The Relation of Calculated Plasma Volume Status to Sublingual Microcirculatory Blood Flow and Organ Injury

Background: The calculated plasma volume status (cPVS) was validated as a surrogate of intravascular filling. The aim of this study is to assess the cPVS in relation to sublingual perfusion and organ injury. Methods: Pre- and postoperative cPVS were obtained by determining the actual and ideal plasma volume levels in surgical patients. The sublingual microcirculation was assessed using SDF imaging, and we determined the De Backer score, the Consensus Proportion of Perfused Vessels (Consensus PPV), and the Consensus PPV (small). Our primary outcome was the assessment of the distribution of cPVS and its association with intraoperative sublingual microcirculation and postoperative complications. Results: The median pre- and postoperative cPVS were −7.25% (IQR −14.29–−1.88) and −0.4% (IQR −5.43–6.06), respectively (p < 0.001). The mean intraoperative administered fluid volume was 2.5 ± 2.5 L (1.14 L h−1). No statistically significant correlation was observed between the pre- or postoperative cPVS and sublingual microcirculation variables. Higher preoperative (OR = 1.04, p = 0.098) and postoperative cPVS (OR = 1.057, p = 0.029) were associated with postoperative organ injury and complications (sepsis (30%), anemia (24%), respiratory failure (13%), acute kidney injury (6%), hypotension (6%), stroke (3%)). Conclusions: The calculated PVS was associated with an increased risk of organ injury and complications in this cohort.

[1]  H. Holik,et al.  Higher estimated plasma volume status is associated with increased thrombotic risk and impaired survival in patients with primary myelofibrosis , 2023, Biochemia medica.

[2]  A. Chalkias,et al.  Association between mean arterial pressure and sublingual microcirculation during major non‐cardiac surgery: Post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort , 2023, Microcirculation.

[3]  A. Fasano,et al.  A theoretical model for the Fåhræus effect in medium-large microvessels. , 2022, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  Xuejin Li,et al.  Quantifying shear-induced margination and adhesion of platelets in microvascular blood flow. , 2022, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  A. Chalkias,et al.  Association of Preoperative Basal Inflammatory State, Measured by Plasma suPAR Levels, with Intraoperative Sublingual Microvascular Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Non-Cardiac Surgery , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[6]  A. Chalkias,et al.  Microcirculation-guided treatment improves tissue perfusion and hemodynamic coherence in surgical patients with septic shock , 2022, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[7]  S. Grundmann,et al.  Estimated plasma volume status is a modest predictor of true plasma volume excess in compensated chronic heart failure patients , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  A. Chalkias,et al.  Elevated preoperative suPAR is a strong and independent risk marker for postoperative complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery (SPARSE). , 2021, Surgery.

[9]  R. Stephens,et al.  Calculated Plasma Volume Status Is Associated With Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2021, Critical care explorations.

[10]  A. Chalkias,et al.  Sublingual microcirculatory alterations during the immediate and early postoperative period: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, medRxiv.

[11]  I. Komuro,et al.  Clinical impact of estimated plasma volume status and its additive effect with the GRACE risk score on in-hospital and long-term mortality for acute myocardial infarction , 2021, International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature.

[12]  B. Pitt,et al.  Estimated plasma volume status in heart failure: clinical implications and future directions , 2021, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[13]  M. Monaghan,et al.  Calculated plasma volume status predicts outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2020, Open Heart.

[14]  K. Iseki,et al.  Impact of calculated plasma volume status on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: 4-year nationwide community-based prospective cohort study , 2020, PloS one.

[15]  D. Annane,et al.  Intravenous fluid therapy in the perioperative and critical care setting: Executive summary of the International Fluid Academy (IFA) , 2020, Annals of Intensive Care.

[16]  C. Ince,et al.  Microcirculation: Physiology, Pathophysiology, and Clinical Application , 2019, Blood Purification.

[17]  J. Aronson,et al.  STROCSS 2019 Guideline: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery. , 2019, International journal of surgery.

[18]  T. Morita,et al.  Prognostic Value of Calculated Plasma Volume Status in Patients Admitted for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ― A Prospective Comparative Study With Other Indices of Plasma Volume ― , 2019, Circulation reports.

[19]  M. Drazner,et al.  Prognostic implications of plasma volume status estimates in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights from TOPCAT , 2019, European journal of heart failure.

[20]  P. Martens,et al.  The Optimal Plasma Volume Status in Heart Failure in Relation to Clinical Outcome. , 2019, Journal of cardiac failure.

[21]  S. Kolvekar,et al.  Calculated plasma volume status and outcomes in patients undergoing coronary bypass graft surgery , 2019, Heart.

[22]  P. Myles,et al.  Perioperative Fluid Therapy for Major Surgery , 2019, Anesthesiology.

[23]  F. Carli,et al.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018 , 2018, World Journal of Surgery.

[24]  P. Baxter,et al.  Time to Reconsider the Role of Relative Blood Volume Monitoring for Fluid Management in Hemodialysis , 2018, ASAIO journal.

[25]  M. Fudim,et al.  Calculated Estimates of Plasma Volume in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure-Comparison With Measured Volumes. , 2018, Journal of cardiac failure.

[26]  Y. Takeishi,et al.  Plasma volume status predicts prognosis in patients with acute heart failure syndromes , 2018, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[27]  K. Leslie,et al.  Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  J. Bakker,et al.  Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine , 2018, Intensive Care Medicine.

[29]  W. Tang,et al.  Intrarenal Flow Alterations During Transition From Euvolemia to Intravascular Volume Expansion in Heart Failure Patients. , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[30]  K. Fearon,et al.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[31]  B. Pitt,et al.  Prognostic Value of Estimated Plasma Volume in Heart Failure. , 2015, JACC. Heart failure.

[32]  J. Cohn,et al.  Calculated plasma volume status and prognosis in chronic heart failure , 2015, European journal of heart failure.

[33]  C. Ince,et al.  Direct markers of organ perfusion to guide fluid therapy: when to start, when to stop. , 2014, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[34]  J. Bakker,et al.  Microvascular Perfusion as a Target for Fluid Resuscitation in Experimental Circulatory Shock* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[35]  Ryan Arnold,et al.  The microcirculation image quality score: development and preliminary evaluation of a proposed approach to grading quality of image acquisition for bedside videomicroscopy. , 2013, Journal of critical care.

[36]  V. Pilvinis,et al.  Microcirculatory blood flow as a tool to select ICU patients eligible for fluid therapy , 2012, Intensive Care Medicine.

[37]  K. Walley,et al.  Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: A positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality* , 2011 .

[38]  R. Pearse,et al.  Haemodynamic optimisation improves tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation after major surgery: a randomised controlled trial , 2010, Critical care.

[39]  J. Vincent,et al.  Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis , 2010, Intensive Care Medicine.

[40]  R. A. Howlett,et al.  Muscle‐specific VEGF deficiency greatly reduces exercise endurance in mice , 2009, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  Didier Payen,et al.  A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure , 2008, Critical care.

[42]  Johannes G. G. Dobbe,et al.  Measurement of functional microcirculatory geometry and velocity distributions using automated image analysis , 2008, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[43]  S. Einav,et al.  Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Management on Outcome after Intraabdominal Surgery , 2005, Anesthesiology.

[44]  F. Pott,et al.  Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[45]  A. Pries,et al.  Blood viscosity in tube flow: dependence on diameter and hematocrit. , 1992, The American journal of physiology.

[46]  Y. Fung,et al.  Inversion of Fahraeus effect and effect of mainstream flow on capillary hematocrit. , 1977, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[47]  S. Schenker,et al.  The liver in congestive heart failure: a review. , 1973, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[48]  R. Fåhraeus THE SUSPENSION STABILITY OF THE BLOOD , 1929 .

[49]  M. Vaduganathan,et al.  Water and Sodium in Heart Failure: A Spotlight on Congestion , 2014, Heart Failure Reviews.