Time of cochlear implant surgery in academic settings

Objective: Establish the time required to perform cochlear implantation (CI) in academic settings. Study Design: Historical cohort study. Setting: German and American academic centers. Patients: A total of 2639 patients underwent CI (1997-2007). We excluded patients receiving an experimental device or technique and those with abnormal cochlear anatomy or incomplete charts, leaving 2253 for analysis. Intervention: Unilateral, bilateral, and revision CI with devices approved in the U.S. and Europe. Main Outcome Measures: Mean surgical time (ST) and total operating room time (TORT). Results: Mixed model analysis was used; estimated marginal means were calculated in minutes after adjusting for random effect of individual surgeon. There were no differences between unilateral (ST = 171, TORT = 245) and revision CI (ST = 160, TORT = 232), but bilateral procedures were longer (ST = 295, TORT = 377, P < 0.001). In unilateral surgeries, Cochlear Limited (CL) devices were implanted faster (ST = 165, TORT = 225) than Advanced Bionics (ABC) (ST = 183, P = 0.001; TORT = 240, P = 0.023) or MedEl (ST = 193, P < 0.001; TORT = 253, P = 0.002) devices. There were no differences for unilateral CI between ABC and MedEl devices. For revision CI, ABC devices (ST = 141, TORT = 219) were implanted faster than CL devices (ST = 181, P = 0.001; TORT = 266, P < 0.001). There were no differences by age group or between Germany and the U.S. ST and TORT were shorter for 575 CIs performed in the final two years of the study (unilateral CI: ST = 145, TORT = 209; bilateral CI: ST = 259, TORT = 330; revision CI: ST = 138, TORT = 205). For unilateral CI, ST and TORT decreased yearly (linear regression, P < 0.001) and inversely correlated with surgeon experience (linear regression, P < 0.01). Conclusions: We report the time required to perform CI in academic settings—data that are vital for cost-benefit analyses and assessing new CI techniques.

[1]  G. Hughes,et al.  The learning curve in stapes surgery , 1991, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  H R Rubin,et al.  Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. , 2000, JAMA.

[3]  T. Gan,et al.  Risk Factors for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  T. Nikolopoulos,et al.  Minimal Access Surgery for Pediatric Cochlear Implantation , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[5]  J. Oates,et al.  The learning curve in stapes surgery and its implication for training. , 2007, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[6]  Omid Majdani,et al.  Clinical Validation of Percutaneous Cochlear Implant Surgery: Initial Report , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  Jan Gosepath,et al.  Technical Note: Minimal Access Surgery for Cochlear Implantation with MED-EL Devices , 2006, ORL.

[8]  Tal Dagan,et al.  The Suprameatal Approach: An Alternative Surgical Approach to Cochlear Implantation , 2004, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[9]  W. Arnold,et al.  Veria Operation , 2002, ORL.

[10]  Elias D Stratigouleas,et al.  Complication rate of minimally invasive cochlear implantation , 2005, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[11]  J. Kronenberg,et al.  The Suprameatal Approach in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Our Experience with 80 Patients , 2002, ORL.

[12]  M. Carfrae,et al.  Minimal Access Surgery for the Symphonix/Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge Middle Ear Hearing Implant , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[13]  C. Normand,et al.  A Cost‐Utility Analysis of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation , 2000, The Laryngoscope.

[14]  S. Vowler,et al.  The Learning Curve in Stapes Surgery and Its Implication to Training , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[15]  R. Labadie,et al.  Cochlear Implant Performance in Senior Citizens , 2000, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[16]  T. Lenarz,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: German Experience , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.