Title I and Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Federal Evaluation Results

Despite the seeming wealth of Title I evaluation information, the educational effectiveness of the program has remained debatable. Inconsistent findings can be attributed to variations in evaluation methods. Nevertheless, results from key studies have contributed to a conventional wisdom concerning Title I and student achievement. In contrast to previous reviews, this study employed metaanalytic techniques to assess the overall impact of the program on achievement and to examine the effects of mediating methodological and programmatic factors. The data were derived from 17 federal studies, ranging from 1966 to 1993, from which 657 unique effect sizes were derived. Results indicated a modest overall impact of Title I. However, the mediating factors were significant predictors. After controlling for these effects, Title I effect sizes were more favorable as the program matured. This finding may be attributable to expanded federal oversight and the growing focus on program improvement that has evolved over the years.

[1]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[2]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Random effects models. , 1994 .

[3]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Fixed-Effects Models , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Combining estimates of effect size. , 1994 .

[5]  R. Rosenthal.  Parametric measures of effect size. , 1994 .

[6]  Michael J. Puma,et al.  Prospects: The Congressionally Mandated Study of Educational Growth and Opportunity. The Interim Report. , 1993 .

[7]  A. Davis.  Upping the Stakes: Using Gain Scores to Judge Local Program Effectiveness in Chapter 1 , 1991 .

[8]  R. Slavin,et al.  Effective Programs for Students At Risk , 1990 .

[9]  B. Sinclair,et al.  A Summary of State Chapter 1 Participation and Achievement Information for 1985-86. , 1988 .

[10]  Kenneth K. Wong,et al.  When Federalism Works , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[11]  Mary M. Kennedy,et al.  The Effectiveness of Chapter 1 Services. Second Interim Report from the National Assessment of Chapter 1. , 1986 .

[12]  Roy H. Forbes.  Academic Achievement of Historically Lower-Achieving Students during the Seventies. , 1985 .

[13]  Virginia R. L. Plunkett.  From Title I to Chapter 1: The Evolution of Compensatory Education. , 1985 .

[14]  L. Carter.  The Sustaining Effects Study of Compensatory and Elementary Education , 1984 .

[15]  Anita A. Summers,et al.  Is More Better? The Effectiveness of Spending on Compensatory Education. , 1983 .

[16]  Virginia R. L. Plunkett,et al.  Closing the Gap: A Historical Perspective on the Effectiveness of Compensatory Education. , 1983 .

[17]  G. K. Tallmadge.  AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF NORM-REFERENCED EVALUATION METHODOLOGY , 1982 .

[18]  Robert M. Stonehill,et al.  Measuring the Effects of Compensatory Education--Searching for Convergence from National, State and Local Evaluations. , 1982 .

[19]  L. Hedges.  Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators , 1981 .

[20]  R. Linn.  Discussion: Regression toward the Mean and the Interval between Test Administrations. , 1980 .

[21]  Validity of Inferences Based on the Proposed Title I Evaluation Models , 1979 .

[22]  R. Collins,et al.  Summer learning and the effects of schooling , 1978 .

[23]  Joy A. Frechtling,et al.  The Effects of Services on Student Development. , 1977 .

[24]  Jane L. David,et al.  Research on the Effectiveness of Compensatory Education Programs: A Reanalysis of Data. Final Report. , 1977 .

[25]  Title I, 1965-1975: Synthesis of the Findings of Federal Studies. , 1977 .

[26]  Robert J. Rossi.  Summaries of Major Title I Evaluations, 1966-1976. , 1977 .

[27]  Jane L. David,et al.  An Analysis of Longitudinal Data from Compensatory Education Programs. , 1977 .

[28]  C. Abt,et al.  The Evaluation of Social Programs , 1977 .

[29]  David H. Kaskowitz,et al.  A Study of the Norm-Referenced Procedure for Evaluating Project Effectiveness as Applied in the Evaluation of Project Information Packages. Research Memorandum. , 1977 .

[30]  Sol H. Pelavin,et al.  Patterns in ESEA Title I Reading Achievement. , 1976 .

[31]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Evaluation studies : review annual , 1976 .

[32]  R. Murnane,et al.  The Impact of School Resources on the Learning of Inner City Children. , 1976 .

[33]  M. Wargo.  ESEA Title I: A Reanalysis and Synthesis of Evaluation Data from Fiscal Year 1965 Through 1970. Final Report. , 1972 .

[34]  D. P. Hayes,et al.  The School Year and Vacations: When Do Students Learn?. , 1969 .

[35]  E. Mosbaek.  Analysis of Compensatory Education in Five School Districts. Volume I: Summary. Final Report. , 1968 .

[36]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Stability and change in human characteristics , 1966 .