Characterizing genetic variants for clinical action

Genome‐wide association studies, DNA sequencing studies, and other genomic studies are finding an increasing number of genetic variants associated with clinical phenotypes that may be useful in developing diagnostic, preventive, and treatment strategies for individual patients. However, few variants have been integrated into routine clinical practice. The reasons for this are several, but two of the most significant are limited evidence about the clinical implications of the variants and a lack of a comprehensive knowledge base that captures genetic variants, their phenotypic associations, and other pertinent phenotypic information that is openly accessible to clinical groups attempting to interpret sequencing data. As the field of medicine begins to incorporate genome‐scale analysis into clinical care, approaches need to be developed for collecting and characterizing data on the clinical implications of variants, developing consensus on their actionability, and making this information available for clinical use. The National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) and the Wellcome Trust thus convened a workshop to consider the processes and resources needed to: (1) identify clinically valid genetic variants; (2) decide whether they are actionable and what the action should be; and (3) provide this information for clinical use. This commentary outlines the key discussion points and recommendations from the workshop. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Richard R Sharp,et al.  Evaluating the utility of personal genomic information , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[2]  Diederick E. Grobbee,et al.  Clinical Epidemiology: Principles, Methods, and Applications for Clinical Research , 2008 .

[3]  M. Olivier A haplotype map of the human genome , 2003, Nature.

[4]  Results of a survey of an online physician community regarding use of electronic medical records in office practices. , 2009, The Journal of medical practice management : MPM.

[5]  Howard L McLeod,et al.  Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Early Promise, But Concerted Effort Needed , 2013, Science.

[6]  A. Marian Molecular genetic studies of complex phenotypes. , 2012, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[7]  D. Altshuler,et al.  A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing , 2010, Nature.

[8]  M. Khoury,et al.  Evaluation of the validity and utility of genetic testing for rare diseases. , 2010, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[9]  Heidi L. Rehm,et al.  Communicating new knowledge on previously reported genetic variants , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[10]  M. Khoury,et al.  Beyond base pairs to bedside: a population perspective on how genomics can improve health. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[11]  R. Verbrugge,et al.  Warfarin genotyping reduces hospitalization rates results from the MM-WES (Medco-Mayo Warfarin Effectiveness study). , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  M. Olivier A haplotype map of the human genome. , 2003, Nature.

[13]  Sharon R Grossman,et al.  Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations , 2010, Nature.

[14]  Dan M. Roden,et al.  Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[15]  M. Guyer,et al.  Charting a course for genomic medicine from base pairs to bedside , 2011, Nature.

[16]  Marylyn D. Ritchie,et al.  Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[17]  R. Quatrano Genomics , 1998, Plant Cell.

[18]  F. Collins,et al.  Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  T. Klein,et al.  CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium of the Pharmacogenomics Research Network , 2011, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[20]  S. Teutsch,et al.  The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group , 2009, Genetics in Medicine.

[21]  M. Christman,et al.  Genetic risk estimation in the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[22]  Isaac S. Kohane,et al.  Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data into Electronic Health Records , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[23]  Judy H. Cho,et al.  Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases , 2009, Nature.

[24]  T. Marteau,et al.  Deflating the Genomic Bubble , 2011, Science.

[25]  Muin J Khoury,et al.  Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[26]  R. Green,et al.  Using Alzheimer's disease as a model for genetic risk disclosure: implications for personal genomics , 2011, Clinical genetics.

[27]  B. Bernhardt,et al.  Motivations and Perceptions of Early Adopters of Personalized Genomics: Perspectives from Research Participants , 2011, Public Health Genomics.

[28]  Melissa A. Basford,et al.  The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future , 2013, Genetics in Medicine.

[29]  C. Rotimi,et al.  The A's, G's, C's, and T's of health disparities , 2009, BMC Medical Genomics.

[30]  Justin Starren,et al.  Crossing the omic chasm: a time for omic ancillary systems. , 2013, JAMA.

[31]  Robert C. Green,et al.  Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.