This paper explores the role of semantic transparency in the representation and processing of English compounds. We focus on the question of whether semantic transparency is best viewed as a property of the entire multimorphemic string or as a property of constituent morphemes. Accordingly, we investigated the processing of English compound nouns that were categorized in terms of the semantic transparency of each of their constituents. Fully transparent such as bedroom are those in which the meanings of each of the constituents are transparently represented in the meaning of the compound as a whole. These compounds were contrasted with compounds such as strawberry, in which only the second constituent is semantically transparent, jailbird, in which only the first constituent is transparent, and hogwash, in which neither constituent is semantically transparent. We propose that significant insights can be achieved through such analysis of the transparency of individual morphemes. The two experiments that we report present evidence that both semantically transparent compounds and semantically opaque compounds show morphological constituency. The semantic transparency of the morphological head (the second constituent in a morphologically right-headed language such as English) was found to play a significant role in overall lexical decision latencies, in patterns of decomposition, and in the effects of stimulus repetition within the experiment.
[1]
A. Zwicky,et al.
The handbook of morphology
,
2001
.
[2]
M. Taft.
Prefix Stripping Revisited.
,
1981
.
[3]
Gary Libben,et al.
Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing, and Impairment
,
1998,
Brain and Language.
[4]
Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.
Morphological aspects of language processing.
,
1997
.
[5]
Dominiek Sandra,et al.
On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur
,
1990
.
[6]
W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.
Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.
,
1994
.
[7]
Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.
The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds
,
1994
.
[8]
Robert Schreuder,et al.
Modeling morphological processing.
,
1995
.
[9]
Gary Libben,et al.
How is morphological decomposition achieved
,
1994
.
[10]
Gary Libben,et al.
Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study
,
1999,
Brain and Language.
[11]
Anne Cutler,et al.
Morphology in word recognition
,
1998
.