Utilisation of supplementary prenatal screening and diagnostics in Germany: cross-sectional study using data from the KUNO Kids Health Study

[1]  M. Melter,et al.  KUNO-Kids birth cohort study: rationale, design, and cohort description , 2019, Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics.

[2]  A. Kolleck,et al.  Aktueller Stand und Entwicklungen der Pränataldiagnostik. Endbericht zum Monitoring , 2019 .

[3]  A. Arora,et al.  Lessons learnt in recruiting disadvantaged families to a birth cohort study , 2018, BMC Nursing.

[4]  Publisher's Note , 2018, Anaesthesia.

[5]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Inequalities in uptake of prenatal screening according to ethnicity and socio‐economic status in the four largest cities of the Netherlands (2011–2013) , 2017, Prenatal diagnosis.

[6]  N. Maass,et al.  Physical Exercise During Pregnancy – How Active Are Pregnant Women in Germany and How Well Informed? Körperliche Aktivität in der Schwangerschaft – wie sportlich sind unsere Schwangeren und wie gut sind sie informiert? , 2017, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[7]  Line Kristensen,et al.  The rate of invasive testing for trisomy 21 is reduced after implementation of NIPT. , 2017, Danish medical journal.

[8]  S. Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi,et al.  Primary health care utilisation and its costs among middle-aged smokers , 2017, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[9]  K. Petersson,et al.  Prenatal diagnosis in Sweden 2011 to 2013—a register-based study , 2016, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[10]  K. Putman,et al.  Antenatal care use in urban areas in two European countries: Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants in Belgium and the Netherlands , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  J. Langhoff‐Roos,et al.  Changing prevalence and the risk factors for antenatal obstetric hospitalizations in Denmark 2003–2012 , 2016, Clinical epidemiology.

[12]  O. von dem Knesebeck,et al.  [Social disparities in outpatient and inpatient care: An overview of current findings in Germany]. , 2016, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz.

[13]  N. Dragano,et al.  [Social inequality and health: Status and prospects of socio-epidemiological research in Germany]. , 2016, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz.

[14]  E. Abalos,et al.  Antenatal care for healthy pregnant women: a mapping of interventions from existing guidelines to inform the development of new WHO guidance on antenatal care , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  P. Schulz,et al.  The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  J. Klein,et al.  Soziale Unterschiede in der ambulanten und stationären Versorgung , 2015, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[17]  C. Mitchell,et al.  Deprivation and poor psychosocial support are key determinants of late antenatal presentation and poor fetal outcomes-a combined retrospective and prospective study , 2015, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[18]  J. Kurinczuk,et al.  Experiences, utilisation and outcomes of maternity care in England among women from different socio‐economic groups: findings from the 2010 National Maternity Survey , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  J. Hoebel,et al.  [Health literacy of adults in Germany: Findings from the German Health Update (GEDA) study]. , 2015, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz.

[20]  S. Jordan,et al.  Gesundheitskompetenz von Erwachsenen in Deutschland , 2015, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[21]  A. Rommel,et al.  Die gesundheitliche Lage von Menschen mit Migrationshintergrund und die Bedeutung des sozioökonomischen Status , 2015, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[22]  Leitthema.  Gesundheitskompetenz von Erwachsenen in Deutschland Ergebnisse der Studie „ Gesundheit in Deutschland aktuell “ ( GEDA ) , 2015 .

[23]  M. Richter,et al.  Soziale Ungleichheit und Gesundheit , 2015, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[24]  W. Henrich,et al.  Comparison of Perinatal Data of Immigrant Women of Turkish Origin and German Women - Results of a Prospective Study in Berlin. , 2014, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[25]  Gerardine Doyle,et al.  Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q) , 2013, BMC Public Health.

[26]  R. Holle,et al.  The association of smoking status with healthcare utilisation, productivity loss and resulting costs: results from the population-based KORA F4 study , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[27]  U. Flick,et al.  Patients’ subjective concepts about primary healthcare utilisation: the study protocol of a qualitative comparative study between Norway and Germany , 2013, BMJ Open.

[28]  W. Devillé,et al.  Factors affecting the use of prenatal care by non-western women in industrialized western countries: a systematic review , 2013, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[29]  K. Putman,et al.  Content and timing of antenatal care: predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of antenatal care trajectories. , 2013, European journal of public health.

[30]  D. Ayres-de-Campos,et al.  Maternal Healthcare in Migrants: A Systematic Review , 2013, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[31]  F. Schellevis,et al.  Determinants of late and/or inadequate use of prenatal healthcare in high-income countries: a systematic review. , 2012, European journal of public health.

[32]  Birgit Babitsch,et al.  Re-revisiting Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use: a systematic review of studies from 1998–2011 , 2012, Psycho-social medicine.

[33]  A. Broom,et al.  Attitudes and referral practices of maternity care professionals with regard to complementary and alternative medicine: an integrative review. , 2011, Journal of advanced nursing.

[34]  K. Putman,et al.  Determinants of the number of antenatal visits in a metropolitan region , 2010, BMC public health.

[35]  A. Hofman,et al.  Explaining Ethnic Differences in Late Antenatal Care Entry by Predisposing, Enabling and Need Factors in the Netherlands. The Generation R Study , 2010, Maternal and Child Health Journal.

[36]  B. Reime,et al.  Does underutilization of prenatal care explain the excess risk for stillbirth among women with migration background in Germany? , 2009, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[37]  J. Wasem,et al.  Vergütungsunterschiede im ambulanten ärztlichen Bereich zwischen PKV und GKV und Modelle der Vergütungsangleichung , 2009 .

[38]  J. Wasem,et al.  Vergütungsunterschiede im ärztlichen Bereich zwischen PKV und GKV auf Basis des standardisierten Leistungsniveaus der GKV und Modelle der Vergütungsangleichung , 2008 .

[39]  R. Andersen,et al.  Improving Access to Care in America: Individual and Contextual Indicators. , 2007 .

[40]  B. Kurth,et al.  [Predictors for ambulatory medical care utilization in Germany]. , 2005, Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz.

[41]  R. Andersen,et al.  Changing the U.S. Health Care System: Key Issues in Health Services Policy and Management , 2001 .

[42]  R. Andersen,et al.  Ethnicity, Aging, and Oral Health Outcomes: A Conceptual Framework , 1997, Advances in dental research.

[43]  G. Krieger.  Gebührenordnung für Ärzte — GOÄ , 1988 .

[44]  R. Andersen,et al.  Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. , 1973, The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society.