Review of design optimization methods for turbomachinery aerodynamics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Rosa Cabecinhas,et al. Retratos de género nas notícias televisivas: uma análise das desigualdades por detrás da representação numérica , 2018, Estudos em Comunicação.
[2] Thomas Povey,et al. FLOvane: A New Approach for High-Pressure Vane Design , 2017 .
[3] Kwanjung Yee,et al. Optimal Arrangement of the Film Cooling Holes Considering the Manufacturing Tolerance for High Pressure Turbine Nozzle , 2016 .
[4] Can Ma,et al. Adjoint-based unsteady aerodynamic optimization of a transonic turbine stage , 2016 .
[5] Chun-wei Gu,et al. Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Optimization of a Multi-Stage Axial Compressor , 2016 .
[6] T. Povey,et al. FLOvane: A New Approach for HP Vane Design , 2016 .
[7] S. Zang,et al. Multi-Objective Optimization of the Impingement-Film Cooling Structure of a HPT Endwall Using Conjugate Heat Transfer CFD , 2016 .
[8] Wu Wenhua,et al. An Introduction of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Platform for Compressor Blade , 2016 .
[9] Kirill A. Vinogradov,et al. Robust Optimization of the HPT Blade Cooling and Aerodynamic Efficiency , 2016 .
[10] Bo Liu,et al. Optimization of Tandem Blade Based on Improved Particle Swarm Algorithm , 2016 .
[11] Gabriel Banks,et al. Gradient-Based Adjoint and Design of Experiment CFD Methodologies to Improve the Manufacturability of High Pressure Turbine Blades , 2016 .
[12] Feng Liu,et al. Aerodynamic Design Optimization of the Last Stage of a Multi-Stage Compressor by Using an Adjoint Method , 2016 .
[13] Feng Liu,et al. Adjoint-Response Surface Method in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Turbomachinery Blades , 2016 .
[14] Hirpa G. Lemu,et al. A High-Dimensional Model Representation Guided PSO Methodology With Application on Compressor Airfoil Shape Optimization , 2016 .
[15] M. Turner,et al. Flow Characteristics of an Optimized Axial Compressor Rotor Using Smooth Design Parameters , 2016 .
[16] Zhenping Feng,et al. Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization Design and Data Mining of a High Pressure Ratio Centrifugal Impeller , 2015 .
[17] Siva Nadarajah,et al. Optimum Shape Design for Multirow Turbomachinery Configurations Using a Discrete Adjoint Approach and an Efficient Radial Basis Function Deformation Scheme for Complex Multiblock Grids , 2015 .
[18] Siva Nadarajah,et al. An Adjoint-Based Multi-Point Optimization Method for Robust Turbomachinery Design , 2015 .
[19] Siva Nadarajah,et al. Adjoint-Based Constrained Aerodynamic Shape Optimization for Multistage Turbomachines , 2015 .
[20] Jiang Chen,et al. Aerodynamic optimization design for high pressure turbines based on the adjoint approach , 2015 .
[21] Nima Bahrani,et al. Multidisciplinary design optimization of turbomachinery blade , 2015 .
[22] Feng Liu,et al. Turbine Blade Row Optimization Through Endwall Contouring by an Adjoint Method , 2015 .
[23] J. D. Baar,et al. Stochastic Surrogates for Measurements and Computer Models of Fluids , 2014 .
[24] Shahrokh Shahpar,et al. Automatic Design Optimisation of Profiled Endwalls Including Real Geometrical Effects to Minimize Turbine Secondary Flows , 2014 .
[25] Ch. G. Gu,et al. A Novel Global Optimization Algorithm and Its Application to Airfoil Optimization , 2014 .
[26] K. Dalbey. Efficient and robust gradient enhanced Kriging emulators. , 2013 .
[27] Shahrokh Shahpar,et al. Aerodynamic Optimization of High-Pressure Turbines for Lean-Burn Combustion System , 2013 .
[28] Christian Frey,et al. Gradient Enhanced Surrogate Models Based on Adjoint CFD Methods for the Design of a Counter Rotating Turbofan , 2012 .
[29] Lucheng Ji,et al. Multi-Stage Turbomachinery Blades Optimization Design Using Adjoint Method and Thin Shear-Layer N-S Equations , 2012 .
[30] Giacomo Bruno Azzurro Persico,et al. Optimization of Turbomachinery Flow Surfaces Applying a CFD-Based Throughflow Method , 2012 .
[31] Liu He,et al. Three-Dimensional Aerodynamic Optimization for Axial-Flow Compressors Based on the Inverse Design and the Aerodynamic Parameters , 2012 .
[32] Kwang‐Yong Kim,et al. Axial-Flow Ventilation Fan Design Through Multi-Objective Optimization to Enhance Aerodynamic Performance , 2011 .
[33] Xi Yang,et al. Aerodynamic and heat transfer design optimization of internally cooling turbine blade based different surrogate models , 2011 .
[34] Zhenping Feng,et al. 2D Viscous Aerodynamic Shape Design Optimization for Turbine Blades Based on Adjoint Method , 2011 .
[35] C. Lacor,et al. Multi-objective optimization of turbomachinery using improved NSGA-II and approximation model , 2011 .
[36] Shahram Derakhshan,et al. The comparison of incomplete sensitivities and Genetic algorithms applications in 3D radial turbomachinery blade optimization , 2010 .
[37] Jin-Hyuk Kim,et al. Design Optimization of Circumferential Casing Grooves for a Transonic Axial Compressor to Enhance Stall Margin , 2010 .
[38] Shahrokh Shahpar,et al. High Fidelity Multi-stage Design Optimisation of Multi-stage Turbine blades using a Mid-range Approximate Method (MAM) , 2010 .
[39] Bruce A. Conway,et al. Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to Space Trajectories , 2010 .
[40] Meng-Sing Liou,et al. Progress in design optimization using evolutionary algorithms for aerodynamic problems , 2010 .
[41] M. Rumpfkeil,et al. Design Optimization Utilizing Gradient/Hessian Enhanced Surrogate Model , 2010 .
[42] Peng Wu,et al. Research on the optimal combination of ACO parameters based on PSO , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Networking and Digital Society.
[43] Li He,et al. Adjoint Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Blades in Multistage Turbomachines—Part II: Validation and Application , 2010 .
[44] D. X. Wang,et al. Adjoint Aerodynamic Design Optimization for Blades in Multistage Turbomachines—Part I: Methodology and Verification , 2010 .
[45] Jin-Hyuk Kim,et al. Surrogate Modeling for Optimization of a Centrifugal Compressor Impeller , 2010 .
[46] Xiaojun Wu,et al. An Improved GAPSO Hybrid Programming Algorithm , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Information Engineering and Computer Science.
[47] Ronald Scott Bunker,et al. The Effects of Manufacturing Tolerances on Gas Turbine Cooling , 2009 .
[48] Akira Oyama,et al. Data Mining of Pareto-Optimal Transonic Airfoil Shapes Using Proper Orthogonal Decomposition , 2009 .
[49] Zhonghua Han,et al. Efficient Uncertainty Quantification using Gradient-Enhanced Kriging , 2009 .
[50] Mehrdad Zangeneh,et al. On the Coupling of Inverse Design and Optimization Techniques for the Multiobjective, Multipoint Design of Turbomachinery Blades , 2009 .
[51] Katherine Maschmeyer,et al. Improving Genetic Algorithm Efficiency with an Artificial Neural Network for Optimization of Low Reynolds Number Airfoils , 2009 .
[52] Kyung K. Choi,et al. Reliability-Based Design Optimization Using Response Surface Method With Prediction Interval Estimation , 2008 .
[53] Manas Khurana,et al. Application of swarm approach and aritficial neural networks for airfoil shape optimization , 2008 .
[54] Abdus Samad,et al. Shape optimization of an axial compressor blade by multi-objective genetic algorithm , 2008 .
[55] Wahid Ghaly,et al. Aerodynamic optimization of turbomachinery blades using evolutionary methods and ANN-based surrogate models , 2008 .
[56] Kwang-Yong Kim,et al. Multiple surrogate modeling for axial compressor blade shape optimization , 2008 .
[57] G. Gary Wang,et al. Review of Metamodeling Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization , 2007, DAC 2006.
[58] R. Haftka,et al. Ensemble of surrogates , 2007 .
[59] Meng-Sing Liou,et al. Aerostructural Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor , 2006 .
[60] Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al. Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field , 2006, IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag..
[61] Z.-H. Wang,et al. Aerodynamic optimization design of centrifugal compressor's impeller with Kriging model , 2006 .
[62] Shigeru Obayashi,et al. Data mining for multidisciplinary design space of regional-jet wing , 2005, 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.
[63] Choon-Man Jang,et al. Optimization of a stator blade using response surface method in a single-stage transonic axial compressor , 2005 .
[64] K. Choi,et al. Efficient Response Surface Modeling by Using Moving Least-Squares Method and Sensitivity , 2005 .
[65] Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al. Discrete Adjoint Approach for Modeling Unsteady Aerodynamic Design Sensitivities , 2005 .
[66] Nam-Ho Kim,et al. Reliability-Based Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor , 2005 .
[67] Salvador Pintos,et al. An Optimization Methodology of Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Flooding Processes Using Field Scale Numerical Simulation and Multiple Surrogates , 2005 .
[68] Shigeru Obayashi,et al. Data Mining for Aerodynamic Design Space , 2005, J. Aerosp. Comput. Inf. Commun..
[69] Meng-Sing Liou,et al. Multiobjective Optimization Using Coupled Response Surface Model and Evolutionary Algorithm. , 2005 .
[70] P. Rentrop,et al. An adjoint approach to optimal design of turbine blades , 2005 .
[71] Joshua D. Knowles,et al. Multiobjective Optimization on a Budget of 250 Evaluations , 2005, EMO.
[72] Her Mann Tsai,et al. Aerodynamic Design of Turbine Blades Using an Adjoint Equation Method , 2005 .
[73] Kevin Tucker,et al. Response surface approximation of pareto optimal front in multi-objective optimization , 2004 .
[74] Meng-Sing Liou,et al. Transonic Axial-Flow Blade Optimization: Evolutionary Algorithms/Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Solver , 2004 .
[75] Xiaodong Li,et al. Adaptively Choosing Neighbourhood Bests Using Species in a Particle Swarm Optimizer for Multimodal Function Optimization , 2004, GECCO.
[76] Vincent Herbert,et al. Hybrid method for aerodynamic shape optimization in automotive industry , 2004 .
[77] Saman K. Halgamuge,et al. Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.
[78] Xiao-Feng Xie,et al. DEPSO: hybrid particle swarm with differential evolution operator , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).
[79] Ernesto Benini,et al. Three-Dimensional Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor , 2003 .
[80] G. G. Wang,et al. Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points , 2003 .
[81] Magali R. G. Meireles,et al. A comprehensive review for industrial applicability of artificial neural networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..
[82] Marco Laumanns,et al. PISA: A Platform and Programming Language Independent Interface for Search Algorithms , 2003, EMO.
[83] Petros Koumoutsakos,et al. Self-Adaptation for Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms , 2003, EMO.
[84] A. Keane,et al. Evolutionary Optimization of Computationally Expensive Problems via Surrogate Modeling , 2003 .
[85] Feng Liu,et al. Optimum Aerodynamic Design of Cascades by Using an Adjoint Equation Method , 2003 .
[86] Peter J. Bentley,et al. Don't push me! Collision-avoiding swarms , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).
[87] J. Kennedy,et al. Population structure and particle swarm performance , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).
[88] Wei Shyy,et al. Shape optimization of supersonic turbines using global approximation methods , 2002 .
[89] P. Fourie,et al. The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization , 2002 .
[90] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..
[91] Ka Fai Cedric Yiu,et al. Application of simulated annealing to inverse design of transonic turbomachinery cascades , 2002 .
[92] J. Kennedy,et al. The Particle Swarm : Explosion , Stability , and Convergence in a Multi-Dimensional Complex Space , 2003 .
[93] Jun Li,et al. Optimization design of a compressor cascade airfoil using a Navier-Stokes solver and genetic algorithms , 2002 .
[94] T. Simpson,et al. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria , 2001 .
[95] B. Dennis,et al. Optimization of Turbomachinery Airfoils with a Genetic/ Sequential-Quadratic-Programming Algorithm , 2001 .
[96] Timothy W. Simpson,et al. Metamodels for Computer-based Engineering Design: Survey and recommendations , 2001, Engineering with Computers.
[97] Mehmet Serif Kavsaoglu,et al. Aerodynamic Optimization of Turbomachinery Cascades Using Euler/Boundary-Layer Coupled Genetic Algorithms , 2001 .
[98] Ernesto Benini,et al. Design Optimization of Vaned Diffusers for Centrifugal Compressors Using Genetic Algorithms , 2001 .
[99] Meng-Sing Liou,et al. Multiobjective optimization of rocket engine pumps using evolutionary algorithm , 2001 .
[100] Kosuke Ashihara,et al. Turbomachinery Blade Design Using 3-D Inverse Design Method, CFD and Optimization Algorithm , 2001 .
[101] Yuhui Shi,et al. Particle swarm optimization: developments, applications and resources , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No.01TH8546).
[102] Niles A. Pierce,et al. An Introduction to the Adjoint Approach to Design , 2000 .
[103] George S. Dulikravich,et al. Multi-Objective Optimization of Turbomachinery Cascades for Minimum Loss, Maximum Loading, and Maximum Gap-to-Chord Ratio , 2000 .
[104] R. Eberhart,et al. Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).
[105] C. Poloni,et al. Hybridization of a multi-objective genetic algorithm, a neural network and a classical optimizer for a complex design problem in fluid dynamics , 2000 .
[106] Toby J. Mitchell,et al. An algorithm for the construction of “ D -optimal” experimental designs , 2000 .
[107] Richard J. Beckman,et al. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.
[108] K. Hall,et al. Sensitivity Analysis of Unsteady Inviscid Flow Through Turbomachinery Cascades , 2000 .
[109] Michael B. Giles,et al. Improved- lift and drag estimates using adjoint Euler equations , 1999 .
[110] Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al. An updated survey of evolutionary multiobjective optimization techniques: state of the art and future trends , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).
[111] Johan A. K. Suykens,et al. Least Squares Support Vector Machine Classifiers , 1999, Neural Processing Letters.
[112] Thomas J. Santner,et al. Design and analysis of computer experiments , 1998 .
[113] Stephane Pierret,et al. Turbomachinery Blade Design Using a Navier-Stokes Solver and Artificial Neural Network , 1998 .
[114] Russell C. Eberhart,et al. Parameter Selection in Particle Swarm Optimization , 1998, Evolutionary Programming.
[115] Virginia Torczon,et al. Numerical Optimization Using Computer Experiments , 1997 .
[116] T Watson Layne,et al. Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Supersonic Transport Using Design of Experiments Theory and Response Surface Modeling , 1997 .
[117] R. Haftka,et al. Response Surface Techniques for Diffuser Shape Optimization , 1997 .
[118] Anthony G. Sheard,et al. Automatic Genetic Optimization Approach to 2D Blade Profile Design for Steam Turbines , 1997 .
[119] Feng Zhenping,et al. Aerodynamic Optimum Design of Transonic Turbine Cascades Using Genetic Algorithms , 1997 .
[120] Norman R. Draper,et al. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1997 .
[121] Alexander J. Smola,et al. Support Vector Regression Machines , 1996, NIPS.
[122] Douglas O. Stanley,et al. Approximation model building and multidisciplinary design optimization using response surface methods , 1996 .
[123] Russell C. Eberhart,et al. A new optimizer using particle swarm theory , 1995, MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science.
[124] Peter J. Fleming,et al. An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.
[125] Kalyanmoy Deb,et al. Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Evolutionary Computation.
[126] David E. Goldberg,et al. A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization , 1994, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.
[127] Jeong‐Soo Park. Optimal Latin-hypercube designs for computer experiments , 1994 .
[128] David E. Goldberg,et al. Genetic and evolutionary algorithms come of age , 1994, CACM.
[129] Boxin Tang. Orthogonal Array-Based Latin Hypercubes , 1993 .
[130] Peter J. Fleming,et al. Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: FormulationDiscussion and Generalization , 1993, ICGA.
[131] M. L. Shelton,et al. OPTIMIZATION OF A TRANSONIC TURBINE AIRFOIL USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,CFD AND CASCADE TESTING , 1993 .
[132] William C. Carpenter,et al. Effect of design selection on response surface performance , 1993 .
[133] D. Dennis,et al. A statistical method for global optimization , 1992, [Proceedings] 1992 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[134] T. J. Mitchell,et al. Bayesian Prediction of Deterministic Functions, with Applications to the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments , 1991 .
[135] O. Baysal,et al. Aerodynamic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for the Compressible Euler Equations , 1991 .
[136] M. Zangeneh,et al. A compressible three‐dimensional design method for radial and mixed flow turbomachinery blades , 1991 .
[137] Antony Jameson,et al. Aerodynamic design via control theory , 1988, J. Sci. Comput..
[138] W. Cleveland. The elements of graphing data , 1985 .
[139] C. D. Gelatt,et al. Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.
[140] Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al. An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department , 1972 .
[141] Paul G. Tucker,et al. Advances of turbomachinery design optimization , 2015 .
[142] H. Bijl,et al. IMPROVEMENTS TO GRADIENT-ENHANCED KRIGING USING A BAYESIAN INTERPRETATION , 2014 .
[143] N. Aretakis,et al. Fault Diagnosis of Thermal Turbomachines using Support Vector Machines (SVM) , 2013 .
[144] Li He,et al. Concurrent Blade Aerodynamic-Aero-elastic Design Optimization Using Adjoint Method , 2011 .
[145] Marcel Aulich,et al. High-dimensional constrained multiobjective optimization of a fan stage , 2011 .
[146] Long-Sheng Chen,et al. Using SVM based method for equipment fault detection in a thermal power plant , 2011, Comput. Ind..
[147] Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al. A Review of Techniques for Handling Expensive Functions in Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization , 2010 .
[148] Shigeru Obayashi,et al. Performance Map Construction for a Centrifugal Diffuser with Data Mining Techniques , 2010 .
[149] 杉村 和之,et al. Design optimization and knowledge mining for turbomachinery , 2009 .
[150] Jin-Hyuk Kim,et al. Design Optimization of a Centrifugal Compressor Impeller Using Radial Basis Neural Network Method , 2009 .
[151] Christian Frey,et al. The Discrete Adjoint of a Turbomachinery RANS Solver , 2009 .
[152] Wahid Ghaly,et al. A Strategy for Multi-Point Shape Optimization of Turbine Stages in Three-Dimensional Flow , 2009 .
[153] Naixing Chen,et al. Application of Simple Gradient-Based Method and Multi-Section Blade Parameterization Technique to Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a 3D Transonic Single Rotor Compressor , 2009 .
[154] Ivan McBean,et al. THREE-DIMENSIONAL AERODYNAMIC DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF A TURBINE BLADE BY USING AN ADJOINT METHOD , 2009 .
[155] J. Peter,et al. Comparison of surrogate models for turbomachinery design , 2008 .
[156] Carlo Cravero,et al. A NURBS-Based Optimization Tool for Axial Compressor Cascades at Design and Off-Design Conditions , 2008 .
[157] Franz Joos,et al. Optimization of a Centrifugal Impeller Using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2008 .
[158] Akira Oyama,et al. Comparative Study of Data Mining Methods for Aerodynamic Multiobjective Optimizations , 2008 .
[159] Tomohiro Yoshikawa,et al. Visualization Method of Pareto Solutions Reflecting Users' Subjectivity in Multi-Objective Optimization Problems , 2007, PDPTA.
[160] Kaveh Ghorbanian,et al. Axial Compressor Performance Map Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network , 2007 .
[161] André Huppertz,et al. Knowledge Based 2D Blade Design Using Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization and a Neural Network , 2007 .
[162] K. Giannakoglou,et al. COMPRESSOR BLADE OPTIMIZATION USING A CONTINUOUS ADJOINT FORMULATION , 2006 .
[163] Weilin Yi,et al. Design Optimization of Transonic Compressor Rotor Using CFD and Genetic Algorithm , 2006 .
[164] Eberhard Nicke,et al. Automated Multiobjective Optimisation in Axial Compressor Blade Design , 2006 .
[165] Rahul Rai,et al. Qualitative and Quantitative Sequential Sampling , 2006, DAC 2006.
[166] Hongwu Zhang,et al. An Effective Turbine Blade Parameterization and Aerodynamic Optimization Procedure Using an Improved Response Surface Method , 2006 .
[167] Zhenping Feng,et al. Inverse Problem in Aerodynamic Shape Design of Turbomachinery Blades , 2006 .
[168] Qiu Zu-lian,et al. Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on the Idea of Simulated Annealing , 2006 .
[169] Fredrik Wallin,et al. Response Surface-Based Transition Duct Shape Optimization , 2006 .
[170] Yuan Xin,et al. Aerodynamic 3-Dimensional Optimal Design by NURBS of a Certain Stage Turbine Blades , 2006 .
[171] Cristina H. Amon,et al. On Adaptive Sampling for Single and Multi-Response Bayesian Surrogate Models , 2006, DAC 2006.
[172] Raphael T. Haftka,et al. Surrogate-based Analysis and Optimization , 2005 .
[173] Charles Hirsch,et al. Design and Optimization of an Industrial Pump: Application of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Network , 2005 .
[174] Charles Hirsch,et al. Application of Multipoint Optimization to the Design of Turbomachinery Blades , 2004 .
[175] Changduk Kong,et al. Component Map Generation of a Gas Turbine Using Genetic Algorithms , 2004 .
[176] Andrea Arnone,et al. Parametric Optimization of a High-Lift Turbine Vane , 2004 .
[177] Toshiyuki Arima,et al. Advanced High Turning Compressor Airfoils for Low Reynolds Number Condition: Part 2 — Experimental and Numerical Analysis , 2003 .
[178] Bernhard Sendhoff,et al. Advanced High Turning Compressor Airfoils for Low Reynolds Number Condition: Part 1 — Design and Optimization , 2003 .
[179] Gianfranco Guidati,et al. Automated Design Optimization of Compressor Blades for Stationary, Large-Scale Turbomachinery , 2003 .
[180] Michael Meyer,et al. Design of Industrial Axial Compressor Blade Sections for Optimal Range and Performance , 2003 .
[181] Kyriakos C. Giannakoglou,et al. Design of optimal aerodynamic shapes using stochastic optimization methods and computational intelligence , 2002 .
[182] Farrokh Mistree,et al. Kriging Models for Global Approximation in Simulation-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization , 2001 .
[183] Nateri K. Madavan,et al. AERODYNAMIC DESIGN USING NEURAL NETWORKS , 2000 .
[184] Anthony G. Sheard,et al. Automatic Genetic Optimization Approach to Two-Dimensional Blade Profile Design for Steam Turbines , 1999 .
[185] Roger A. Lepsch,et al. Response Surface Model Building and Multidisciplinary Optimization Using D-Optimal Designs , 1998 .
[186] Art B. Owen,et al. 9 Computer experiments , 1996, Design and analysis of experiments.
[187] Genichi Taguchi,et al. Taguchi methods : design of experiments , 1993 .
[188] Oktay Baysal,et al. Aerodynamic design optimization using sensitivity analysis and computational fluid dynamics , 1991 .
[189] Rob A. Rutenbar,et al. Simulated annealing algorithms: an overview , 1989, IEEE Circuits and Devices Magazine.
[190] K. Dejong,et al. An analysis of the behavior of a class of genetic adaptive systems , 1975 .