Effects of a secondary task on the accuracy of single aiming movements.

Recently, Schmidt, Zelaznik, and Frank and Schmidt, Zelaznik, Hawkins, Frank, and Quinn have demonstrated that in rapid, single aiming movements, variability in the movement's kinetic requirements resulted in variability in the movement's amplitude. This new explanation of the speed-accuracy trade-off in motor control, however, does not predict or explain inaccuracy for slower movements (greater than 200 msec). In the two experiments reported, we demonstrate that the Schmidt et al. model can predict variability in slow aiming movements if attention is occupied with an additional task. Subjects were required to perform single aiming movements in either 500 (Experiment 1) or 200 (Experiment 2) msec. In both experiments, the movement amplitude (30, 45, 60, and 75 cm in Experiment 1, and 10, 20, and 30 cm in Experiment 2) and the probability of an auditory probe-reaction time (RT) task were manipulated. Results indicated that only when the movement time (MT) was 500 msec did the probe-RT task change the relationship between the effective target width and the movement's average velocity. This result extended the scope of the Schmidt et al. model to movements with a duration greater than 200 msec. In addition, it seems as though slow movements are controlled by attention-demanding mental processes.

[1]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[2]  H P BAHRICK,et al.  Extra-task performance as a measure of learning a primary task. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  P. Fitts The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Asatrian Dg,et al.  On the functional structure of the nervous system during movement control or preservation of a stationary posture. I. Mechanographic analysis of the action of a joint during the performance of a postural task , 1965 .

[5]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Movement control in skilled motor performance. , 1968 .

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Stephen J. Boies,et al.  Components of attention. , 1971 .

[8]  B. Kerr,et al.  Processing demands during mental operations , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[9]  W. Hays Statistics for the social sciences , 1973 .

[10]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[11]  Steven W. Keele,et al.  Attention and human performance , 1973 .

[12]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .

[13]  R. Schmidt Control Processes In Motor Skills , 1976, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[14]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  The attention demands of movements. , 1976, Journal of motor behavior.

[15]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Sources of Inaccuracy in Rapid Movement , 1978 .

[16]  M. Posner Chronometric explorations of mind : the third Paul M. Fitts lectures, delivered at the University of Michigan, September 1976 , 1978 .

[17]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  Testing Tapping Time-Sharing: Attention Demands of Movement Amplitude and Target Width , 1978 .

[18]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Processes controlling arm movements in monkeys. , 1978, Science.

[19]  D J Glencross,et al.  The planning of precision movements. , 1979, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[21]  Robert G Pachella,et al.  The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1 , 1973, Human Information Processing.