Abstract Cross-ventilation is a mechanism using the pressure difference between the outdoor environment and indoor space to provide an energy-saving method for ventilation design. Since the ventilating flow in the vicinity of the opening is highly turbulent and unsteady, the ideal numerical method to resolve the structure of the ventilating flow is by using a time-dependent approach such as large eddy simulation (LES). However, LES requires large computing resources and there are also some uncertainties associated with the discretisation of time scales and length scales of turbulence. Therefore, an alternative has been sought. This study compared the flow simulations computed by the standard k-ε, RNG k-ε, standard k-ω and SST k-ω models as well as LES and all the results were compared with experimental measurement data. The main findings concluded that the SST k-ω model was able to depict the flow features satisfactorily and that the calculation of flow rate was also accurate under various wind directions.
[1]
Yoshihiko Akamine,et al.
Local Dynamic Similarity Model of Cross-Ventilation Part 1 - Theoretical Framework
,
2004
.
[2]
F. Menter.
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications
,
1994
.
[3]
Per Heiselberg,et al.
Natural Ventilation Design
,
2004
.
[4]
J. P. V. Doormaal,et al.
ENHANCEMENTS OF THE SIMPLE METHOD FOR PREDICTING INCOMPRESSIBLE FLUID FLOWS
,
1984
.
[5]
Leslie M. Smith,et al.
Renormalization group analysis of turbulence
,
2003
.
[6]
P. Libby,et al.
Analysis of Turbulent Boundary Layers
,
1974
.
[7]
Timothy J. Barth,et al.
The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes
,
1989
.
[8]
B. Launder,et al.
Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence
,
1972
.
[9]
S. Orszag,et al.
Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. Basic theory
,
1986
.