary artery stenoses using electron-beam CT and multiplanar reformation. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  S A MacKay,et al.  Methods for evaluating cardiac wall motion in three dimensions using bifurcation points of the coronary arterial tree. , 1983, Investigative radiology.

[23]  S. Paulin.  Coronary angiography : a technical, anatomic and clinical study , 1964 .