e-Document management in situated interactivity: the WIL approach

Complex organizations need to manage a large amount of information that their employees produce and use in the form of documents: therefore, information systems are adopted to access these documents in electronic format (e-documents) through Intranet or Internet. These documents are composed, organized and annotated in different ways according to the rules adopted by specific professional communities. Such rules reflect the different and peculiar culture and skills of the communities producing them. The large amount of information available today can be potentially accessed in real time. This has increased the need for syntactic and semantic characterization of documents and for tools that allow their effective access and exploitation on the Net, their easy retrieval and management, their annotation to adapt and personalize them on the base of users’ characteristics and diversities. This paper describes the approach adopted for the Web Indexing Language (WIL) system, a system conceived for supporting users interactivity during editing, indexing, and annotating e-documents on the basis of conventions adopted for their production and distribution. In particular, the approach capitalizes on the notion that the document layout reflects the relationships among the different semantic components of the document. The model and the architecture of the WIL system aim at improving e-document indexing, searching, editing and annotating, and at exploiting the description of the logical structure of the document itself to squeeze the information about the document content which are usually grasped by a reader at a glance.

[1]  Daniela Fogli,et al.  On electronic annotation and its implementation , 2004, AVI.

[2]  David A. Duce,et al.  Systems, interactions, and macrotheory , 2000, TCHI.

[3]  William I. Grosky,et al.  Narrowing the semantic gap - improved text-based web document retrieval using visual features , 2002, IEEE Trans. Multim..

[4]  Stelios C. Orphanoudakis,et al.  I2Cnet Medical Image Annotation Service (Short title: A Framework for Providing Medical Services over the World Wide Web) , 1997 .

[5]  Heikki Mannila,et al.  Retrieval from hierarchical texts by partial patterns , 1993, SIGIR.

[6]  Peter Bøgh Andersen,et al.  What Semiotics can and cannot do for HCI , 2001, Knowl. Based Syst..

[7]  Roger T. Pédauque Document: Form, Sign and Medium, As Reformulated for Electronic Documents , 2003 .

[8]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Embedding formal knowledge models in active documents , 1999, CACM.

[9]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Direct Manipulation Interfaces , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  William B. Lober,et al.  A Personal Annotated Image Server , 2000, AMIA.

[11]  William I. Grosky,et al.  Spatial Color Indexing Using Rotation, Translation, and Scale Invariant Anglograms , 2004, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[12]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Interface agents: metaphors with character , 1997 .

[13]  Brenda K. Laurel,et al.  Interface as Mimesis , 1986 .

[14]  Clarisse Sieckenius de Souza,et al.  Semiotic engineering: bringing designers and users together at interaction time , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[15]  Linda Schamber What Is a Document? Rethinking the Concept in Uneasy Times , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Stefano Levialdi,et al.  MADCOW: a multimedia digital annotation system , 2004, AVI.

[17]  William B. Lober,et al.  IML: An image markup language , 2001, AMIA.

[18]  Bohdan O. Szuprowicz,et al.  Multimedia Networking , 1995 .

[19]  Jane Hunter,et al.  Vannotea: A collaborative video indexing, annotation and discussion system for broadband networks , 2003 .

[20]  Piero Mussio,et al.  Specifying Dialog Control in Visual Interactive Systems , 1998, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[21]  Stefano Levialdi,et al.  Storing and Retrieving Multimedia Web Notes , 2005, DNIS.

[22]  Marian Petre,et al.  Usability Analysis of Visual Programming Environments: A 'Cognitive Dimensions' Framework , 1996, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[23]  T. Landauer,et al.  Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis , 1990 .

[24]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Open architecture multimedia documents , 1993, MULTIMEDIA '93.

[25]  S C Orphanoudakis,et al.  I2Cnet medical image annotation service. , 1997, Medical informatics = Medecine et informatique.

[26]  Marco Padula,et al.  Art teams up with technology through the net , 1999, INTR.

[27]  Linda Schamber What Is a Document? Rethinking the Concept in Uneasy Times , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Extending document management systems with user-specific active properties , 2000, TOIS.

[29]  Marco Padula,et al.  Using Shape to Index and Query Web Document Contents , 2002, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[30]  Ramana Rao,et al.  Bridging the paper and electronic worlds: the paper user interface , 1993, INTERCHI.

[31]  Piero Mussio,et al.  Specification and dialogue control of visual interaction through visual rewriting systems , 1999, TOPL.

[32]  William I. Grosky,et al.  Negotiating the semantic gap: from feature maps to semantic landscapes , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[33]  Bob Boiko,et al.  Content Management Bible , 2001 .

[34]  David Bargeron,et al.  Annotations for Streaming Video on the Web: System Design and Usage Studies , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[35]  Jens F. Jensen,et al.  Interactivity: Tracking a New Concept in Media and Communication Studies , 1998 .

[36]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Communication Technology: The New Media in Society , 1986 .

[37]  William B. Lober,et al.  A Portable Image Annotation Tool for Web-based Anatomy Atlases , 1999, AMIA.