PEER REVIEW IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT SCIENCES: PREVALENCE AND EFFECTS OF REVIEWER HOSTILITY, BIAS, AND DISSENSUS

This article presents a letter from the editors which discusses the effects of peer reviews in the organizational and management sciences. Peer reviews are discussed in how they can critique a beli...

[1]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[2]  H. Zuckerman.  The sociology of science. , 1988 .

[3]  Alfred de Grazia,et al.  The Scientific Reception System and Dr. Velikovsky , 1963 .

[4]  Janice Beyer Lodahl,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. , 1972 .

[5]  R. Gephart.  Qualitative Research and the Academy of Management Journal , 2004 .

[6]  Lawrence R. Jauch,et al.  WHAT THEY DO WHEN THEY GET YOUR MANUSCRIPT: A SURVEY OF ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWER PRACTICES , 1989 .

[7]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Publishing as Prostitution? – Choosing Between One's Own Ideas and Academic Success , 2003 .

[8]  Lowell L. Hargens,et al.  Neglected considerations in the analysis of agreement among journal referees , 1990, Scientometrics.

[9]  A. Bedeian.  Thoughts on the Making and Remaking of the Management Discipline , 1996 .

[10]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Interreferee agreement on some characteristics of manuscripts submitted to the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. , 1974 .

[11]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  How Much Better are the Most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Samuel Ball,et al.  Interjudgmental reliability of reviews for the Journal of Educational Psychology.. , 1981 .

[13]  M. Mahoney.  Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system , 1977, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[14]  S. Ceci,et al.  Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again , 1982, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  J. Ravetz.  Sociology of Science , 1972, Nature.

[16]  Leonard D. Goodstein,et al.  Psychology of Scientist: XXX. Credibility of Psychologists: An Empirical Study , 1970 .

[17]  J. Pfeffer.  Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable , 1993 .

[18]  Marshall Schminke.  From the Editors: Raising the Bamboo Curtain , 2004 .

[19]  Stephen D. Gottfredson,et al.  Evaluating psychological research reports: Dimensions, reliability, and correlates of quality judgments. , 1978 .

[20]  D. Cicchetti.  The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[21]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Unintelligible Management Research and Academic Prestige , 1980 .

[22]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Turning Lemons into Lemonade , 2003 .

[23]  S B Bavdekar,et al.  Taking stock and looking ahead. , 2004, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[24]  D. Chambers.  Raising the Bamboo Curtain , 1980 .

[25]  J. M. Beyer,et al.  The Review Process and the Fates of Manuscripts Submitted to AMJ , 1995 .

[26]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  The Manuscript Review Process , 2003 .

[27]  J. Katz,et al.  The Human Equation: Building Profits by Putting People First , 1998 .

[28]  S. Rynes,et al.  What Makes Management Research Interesting, And Why Does It Matter? , 2006 .

[29]  Observations on "Anatomy of an R&R" and Other Reflections , 2006 .

[30]  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin: Editorial Comment , 1975 .

[31]  Robert H. Ashton,et al.  A review and analysis of research on the test–retest reliability of professional judgment , 2000 .

[32]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Everything You've Always Wanted to Know about AMJ (But May Have Been Afraid to Ask) , 2005 .

[33]  Grover J. Whitehurst,et al.  Interrater agreement for journal manuscript reviews. , 1984 .

[34]  S. Scarr,et al.  The reliability of reviews for the American Psychologist. , 1978 .

[35]  G W Timm,et al.  Editorial Comment , 2001, International Journal of Impotence Research.

[36]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[37]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility , 2005 .

[38]  J. Armstrong,et al.  Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation , 1997 .

[39]  Sara L. Rynes,et al.  From the Editors Taking Stock and Looking Ahead , 2005 .