A Bayesian adaptive design for multi-dose, randomized, placebo-controlled phase I/II trials.

We present a design for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) featuring two simultaneous iterative processes, dose escalation and cohort expansion. In this design, patient enrollment does not need to stop when transitioning from the evaluation of the dose safety and tolerability to the assessment of its efficacy. The cohort expansion used in dose-finding is adaptive, based on the interim comparisons between each dose and placebo. A set of Bayesian rules guides the decisions about dose cohort expansion. Operating characteristics of this design have been evaluated by simulations designed to mimic the trial conduct and outcome in a variety of dose toxicity and efficacy scenarios. Simulation studies demonstrated that our proposed adaptive design can reduce the total sample size as compared to the conventional approach. The sample size reduction was more profound in scenarios when the testing doses are not effective. Simulation studies also demonstrated that this proposed adaptive design controls the false positive error rate at the specified level and provides adequate statistical power to detect the treatment effect. Compared to the conventional approach, our proposed adaptive design removes ineffective doses, reduces the total sample size, and maintains adequate power for dose-finding. The proposed design has been implemented in an ongoing study and software for trial simulation is available at http://odin.mdacc.tmc.edu/~yuanj/soft.html.

[1]  Saralees Nadarajah Reliability for some bivariate beta distributions , 2005 .

[2]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.

[3]  Yuan Ji,et al.  Bayesian Continual Reassessment Method for Dose-Finding Trials Infusing T Cells with Limited Sample Size , 2012, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[4]  Peter F. Thall,et al.  Some extensions and applications of a Bayesian strategy for monitoring multiple outcomes in clinical trials. , 1998 .

[5]  Yuan Ji,et al.  Dose-finding in phase I clinical trials based on toxicity probability intervals , 2007, Clinical trials.

[6]  P. Miller,et al.  Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral Density , 2007 .

[7]  Multc Lean Statistical Tutorial , 2013 .

[8]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian Adaptive Methods for Clinical Trials , 2010 .

[9]  Yuan Ji,et al.  Adaptive randomization for multiarm comparative clinical trials based on joint efficacy/toxicity outcomes. , 2009, Biometrics.

[10]  Yuan Ji,et al.  A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials. , 2010, Clinical trials.

[11]  P F Thall,et al.  Practical Bayesian guidelines for phase IIB clinical trials. , 1994, Biometrics.

[12]  Adaptive dose insertion in early phase clinical trials , 2013, Clinical trials.

[13]  Saralees Nadarajah,et al.  Stochastic inequality probabilities for adaptively randomized clinical trials. , 2006, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[14]  Robert E Weiss,et al.  Bayesian methods for data analysis. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  P. Thall,et al.  Bayesian sequential monitoring designs for single-arm clinical trials with multiple outcomes. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[16]  P F Thall,et al.  Some extensions and applications of a Bayesian strategy for monitoring multiple outcomes in clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Elihu H. Estey,et al.  Adaptive Dose Selection Using Efficacy-Toxicity Trade-Offs: Illustrations and Practical Considerations , 2006, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.