Predictions of Speech Intelligibility with a Model of the Normal and Impaired Auditory-periphery

A fall-off in speech intelligibility at higher-than-normal presentation levels has been observed for listeners with and without hearing loss (Studebaker et al., 1999; Dubno et al., 2005; Molis and Summers, 2003; Shanks et al., 2002). Speech intelligibility predictors based on the acoustic signal properties, such as the articulation index and speech transmission index, cannot directly account for the effects of presentation level and hearing impairment. Recently, Elhilali et al. (2003) introduced the spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI), a speech intelligibility predictor based on a model of how the auditory cortex analyzes the joint spectro-temporal modulations present in speech. However, the auditory-periphery model used by Elhilali et al. is very simple and cannot describe many of the nonlinear, level-dependent properties of cochlear processing, nor the effect of hair cell impairment on this processing. In this study, we quantify the effects of speech presentation level and cochlear impairment on speech intelligibility using the STMI with a more physiologically-accurate model of the normal and impaired auditory periphery developed by Zilany and Bruce (2006). This model can accurately represent the auditory-nerve responses to a wide variety of stimuli across a range of characteristic frequencies and intensities spanning the dynamic range of hearing. In addition, outer and inner hair cell impairment can be incorporated. Compared to experimental word recognition scores, this model-based STMI can qualitatively predict the effect of presentation levels on speech intelligibility for both normal and impaired listeners in a wide variety of conditions

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  A novel signal-processing strategy for hearing-aid design: neurocompensation , 2004, Signal Process..

[2]  S. Shamma,et al.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  G. Studebaker,et al.  Intensity-importance functions for bandlimited monosyllabic words. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Richard H. Wilson,et al.  Speech Recognition Performance of Patients with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Under Unaided and Aided Conditions Using Linear and Compression Hearing Aids , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[5]  Eric D Young,et al.  Effects of high sound levels on responses to the vowel /ε/ in cat auditory nerve , 1998, Hearing Research.

[6]  Ian C Bruce Physiological assessment of contrast-enhancing frequency shaping and multiband compression in hearing aids. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Ian C. Bruce,et al.  Representation of the vowel /ε/ in normal and impaired auditory nerve fibers: Model predictions of responses in cats , 2007 .

[8]  Muhammad S A Zilany,et al.  Modeling auditory-nerve responses for high sound pressure levels in the normal and impaired auditory periphery. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[10]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility , 2003, Speech Commun..

[11]  Michelle R. Molis,et al.  Effects of high presentation levels on recognition of low- and high-frequency speech , 2003 .

[12]  Murray B. Sachs,et al.  Biological Basis of Hearing-Aid Design , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  J. Ahlstrom,et al.  Recognition of filtered words in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores with and without increases in masking. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Word recognition in noise at higher-than-normal levels: decreases in scores and increases in masking. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. Studebaker,et al.  Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.