Teaching the History of the English Language. Its position in the university curriculum and its relation to linguistic theory
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Denison. The Old English impersonals revived , 1990 .
[2] O. Fischer. On the Status of Grammaticalisation and the Diachronic Dimension in Explanation , 1997 .
[3] Fiona Cowie,et al. THE LOGICAL PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 1997, Synthese.
[4] O. Fischer. The development of quasi-auxiliaries in English and changes in word order , 1994 .
[5] P. Kiparsky. Linguistic universals and linguistic change , 1968 .
[6] O. Fischer,et al. Optional vs radical re-analysis: mechanisms of syntactic change [Review of: D.W. Lightfoot (1979) Principles of diachronic syntax] , 1981 .
[7] David Lightfoot,et al. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change , 1991 .
[8] John Haiman,et al. Iconic and Economic Motivation , 1983 .
[9] O. Fischer,et al. A 'case' for the old English impersonal , 1987 .
[10] O. Fischer. The status of to in Old English to-infinitives: A reply to Kageyama , 1996 .
[11] Bruce Mitchell,et al. Old English Syntax , 1985 .
[12] Wim van der Wurff,et al. The Syntax of Early English , 2001 .
[13] David Lightfoot,et al. Principles of diachronic syntax , 1979 .
[14] O. Jespersen. A modern English grammar on historical principles , 1928 .
[15] Brian D. Joseph,et al. Diachronic explanation: putting speakers back into the picture , 1992 .
[16] Patrick Duffley,et al. The English infinitive , 1993 .
[17] S. Fender. The New York Review of Books , 1986 .
[18] Alice C. Harris,et al. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Extension , 1995 .
[19] David Denison,et al. English Historical Syntax , 1993 .
[20] Internal and external factors in syntactic change , 1992 .