Assessing the Efficiency of RNA Interference for Maize Functional Genomics1[W][OA]

A large-scale functional genomics project was initiated to study the function of chromatin-related genes in maize (Zea mays). Transgenic lines containing short gene segments in inverted repeat orientation designed to reduce expression of target genes by RNA interference (RNAi) were isolated, propagated, and analyzed in a variety of assays. Analysis of the selectable marker expression over multiple generations revealed that most transgenes were transmitted faithfully, whereas some displayed reduced transmission or transgene silencing. A range of target-gene silencing efficiencies, from nondetectable silencing to nearly complete silencing, was revealed by semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of transcript abundance for the target gene. In some cases, the RNAi construct was able to cause a reduction in the steady-state RNA levels of not only the target gene, but also another closely related gene. Correlation of silencing efficiency with expression level of the target gene and sequence features of the inverted repeat did not reveal any factors capable of predicting the silencing success of a particular RNAi-inducing construct. The frequencies of success of this large-scale project in maize, together with parameters for optimization at various steps, should serve as a useful framework for designing future RNAi-based functional genomics projects in crop plants.

[1]  Broome,et al.  Literature cited , 1924, A Guide to the Carnivores of Central America.

[2]  P. Lemaux,et al.  Nature of stress and transgene locus influences transgene expression stability in barley , 2006, Plant Molecular Biology.

[3]  Nathan M. Springer,et al.  Cis-transcriptional Variation in Maize Inbred Lines B73 and Mo17 Leads to Additive Expression Patterns in the F1 Hybrid , 2006, Genetics.

[4]  B. Keller,et al.  RNA Interference-Based Gene Silencing as an Efficient Tool for Functional Genomics in Hexaploid Bread Wheat1[W][OA] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[5]  V. Chandler,et al.  Transcriptionally Silenced Transgenes in Maize Are Activated by Three Mutations Defective in Paramutation , 2006, Genetics.

[6]  Olivier Voinnet,et al.  The diversity of RNA silencing pathways in plants. , 2006, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[7]  H. Vaucheret.  Post-transcriptional small RNA pathways in plants: mechanisms and regulations. , 2006, Genes & development.

[8]  L. Iyer,et al.  Assessment of penetrance and expressivity of RNAi-mediated silencing of the Arabidopsis phytoene desaturase gene. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[9]  Nathan M. Springer,et al.  Evolutionary Divergence of Monocot and Dicot Methyl-CpG-Binding Domain Proteins1[w] , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[10]  Tuya Wulan,et al.  Transgene-induced RNA interference as a tool for plant functional genomics. , 2005, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  Nathan M. Springer,et al.  Discovery of induced point mutations in maize genes by TILLING , 2004, BMC Plant Biology.

[12]  C. Napoli,et al.  Effectiveness of RNA interference in transgenic plants , 2004, FEBS letters.

[13]  A. Reynolds,et al.  Rational siRNA design for RNA interference , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  Weihua Tang,et al.  OsBP-73, a rice gene, encodes a novel DNA-binding protein with a SAP-like domain and its genetic interference by double-stranded RNA inhibits rice growth , 2003, Plant Molecular Biology.

[15]  J. Bennetzen.  Covalent DNA modification and the regulation of Mutator element transposition in maize , 1987, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[16]  A. Depicker,et al.  Plants as bioreactors for protein production: avoiding the problem of transgene silencing , 2004, Plant Molecular Biology.

[17]  Jeffrey M Good,et al.  Molecular correlates of genes exhibiting RNAi phenotypes in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2003, Genome research.

[18]  L. Stein,et al.  Maize-targeted mutagenesis: A knockout resource for maize , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  J. Messing,et al.  A new opaque variant of maize by a single dominant RNA-interference-inducing transgene. , 2003, Genetics.

[20]  Nathan M. Springer,et al.  Comparative Analysis of SET Domain Proteins in Maize and Arabidopsis Reveals Multiple Duplications Preceding the Divergence of Monocots and Dicots1[w] , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[21]  V. Walbot,et al.  Initiation of silencing of maize MuDR/Mu transposable elements. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[22]  Y. Dong,et al.  Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi , 2003, Nature.

[23]  Peter M. Waterhouse,et al.  Exploring plant genomes by RNA-induced gene silencing , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[24]  D. Mount,et al.  Analysis of Histone Acetyltransferase and Histone Deacetylase Families of Arabidopsis Thaliana Suggests Functional Diversi®cation of Chromatin Modi®cation among Multicellular Eukaryotes , 2002 .

[25]  P. Vain,et al.  Transgene behaviour across two generations in a large random population of transgenic rice plants produced by particle bombardment , 2002, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[26]  T. Brutnell.  Transposon tagging in maize , 2002, Functional & Integrative Genomics.

[27]  P. Hegemann,et al.  The abundant retinal protein of the Chlamydomonas eye is not the photoreceptor for phototaxis and photophobic responses. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[28]  V. Chandler,et al.  B-Bolivia, an allele of the maize b1 gene with variable expression, contains a high copy retrotransposon-related sequence immediately upstream. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[29]  V. Chandler,et al.  mediator of paramutation1 Is Required for Establishment and Maintenance of Paramutation at Multiple Maize Loci , 2000, Plant Cell.

[30]  E. Meyerowitz,et al.  Specific and heritable genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  V. Chandler,et al.  Major recent and independent changes in levels and patterns of expression have occurred at the b gene, a regulatory locus in maize. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  V. Chandler,et al.  The maize regulatory gene B-Peru contains a DNA rearrangement that specifies tissue-specific expression through both positive and negative promoter elements. , 1998, Genetics.

[33]  J. SantaLucia,et al.  A unified view of polymer, dumbbell, and oligonucleotide DNA nearest-neighbor thermodynamics. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  V. Chandler,et al.  Allelic diversity of the maize B regulatory gene: different leader and promoter sequences of two B alleles determine distinct tissue specificities of anthocyanin production. , 1992, Genes & development.

[35]  C. Armstrong,et al.  Development and availability of germplasm with high Type II culture formation response , 1991 .

[36]  V. Chandler,et al.  Two regulatory genes of the maize anthocyanin pathway are homologous: isolation of B utilizing R genomic sequences. , 1989, The Plant cell.

[37]  V. Walbot.  Inheritance of mutator activity in Zea mays as assayed by somatic instability of the bz2-mu1 allele. , 1986, Genetics.

[38]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[39]  O. Ceska,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL DIFFERENCES IN ACTION OF R AND B ALLELES IN MAIZE , 1973 .