The desirable irrigation system applies water at a rate that allows all water to infiltrate and distributes the water in space and time to match crop requirements in each parcel of the field. Various types of irrigation systems and management strategies have been developed in attempts to achieve the “desired” system. Our objective is to review various methods of enhancing irrigation performance. Although the “desired” system has not been attained, considerable improvements have been made based upon selection and management technologies which generate profits within the constraints of environmental prudence. Each irrigation system has inherent opportunities for enhancing irrigation performance. Like-wise, each has limitations in achieving maximum crop productivity per unit of applied water. Methods to improve the performance or surface irrigation can be grouped into those that increase the uniformity of water intake, reduce runoff losses, or decrease spatial variability. Two surface irrigation systems that enhance performance are surge-flow and level-basin. The uniformity and efficiency of sprinkler systems can be enhanced by computer-based design procedures and, in some cases, by applying low-energy, precision application concepts. Advantages of microirrigation are less surface area wetted, which minimizes evaporation and weed growth, and improved application uniformity which is specifically designed into the distribution network. An appropriate management strategy is necessary to attain the potential of an irrigation system engineered to match crop water requirements, and soil and environmental conditions. The best irrigation method applies the amount of water desired at the appropriate time while providing for leaching requirements, agronomic operations, and environmental considerations. With enhanced engineering and computer capabilities and improved knowledge of the soil-plant-water continuum, irrigators will adopt “prescription” irrigation. Prescription systems apply precisely the prescribed amounts of water, nutrients, and pesticides to match the production capacity of each parcel of land.
[1]
A. R. Dedrick.
Level-basin irrigation-an update.
,
1990
.
[2]
J. Philip,et al.
Theory of Infiltration
,
1969
.
[3]
E. Gordon Kruse.
Describing Irrigation Efficiency and Uniformity
,
1978
.
[4]
Wynn R. Walker,et al.
Furrow Advance Rates under Surge Flow Systems
,
1981
.
[5]
Wesley W. Wallender,et al.
Spatial Variability of Infiltration in Furrows
,
1985
.
[6]
E. Maas,et al.
CROP SALT TOLERANCE–CURRENT ASSESSMENT
,
1977
.
[7]
W. M. Lyle,et al.
lepa irrigation system evaluation
,
1983
.
[8]
W. M. Lyle,et al.
Low Energy Precision Application (LEPA) Irrigation System
,
1981
.
[9]
James E. Ayars,et al.
Maximizing water use efficiency with subsurface drip irrigation
,
1992
.
[10]
Roberto Testezlaf,et al.
Furrow Infiltration Under Surge Flow Irrigation
,
1987
.
[11]
Walter L. Trimmer.
Applying partial irrigation in Pakistan.
,
1990
.
[12]
Allan S. Humpherys.
Surge Irrigation: 2. Management
,
1989
.
[13]
R. B. Hutmacher,et al.
ADVANTAGES OF SUBSURFACE IRRIGATION FOR PROCESSING TOMATOES
,
1987
.
[14]
Mohammad H. Alemi,et al.
Comparison of Surge and Continuous Flow Irrigation in California
,
1987
.
[15]
C. J. Gerard.
Furrow Diking and Subsoiling Studies in the Rolling Plains.
,
1987
.
[16]
T. Howell,et al.
Management of Farm Irrigation Systems
,
1990
.
[17]
D. L. Reddell,et al.
COMPONENTS FOR AN ADVANCE RATE FEEDBACK IRRIGATION SYSTEM (ARHS)
,
1990
.
[18]
Dale F. Heermann,et al.
Integrated Water-Energy Management System for Center Pivot Irrigation: Implementation
,
1984
.
[19]
G. Fipps,et al.
Six years of LEPA in Texas-less water, higher yields.
,
1990
.
[20]
J. R. Gilley.
Suitability of Reduced Pressure Center-Pivots
,
1984
.
[21]
K. R. Davis,et al.
A Lysimeter Feedback Irrigation Controller System for Evapotranspiration Measurements and Real Time Irrigation Scheduling
,
1989
.