Prediction of Geomagnetic Activity and Key Parameters in High-Latitude Ionosphere-Basic Elements

Prediction of geomagnetic activity and related events in the Earth's magnetosphere and ionosphere is an important task of the Space Weather program. Prediction reliability is dependent on the prediction method and elements included in the prediction scheme. Two main elements are a suitable geomagnetic activity index and coupling function -- the combination of solar wind parameters providing the best correlation between upstream solar wind data and geomagnetic activity. The appropriate choice of these two elements is imperative for any reliable prediction model. The purpose of this work was to elaborate on these two elements -- the appropriate geomagnetic activity index and the coupling function -- and investigate the opportunity to improve the reliability of the prediction of geomagnetic activity and other events in the Earth's magnetosphere. The new polar magnetic index of geomagnetic activity and the new version of the coupling function lead to a significant increase in the reliability of predicting the geomagnetic activity and some key parameters, such as cross-polar cap voltage and total Joule heating in high-latitude ionosphere, which play a very important role in the development of geomagnetic and other activity in the Earth s magnetosphere, and are widely used as key input parameters in modeling magnetospheric, ionospheric, and thermospheric processes.

[1]  D. Knipp,et al.  Direct and Indirect Thermospheric Heating Sources for Solar Cycles 21–23 , 2004 .

[2]  R. Roble,et al.  Magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere coupling: Effect of neutral winds on energy transfer and field‐aligned current , 1995 .

[3]  P. Stauning,et al.  Unified PCN and PCS indices: Method of calculation, physical sense, and dependence on the IMF azimuthal and northward components , 2006 .

[4]  Matthew G. McHarg,et al.  Polar cap index as a proxy for hemispheric Joule heating , 1999 .

[5]  Ronen Marmorstein 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER , 2006 .

[6]  B. Tsurutani,et al.  The efficiency of “viscous interaction” between the solar wind and the magnetosphere during intense northward IMF events , 1995 .

[7]  Matthew G. McHarg,et al.  High‐latitude Joule heating response to IMF inputs , 2005 .

[8]  Matthew G. McHarg,et al.  Joule heating patterns as affunction of polar cap index , 2002 .

[9]  Arthur D. Richmond,et al.  Mapping electrodynamic features of the high-latitude ionosphere from localized observations: technique , 1988 .

[10]  Syun-Ichi Akasofu,et al.  A study of geomagnetic storms , 1978 .

[11]  H. Gleisner,et al.  Response of the auroral electrojets to the solar wind modeled with neural networks , 1997 .

[12]  E. Kihn,et al.  Polar cap index comparisons with AMIE cross polar cap potential, electric field, and polar cap area , 2004 .

[13]  P. Newell,et al.  Solar illumination as cause of the equinoctial preference for geomagnetic activity , 2001 .