An Integrated Framework for Conducting and Assessing Interpretive Information Systems ( IS ) Research

Though the number of interpretive research in information systems (IS) has increased substantially in recent years, the development and proliferation of methodology guiding such research is relatively minimal. The IS research methodology in interpretive research is still not institutionalized. This lack of common standards poses problems both for IS researchers using the interpretive paradigm and readers of such research articles. Drawing from the two major methodological developments in the area: seven principles for conducting interpretive IS field studies (Klein and Myers, 1999) and the three criteria for assessing ethnographic research (Golden-Biddle and Locke, 1993), we examine the linkage between the two methodological lenses and propose an integrated framework for conducting and assessing interpretive IS research.

[1]  A. Giddens.  NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[2]  Peter G. W. Keen,et al.  Mis Research: Reference disciplines and a Cumulative Tradition , 1980, ICIS.

[3]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[4]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[5]  W. Gibb Dyer,et al.  Better Stories, Not Better Constructs, To Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt , 1991 .

[6]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic “Remedies” for Trust/Distrust , 1993 .

[8]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[9]  A. Greif.  Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[11]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Finding a happy medium: explaining the negative effects of electronic communication on social life at work , 1994, TOIS.

[12]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Sequential patterns in information systems development: an application of a social process model , 1996, TOIS.

[13]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[14]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[15]  Venkataraman Ramesh,et al.  Research in Information Systems: An Empirical Study of Diversity in the Discipline and Its Journals , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Ruey-Lin Hsiao,et al.  Technology fears: distrust and cultural persistence in electronic marketplace adoption , 2003, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..