Time variation in mutual fund style exposures

Despite the wide acceptance of return-based style analysis, the method has several limitations. One important drawback is the assumption that style exposures are time-invariant. We apply results on break tests developed in Bai and Perron (1998, 2003) to test for style breaks. We find strong evidence against the hypothesis of constant time exposures in daily return data for European equity funds. All funds exhibit at least one break, and 60% exhibit more than one break. We show that the main reason for style breaks is the mutual funds' reliance on conditional investment strategies based on public information and volatility estimates. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Jeffery V. Bailey.  Are Manager Unvierses Acceptable Performance Benchmarks? , 1992 .

[2]  Jeffrey A. Busse.  Volatility Timing in Mutual Funds: Evidence from Daily Returns , 1999 .

[3]  Wilbur G. Lewellen,et al.  Market Timing and Mutual Fund Investment Performance , 1984 .

[4]  William N. Goetzmann,et al.  Mutual Fund Styles , 1996 .

[5]  Russ Wermers,et al.  Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses , 2000 .

[6]  D. Runkle,et al.  The Inconsistency of Return–Based Style Analysis , 2000 .

[7]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  On Mutual Fund Investment Styles , 1999 .

[8]  Marcin T. Kacperczyk,et al.  On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds , 2004 .

[9]  T. Nijman,et al.  Evaluating Style Analysis , 2000 .

[10]  W. Sharpe.  Asset allocation , 1992 .

[11]  Wayne E. Ferson,et al.  Performance Evaluation Using Conditional Alphas and Betas , 1999 .

[12]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Why are Mutual Fund Flow and Market Returns Related? Evidence from High-Frequency Data , 1999 .

[13]  John G. Gallo,et al.  Benefits of Proper Style Classification of Equity Portfolio Managers , 1997 .

[14]  R. Otten,et al.  European Mutual Fund Performance , 2000 .

[15]  Mark M. Carhart.  On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance , 1997 .

[16]  Angelo Lobosco,et al.  Approximating the Confidence Intervals for Sharpe Style Weights , 1997 .

[17]  diBartolomeoDan,et al.  Mutual Fund Misclassification: Evidence Based on Style Analysis , 1997 .

[18]  Jeffery V. Bailey.  Evaluating Benchmark Quality , 1992 .

[19]  Stanley J. Kon.  The Market-Timing Performance of Mutual Fund Managers , 1983 .

[20]  Moon K. Kim,et al.  Mutual fund objective misclassification , 2000 .

[21]  Relative benchmark rating and persistence analysis: Evidence from Italian equity funds , 2005 .

[22]  Roy. Henriksson,et al.  Market Timing and Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Investigation , 1984 .

[23]  Wayne E. Ferson,et al.  Measuring Fund Strategy and Performance in Changing Economic Conditions , 1996 .

[24]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Why Focus? A Study Of Intra-Industry Focus Effects: INTRA-INDUSTRY FOCUS EFFECTS , 2003 .

[25]  K. Brown,et al.  Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry , 1996 .

[26]  R. Otten,et al.  A comparison between the European and the US mutual fund industry , 1999 .

[27]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[28]  Y. Mundlak.  On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data , 1978 .

[29]  Donald B. Keim.  SIZE-RELATED ANOMALIES AND STOCK RETURN SEASONALITY Further Empirical Evidence , 1983 .

[30]  A. Bose,et al.  Exploiting International Stock Market Correlations with Open-end International Mutual Funds , 1998 .

[31]  H. White,et al.  NONLINEAR REGRESSION ON CROSS-SECTION DATA , 1980 .

[32]  W. Fung,et al.  Empirical Characteristics of Dynamic Trading Strategies: The Case of Hedge Funds , 1997 .

[33]  R. Engle.  Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation , 1982 .

[34]  Jeffrey A. Busse.  Another Look at Mutual Fund Tournaments , 1998, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[35]  Jeffrey A. Busse,et al.  On the Timing Ability of Mutual Fund Managers , 2001 .

[36]  Marc R. Reinganum.  The anomalous stock market behavior of small firms in January: Empirical tests for tax-loss selling effects , 1983 .

[37]  T. Schneeweis,et al.  Multifactor Analysis of Hedge Fund, Managed Futures, and Mutual Fund Return and Risk Characteristics , 1998 .

[38]  Albert Corhay,et al.  STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF DAILY RETURNS: EVIDENCE FROM EUROPEAN STOCK MARKETS , 1994 .

[39]  E. Fama,et al.  BUSINESS CONDITIONS AND EXPECTED RETURNS ON STOCKS AND BONDS , 1989 .

[40]  F. Sortino,et al.  Short-Term Risk-Adjusted Performance , 1997 .

[41]  P. Perron,et al.  Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes , 1995 .

[42]  Andreas Walter,et al.  Herding in the German Mutual Fund Industry , 2006 .

[43]  F. Wilcoxon.  Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[44]  Gregory Kadlec,et al.  On the Perils of Financial Intermediaries Setting Security Prices: The Mutual Fund Wild Card Option , 2001 .

[45]  Nicolaj Siggelkow,et al.  Why Focus? A Study of Intra-Industry Focus Effects , 1998 .

[46]  Donald W. K. Andrews,et al.  Optimal changepoint tests for normal linear regression , 1996 .

[47]  P. Krishnaiah,et al.  19 Review about estimation of change points , 1988 .

[48]  William N. Goetzmann,et al.  Index Funds and Stock Market Growth , 1999 .

[49]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks , 1997 .

[50]  Don M. Chance,et al.  The performance of professional market timers: daily evidence from executed strategies , 2001 .

[51]  Rudi Vander Vennet,et al.  Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance : A Bayesian Stochastic Frontier Approach 1 , 2001 .

[52]  P. Perron,et al.  Computation and Analysis of Multiple Structural-Change Models , 1998 .