Self-determination, social abilities and the quality of life of people with intellectual disability.

BACKGROUND The international literature has documented that self-determination is impacted by environmental factors, including living or work settings; and by intraindividual factors, including intelligence level, age, gender, social skills and adaptive behaviour. In addition, self-determination has been correlated with improved quality of life (QoL). This study sought to contribute to the growing literature base in this area by examining the relationship among and between personal characteristics, self-determination, social abilities and the environmental living situations of people with intellectual disabilities (ID). METHODS The study involved 141 people with ID residing in Italy. Healthcare professionals and social workers who had known participants for at least 1 year completed measures of self-determination, QoL and social skills. Analysis of variance was conducted to verify whether different levels of intellectual impairment were associated with different degrees of the dependent variables. The Pearson product-moment correlation was used to examine any relationships among dependent variables and IQ scores. Finally, discriminant function analysis was used to examine the degree to which IQ score, age, self-determination and social abilities predicted membership in groups that were formed based on living arrangement, and on QoL status (high vs. low). RESULTS The anova determined, as expected, that participants with more severe ID showed the lowest levels of self-determination, QoL and social abilities. Discriminant function analysis showed that (a) individuals attending day centres were distinguished from those living in institutions in that they were younger and showed greater autonomy of choice and self-determination in their daily activities; (b) basic social skills and IQ score predicted membership in the high or low QoL groups; and (c) the IQ score predicted membership in the high or low self-determination groups. A manova conducted to examine gender- and age-level differences on self-determination found gender differences; women had higher self-determination scores than men. CONCLUSIONS These findings contribute to an emerging knowledge base pertaining to the role of intraindividual and environmental factors in self-determination and QoL. In general, the study replicated findings pertaining to the relative contribution of intelligence to self-determination and QoL, added information about the potential contribution of social abilities, and pointed to the potentially important role of opportunities to make choices as a particularly important aspect of becoming more self-determined, at least in the context of residential settings.

[1]  D. Felce,et al.  Correlation between subjective and objective measures of outcome in staffed community housing. , 2005, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[2]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  The Impact of Personal Characteristics of People with Intellectual and Developmental Disability on Self‐determination and Autonomous Functioning , 2003 .

[3]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Personal control and the ecology of community living settings: beyond living-unit size and type. , 2000, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[4]  D. Helm Handbook on Quality of Life for Human Service Practitioners , 2003 .

[5]  J. Chadsey-Rusch Toward defining and measuring social skills in employment settings. , 1992, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[6]  Michael L. Wehmeyer,et al.  The Relationship Between Self-Determination and Quality of Life for Adults with Mental Retardation , 1998 .

[7]  R. Stancliffe,et al.  Longitudinal study of deinstitutionalization and the exercise of choice. , 1997, Mental retardation.

[8]  K. Järbrink,et al.  Quality and costs of supported living residences and group homes in the United Kingdom. , 2001, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[9]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[10]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Self-Determination and Positive Adult Outcomes: A Follow-up Study of Youth with Mental Retardation or Learning Disabilities , 1997 .

[11]  Social ecology of supervised communal facilities for mentally disabled adults: II. Predictors of affiliation. , 1980, American journal of mental deficiency.

[12]  J. Conroy The small ICF/MR program: dimensions of quality and cost. , 1996, Mental retardation.

[13]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Self-determination across living and working environments: a matched-samples study of adults with mental retardation. , 1999, Mental Retardation.

[14]  R. Stancliffe Living with support in the community: predictors of choice and self-determination. , 2001, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[15]  L. Miller,et al.  Validity of self-report of adaptive behavior skills by adults with mental retardation. , 1990, Mental retardation.

[16]  J. Noell,et al.  A Construct Score Approach to the Assessment of Social Competence , 1992 .

[17]  T. Heller,et al.  Eight-year follow-up of the impact of environmental characteristics on well-being of adults with developmental disabilities. , 2002, Mental retardation.

[18]  J. Tøssebro Impact of size revisited: relation of number of residents to self-determination and deprivatization. , 1995, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[19]  D. Felce,et al.  Quality of Life Outcomes for People with Intellectual Disabilities living in staffed community housing services: a stratified random sample of statutory, voluntary and private agency provision , 2003 .

[20]  M. Rapley,et al.  Staff:staff and staff:client reliability of the Schalock & Keith (1993) Quality of Life Questionnaire. , 1998, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[21]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. , 2001, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[22]  R. Stancliffe Proxy respondents and the reliability of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Empowerment factor. , 1999, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[23]  I. Duvdevany,et al.  Self-determination and mental retardation: is there an association with living arrangement and lifestyle satisfaction? , 2002, Mental retardation.

[24]  M. Wehmeyer Individual and environmental factors related to the self-determination of adults with mental retardation , 1995 .

[25]  L. Nota,et al.  A Social Skill Training for Persons with Down's Syndrome , 2000 .

[26]  K. McVilly,et al.  Concurrence between subject and proxy ratings of quality of life for people with and without intellectual disabilities , 2000 .

[27]  R. Cummins Proxy responding for subjective well-being: A review , 2002 .

[28]  R. Schalock,et al.  The relationship between quality of life and self-determination: an international study. , 2005, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[29]  R. Stancliffe Community living-unit size, staff presence, and residents' choice-making. , 1997, Mental retardation.

[30]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Theory in Self-Determination: Foundations for Educational Practice , 2003 .

[31]  L. Nota,et al.  Quality of life in adults with an intellectual disability: the Evaluation of Quality of Life Instrument. , 2006, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[32]  M. Wehmeyer,et al.  Adult Outcomes for Students with Cognitive Disabilities Three-Years After High School: The Impact of Self-Determination , 2003 .

[33]  C. Sigelman,et al.  When in doubt, say yes: acquiescence in interviews with mentally retarded persons. , 1981, Mental retardation.