Portfolio Choice Under Cumulative Prospect Theory: An Analytical Treatment

We formulate and carry out an analytical treatment of a single-period portfolio choice model featuring a reference point in wealth, S-shaped utility (value) functions with loss aversion, and probability weighting under Kahneman and Tversky's cumulative prospect theory (CPT). We introduce a new measure of loss aversion for large payoffs, called the large-loss aversion degree (LLAD), and show that it is a critical determinant of the well-posedness of the model. The sensitivity of the CPT value function with respect to the stock allocation is then investigated, which, as a by-product, demonstrates that this function is neither concave nor convex. We finally derive optimal solutions explicitly for the cases in which the reference point is the risk-free return and those in which it is not (while the utility function is piecewise linear), and we employ these results to investigate comparative statics of optimal risky exposures with respect to the reference point, the LLAD, and the curvature of the probability weighting. This paper was accepted by Wei Xiong, finance.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[2]  Peter P. Wakker,et al.  An index of loss aversion , 2005, J. Econ. Theory.

[3]  H. Markowitz.  The Utility of Wealth , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Weighing Risk and Uncertainty , 1995 .

[5]  D. Prelec.  The Probability Weighting Function , 1998 .

[6]  Marc Oliver Rieger,et al.  Too Risk-Averse for Prospect Theory? , 2010 .

[7]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function , 1996 .

[8]  Francisco Gomes.  Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with Loss Averse Investors , 2003 .

[9]  Mario Ghossoub.  Towards a Purely Behavioral Definition of Loss Aversion , 2011 .

[10]  Arjan Berkelaar,et al.  Optimal Portfolio Choice under Loss Aversion , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[11]  D. Denneberg.  Non-additive measure and integral , 1994 .

[12]  W. Shadwick,et al.  A Universal Performance Measure , 2002 .

[13]  Jaroslava Hlouskova,et al.  Optimal Asset Allocation under Quadratic Loss Aversion , 2012 .

[14]  Ming Huang,et al.  Stocks as Lotteries: The Implications of Probability Weighting for Security Prices , 2007 .

[15]  S. Legg,et al.  Dynamic Portfolio Choice and Asset Pricing with Narrow Framing and Probability Weighting , 2012 .

[16]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Gain, Loss, and Asset Pricing , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Mei Wang,et al.  Cumulative prospect theory and the St. Petersburg paradox , 2006 .

[18]  M. D. Vigna.  Financial market equilibria with heterogeneous agents: CAPM and market segmentation , 2013 .

[19]  H. Levy,et al.  Prospect Theory and Mean-Variance Analysis , 2004 .

[20]  M. Rásonyi,et al.  Optimal portfolio choice for a behavioural investor in continuous-time markets , 2012, 1202.0628.

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[22]  Jaroslava Hlouskova,et al.  What Does it Take for a Specific Prospect Theory Type Household to Engage in Risky Investment , 2012 .

[23]  Jaroslava Hlouskova,et al.  Capital income taxation and risk taking under prospect theory , 2012 .

[24]  Hanqing Jin,et al.  BEHAVIORAL PORTFOLIO SELECTION IN CONTINUOUS TIME , 2007, 0709.2830.

[25]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[26]  Optimal portfolio choice under loss aversion , 2004 .

[27]  N. Mankiw,et al.  The Consumption of Stockholders and Non-Stockholders , 1990 .

[28]  R. Thaler,et al.  Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle , 1993 .

[29]  C. Bernard,et al.  Static portfolio choice under Cumulative Prospect Theory , 2009 .

[30]  H. Levy,et al.  Existence of CAPM Equilibria with Prospect Theory Preferences , 2004 .

[31]  M. Abdellaoui.  Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions , 2000 .