A non-retraction path planning approach for extrusion-based additive manufacturing

Abstract Notwithstanding the widespread use and large number of advantages over traditional subtractive manufacturing techniques, the application of additive manufacturing technologies is currently limited by the undesirable fabricating efficiency, which has attracted attentions from a wide range of areas, such as fabrication method, material improvement, and algorithm optimization. As a critical step in the process planning of additive manufacturing, path planning plays a significant role in affecting the build time by means of determining the paths for the printing head's movement. So a novel path filling pattern for the deposition of extrusion–based additive manufacturing is developed in this paper, mainly to avoid the retraction during the deposition process, and hence the time moving along these retracting paths can be saved and the discontinuous deposition can be avoided as well. On the basis of analysis and discussion of the reason behind the occurrence of retraction in the deposition process, a path planning strategy called “go and back” is presented to avoid the retraction issue. The “go and back” strategy can be adopted to generate a continuous extruder path for simple areas with the start point being connected to the end point. So a sliced layer can be decomposed into several simple areas and the sub-paths for each area are generated based on the proposed strategy. All of these obtainable sub-paths can be connected into a continuous path with proper selection of the start point. By doing this, separated sub-paths are joined with each other to decrease the number of the startup and shutdown process for the extruder, which is beneficial for the enhancement of the deposition quality and the efficiency. Additionally, some methodologies are proposed to further optimize the generated non-retraction paths. At last, several cases are used to test and verify the developed methodology and the comparisons with conventional path filling patterns are conducted. The results show that the proposed approach can effectively reduce the retraction motions and is especially beneficial for the high efficient additive manufacturing without compromise on the part resistance.

[1]  Tong Mei,et al.  Interface between CAD and Rapid Prototyping systems. Part 2: LMI — An improved interface , 1997 .

[2]  Seok-Hee Lee,et al.  Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling , 2009 .

[3]  Yong He,et al.  An Adaptive Tool Path Generation for Fused Deposition Modeling , 2013 .

[4]  S. Dinesh Kumar,et al.  Parameter Optimization of ABS-M30i Parts Produced by Fused Deposition Modeling for Minimum Surface Roughness , 2014 .

[5]  Tawfik T. El-Midany,et al.  Toolpath Pattern Comparison: Contour-Parallel with Direction-Parallel , 2006, Geometric Modeling and Imaging--New Trends (GMAI'06).

[6]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Automated torch path planning using polygon subdivision for solid freeform fabrication based on welding , 2004 .

[7]  Tong Mei,et al.  Interface between CAD and Rapid Prototyping systems. Part 1: A study of existing interfaces , 1997 .

[8]  Sarat Singamneni,et al.  Adaptive slicing and speed- and time-dependent consolidation mechanisms in fused deposition modeling , 2014 .

[9]  Kaufui Wong,et al.  A Review of Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[10]  B. J. Alvarez,et al.  Dimensional accuracy improvement of FDM square cross-section parts using artificial neural networks and an optimization algorithm , 2013 .

[11]  Dominic Cuiuri,et al.  A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing , 2014, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[12]  Bahattin Koc,et al.  Smoothing STL files by Max‐Fit biarc curves for rapid prototyping , 2000 .

[13]  John G. Michopoulos,et al.  Implicit slicing for functionally tailored additive manufacturing , 2016, Comput. Aided Des..

[14]  Ibrahim T. Ozbolat,et al.  Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[15]  Sang C. Park,et al.  Contour-parallel offset machining without tool-retractions , 2003, Comput. Aided Des..

[16]  Brian K. Paul,et al.  Effect of Layer Thickness and Orientation Angle on Surface Roughness in Laminated Object Manufacturing , 2001 .

[17]  Ching-chih Wei,et al.  Development of a hybrid rapid prototyping system using low-cost fused deposition modeling and five-axis machining , 2014 .

[18]  Steve Marschner,et al.  Matching Real Fabrics with Micro-Appearance Models , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[19]  Yong He,et al.  Optimization of tool-path generation for material extrusion-based additive manufacturing technology ☆ , 2014 .

[20]  Zhiwei Lin,et al.  A robust 2D point-sequence curve offset algorithm with multiple islands for contour-parallel tool path , 2013, Comput. Aided Des..

[21]  Daniel Cohen-Or,et al.  Connected fermat spirals for layered fabrication , 2016, ACM Trans. Graph..

[22]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Finishing of Fused Deposition Modeling parts by CNC machining , 2016 .

[23]  Sanjay B. Joshi,et al.  Parametric error modeling and software error compensation for rapid prototyping , 2003 .

[24]  Sanjay B. Joshi,et al.  Software compensation of rapid prototyping machines , 2004 .

[25]  Bin Huang,et al.  Curved Layer Adaptive Slicing (CLAS) for fused deposition modelling , 2015 .

[26]  Wei Sun,et al.  Direct slicing of STEP based NURBS models for layered manufacturing , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[27]  N. Venkata Reddy,et al.  Part deposition orientation studies in layered manufacturing , 2007 .

[28]  Gershon Elber,et al.  C1 Continuous Toolpath Generation Toward 5-axis High Speed Machining , 2006 .

[29]  S. H. Choi,et al.  A dynamic priority-based approach to concurrent toolpath planning for multi-material layered manufacturing , 2010, Comput. Aided Des..

[30]  Li Lun.  Contour-parallel tool-path linking method without tool-retraction for complex-pocket , 2010 .

[31]  Hyun-Chul Kim,et al.  Optimum tool path generation for 2.5D direction-parallel milling with incomplete mesh model , 2010 .

[32]  Jianhua Mo,et al.  Sloping wall structure support generation for fused deposition modeling , 2009 .

[33]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Modelling micro geometrical profiles in fused deposition process , 2012 .

[34]  Martin Held,et al.  A smooth spiral tool path for high speed machining of 2D pockets , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[35]  Guoqing Jin,et al.  A hybrid and adaptive tool-path generation approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing for biomedical models , 2013, Comput. Ind..

[36]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method , 2009 .

[37]  Rebecca K. Kramer,et al.  Direct Writing of Gallium‐Indium Alloy for Stretchable Electronics , 2014 .

[38]  Shi Yusheng,et al.  Support fast generation algorithm based on discrete‐marking in stereolithgraphy rapid prototyping , 2011 .

[39]  Bor-Tyng Sheen,et al.  Robust Spiral Tool-Path Generation for Arbitrary Pockets , 2001 .

[40]  Sanjay B. Joshi,et al.  Error compensation for fused deposition modeling (FDM) machine by correcting slice files , 2008 .

[41]  Kai Tang,et al.  An algorithm for reducing tool retractions in zigzag pocket machining , 1998, Comput. Aided Des..

[42]  Zhao Jibin.  Determination of optimal build orientation based on satisfactory degree theory for RPT , 2005, Ninth International Conference on Computer Aided Design and Computer Graphics (CAD-CG'05).

[43]  Hui Li,et al.  Quantitative analysis of surface profile in fused deposition modelling , 2015 .

[44]  Vamsi K. Yadavalli,et al.  Surface modification of fused deposition modeling ABS to enable rapid prototyping of biomedical microdevices , 2013 .

[45]  Robert J. Strong,et al.  A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling , 2014 .

[46]  John R. Tumbleston,et al.  Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects , 2015, Science.