Adaptive designs for noninferiority trials.

A method of testing for noninferiority followed by testing for superiority in an adaptive group sequential design is presented. The method permits a data-dependent increase in sample size without any inflation of type-1 error. Closed-form expressions for computing conditional power and the sample size required to achieve any desired conditional power are derived. A new statistical method for performing inference on the primary efficacy parameter is derived. The method is used to obtain the p-value, median-unbiased point estimate and confidence interval for the efficacy parameter. For normal endpoints with known variance, the coverage of the confidence interval is exact. In other settings, the coverage is exact for large samples. An illustrative example is provided in which the methods of testing and estimation are applied to an actual clinical trial of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection. The operating characteristics of the trial are obtained by simulation and demonstrate that the type-1 error is preserved, the point estimate is median unbiased, and the confidence interval provides exact coverage up to Monte Carlo accuracy.

[1]  H. Schäfer,et al.  Adaptive Group Sequential Designs for Clinical Trials: Combining the Advantages of Adaptive and of Classical Group Sequential Approaches , 2001, Biometrics.

[2]  J. Ware,et al.  Sample Size Re-Estimation for Adaptive Sequential Design in Clinical Trials , 2008, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[3]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Modification of Sample Size in Group Sequential Clinical Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[4]  Tze Leung Lai,et al.  Modified Haybittle–Peto group sequential designs for testing superiority and non‐inferiority hypotheses in clinical trials , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  S. Pocock When (not) to stop a clinical trial for benefit. , 2005, JAMA.

[6]  Anastasios A. Tsiatis,et al.  Flexible Sample Size Considerations Using Information-Based Interim Monitoring , 2001 .

[7]  Y Tsong,et al.  Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non‐inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  P. Armitage,et al.  Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating Data , 1969 .

[9]  K. K. Lan,et al.  Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials , 1983 .

[10]  Cyrus R Mehta,et al.  Adaptive increase in sample size when interim results are promising: A practical guide with examples , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Report of the Editors – 2007 , 2008 .

[12]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Interim analyses: the repeated confidence interval approach , 1989 .

[13]  A A Tsiatis,et al.  Exact confidence intervals following a group sequential test. , 1984, Biometrics.