Evaluation of laboratory performance in IMEP water interlaboratory comparisons

The aim of International Evaluation Programme (IMEP) is to present objectively the quality of chemical measurements. Participants in IMEP compare their reported measurement results with independent external certified reference values with demonstrated traceability and uncertainty, as evaluated according to international guidelines. Three major interlaboratory comparisons (ILCs), IMEP-6, IMEP-9 and IMEP-12, on trace elements in water were carried out from 1994 to 2000. Participants' results for Cd, Fe and Pb concentrations from these three different IMEP water ILCs were compared by means of suitable performance indicators. The performance evaluation criteria were set according to the requirements stated in the Council Directive 98/83/EC of 3 November 1998 on the quality of water intended for human consumption. Two different performance indicators were selected for evaluation of the individual participants' results: the commonly used z-score and the not so well-known En number. The group performance indicator is based on the variation of z-scores. To assess the individual measurement performance, not only the deviation of the reported measurement values from the certified reference value, but also criteria for maximum and minimum acceptable uncertainties were taken into account. The participants' performance is also reviewed by means of using a simple graphical tool, called “Naji-plots”.

[1]  S. Standard.  GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .

[2]  P. Taylor,et al.  Announcing the collaboration between the European co-operation for Accreditation and the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements: Improving the metrological basis of the European accreditation system for chemical measurements , 2002 .

[3]  Vic Barnett,et al.  Outliers in Statistical Data , 1980 .

[4]  W. Horwitz,et al.  Evaluation of Analytical Methods Used for Regulation of Foods and Drugs , 1982 .

[5]  Philip D. P. Taylor,et al.  Requirements vs acceptability in proficiency testing schemes and other interlaboratory comparisons , 2001 .

[6]  Jørgen Nørgaard,et al.  The interlaboratory comparison "IMEP-19 trace elements in rice"—a new approach for measurement performance evaluation , 2004 .

[7]  Milan Meloun,et al.  Kompendium statistického zpracování dat : metody a řešené úlohy včetně CD. , 2002 .

[8]  Statistical evaluation of interlaboratory tests , 1988 .

[9]  Leonard Steinborn,et al.  International Organization for Standardization ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories , 2004 .

[10]  Terry Quinn,et al.  The Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière: a brief review of its origin and present activities , 1997 .

[11]  Michael Thompson,et al.  Recent trends in inter-laboratory precision at ppb and sub-ppb concentrations in relation to fitness for purpose criteria in proficiency testing , 2000 .