A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects

Although interactivity is often considered to have a positive influence on persuasion, research on interactivity effects is actually very mixed. This paper argues that under certain circumstances, interactivity may either enhance or inhibit persuasion. A dual-process model of interactivity effects is proposed and tested that posits differential effects of interactivity on persuasion depending on person and situation factors. Results of an experiment that manipulated level of Web site interactivity and task involvement, and measured user ability (Internet usage experience), show that under low-involvement conditions, the mere presence of interactivity served as a peripheral cue that led to more positive attitudes regardless of ability (experience). Under high-involvement conditions, however, interactivity elicited more positive attitudes for experienced users but less positive attitudes for inexperienced users. Implications for the use of interactivity in advertising and promotions are discussed.

[1]  C. Staats,et al.  Attitudes established by classical conditioning. , 1958, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[2]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[3]  G. Balabanis,et al.  Consumer Attitudes Towards Multi-Channel Retailers' Web Sites: The Role of Involvement, Brand Attitude, Internet Knowledge, and Visit Duration , 1970, Journal of Business Strategies.

[4]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[5]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 1983 .

[6]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion , 1984 .

[7]  G. Laurent,et al.  Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles , 1985 .

[8]  C. F. Kao,et al.  Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .

[9]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[10]  B. Sternthal,et al.  The Effects of Knowledge, Motivation, and Type of Message on Ad Processing and Product Judgments , 1990 .

[11]  Kenneth R. Lord,et al.  Picture-Based Persuasion Processes and the Moderating Role of Involvement , 1991 .

[12]  Jonathan Steuer,et al.  Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence , 1992 .

[13]  Tina M. Lowrey,et al.  The interaction of endorser attractiveness and involvement in persuasion depends on the goal that guides message processing , 1994 .

[14]  J. Zaichkowsky.  The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising , 1994 .

[15]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Color: How the Correspondence between Available and Required Resources Affects Attitudes , 1995 .

[16]  Ivana B. Petrović,et al.  Measuring consumer involvement , 1996 .

[17]  George M. Kasper,et al.  Animation in User Interfaces Designed for Decision Support Systems: The Effects of Image Abstraction, Transition, and Interactivity on Decision Quality* , 1997 .

[18]  E.,et al.  The evolution of theory and research in social psychology: From single to multiple effect and process models of persuasion. , 1997 .

[19]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  Interactive functions and their impacts on the appeal of internet presence sites , 1998 .

[20]  B. Calder,et al.  New media interactive advertising vs. traditional advertising , 1998 .

[21]  Eloise Coupey,et al.  Consumer Behavior and Unresolved Regulatory Issues in Electronic Marketing , 1998 .

[22]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[23]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences , 2000 .

[24]  W. Wood.  Attitude change: persuasion and social influence. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[26]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Interactivity, Information Processing, and Learning on the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[27]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  Consumer Perceptions of Privacy and Security Risks for Online Shopping , 2001 .

[28]  Hairong Li,et al.  Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads , 2002 .

[29]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[30]  William Haseman,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Influences of the Degree of Interactivity on User-Outcomes in a Multimedia Environment , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[31]  D. Stewart,et al.  From consumer response to active consumer: Measuring the effectiveness of interactive media , 2002 .

[32]  SHYAM SUNDAR,et al.  Explicating Web Site Interactivity , 2003, Commun. Res..

[33]  Naveen Donthu,et al.  The Impact Of Content And Design Elements On Banner Advertising Click-Through Rates , 2003 .

[34]  Yuping Liu,et al.  Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[35]  Arthur A. Raney,et al.  At the movies, on the Web: An investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive Web content on site and brand evaluations , 2003 .

[36]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Theorizing Interactivity's Effects , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[37]  P. Ballantine.  Effects of interactivity and product information on consumer satisfaction in an online retail setting , 2005 .

[38]  María Sicilia,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERACTIVITY IN A WEB SITE: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition , 2005 .

[39]  D. Fortin,et al.  Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement , 2005 .

[40]  Byung-Kwan Lee,et al.  The Moderating Effects of Expectation on the Patterns of the Interactivity-Attitude Relationship , 2007 .