A relatively simpleH∞ control law was defined in Part I (Grimble 1987). If a polynomial involving the cost-weights is strictly Hurwitz the control law simplifies even more. This is the situation which is exploited in the non- H∞, generalized minimum-variance control law found in most of the existing self-tuning control schemes. In systems having a unit time-delay the calculations for the H∞ controller become trivial. The cost-weights may be chosen to place some of the poles of the closed-loop system in desired locations if pole placement is required. The self-tuning algorithm presented is very similar to the indirect self-tuners based on LQG control laws. The choice of the cost-weights to improve the disturbance rejection and stability robustness properties of the design is discussed and the conditions when LQG and H∞controllers give a similar performance are established.
[1]
Björn Wittenmark,et al.
On Self Tuning Regulators
,
1973
.
[2]
David Clarke,et al.
Self-tuning control
,
1979
.
[3]
G. Stein,et al.
Multivariable feedback design: Concepts for a classical/modern synthesis
,
1981
.
[4]
Michael J. Grimble,et al.
Implicit and explicit LQG self-tuning controllers
,
1984,
Autom..
[5]
Jose B. Cruz,et al.
Feedback systems
,
1971
.
[6]
Bor-Sen Chen,et al.
Adaptive Control with robustness optimization
,
1986
.