The CtBP2 co-repressor is regulated by NADH-dependent dimerization and possesses a novel N-terminal repression domain.

The C-terminal binding protein 2 (CtBP2) is a 48 kDa phosphoprotein reported to function as a co- repressor for a growing list of transcriptional repressors. It was recently demonstrated that CtBP is a dimeric NAD+-regulated d-isomer-specific 2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase. However, the specific substrate(s) of CtBP enzymatic activity and the relationship of this activity to its co-repression function remain unknown. The ability of a human CtBP to bind and serve as a co-repressor of E1A has been shown to be regulated by nuclear NADH levels. Here we extend the functional characterization of CtBP by demonstrating that amino acid substitutions at Gly189 in the conserved NAD+-binding fold both abrogate the ability of CtBP2 to homodimerize and are associated with a dramatic loss of co-repressor activity. Consistent with the known enzymatic activity of CtBP2, mutations at Arg272 in the substrate-binding domain and at His321 in the catalytic domain result in significant loss of CtBP2 transcriptional co-repressor activity. High resolution serial C-terminal deletion analysis of CtBP2 also revealed a novel N-terminal repression domain that is distinct from its dehydrogenase domain. Our results suggest a model in which CtBP2 co-repressor function is regulated, at least in part, through the effect of NADH on CtBP2 homodimerization.

[1]  G. Chinnadurai,et al.  Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide stimulates oligomerization, interaction with adenovirus E1A and an intrinsic dehydrogenase activity of CtBP , 2003, FEBS letters.

[2]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  Transcription corepressor CtBP is an NAD(+)-regulated dehydrogenase. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[3]  Qinghong Zhang,et al.  Regulation of Corepressor Function by Nuclear NADH , 2002, Science.

[4]  G. Chinnadurai,et al.  CtBP, an unconventional transcriptional corepressor in development and oncogenesis. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[5]  J. Boeke,et al.  Chemistry of gene silencing: the mechanism of NAD+-dependent deacetylation reactions. , 2001, Biochemistry.

[6]  M. Crossley,et al.  The CtBP family: enigmatic and enzymatic transcriptional co‐repressors , 2001, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[7]  J. Bonventre,et al.  TRIP‐Br: a novel family of PHD zinc finger‐ and bromodomain‐interacting proteins that regulate the transcriptional activity of E2F‐1/DP‐1 , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[8]  Christopher J. Lee,et al.  The GeneMine system for genome/proteome annotation and collaborative data mining , 2001, IBM Syst. J..

[9]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[10]  Q. Zhang,et al.  Acetylation of adenovirus E1A regulates binding of the transcriptional corepressor CtBP. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Delaunay,et al.  H2O2 sensing through oxidation of the Yap1 transcription factor , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[12]  K. Georgopoulos,et al.  Ikaros Interactions with CtBP Reveal a Repression Mechanism That Is Independent of Histone Deacetylase Activity* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  R. Sternglanz,et al.  The silencing protein SIR2 and its homologs are NAD-dependent protein deacetylases. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  L. Guarente,et al.  Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase , 2000, Nature.

[15]  A. Otte,et al.  C-Terminal Binding Protein Is a Transcriptional Repressor That Interacts with a Specific Class of Vertebrate Polycomb Proteins , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[16]  J. Turner,et al.  Cloning and characterization of mCtBP2, a co‐repressor that associates with basic Krüppel‐like factor and other mammalian transcriptional regulators , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[17]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  C. Bellamacina The nicotinamide dinucleotide binding motif: a comparison of nucleotide binding proteins , 1996, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[19]  J. M. Boyd,et al.  Molecular cloning and characterization of a cellular phosphoprotein that interacts with a conserved C-terminal domain of adenovirus E1A involved in negative modulation of oncogenic transformation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Tony Kouzarides,et al.  Stimulation of E2F1/DP1 transcriptional activity by MDM2 oncoprotein , 1995, Nature.

[21]  S. Berger,et al.  Functional similarity and physical association between GCN5 and ADA2: putative transcriptional adaptors. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[22]  H. Toh,et al.  Cloning and expression of the gene for hydroxypyruvate reductase (D-glycerate dehydrogenase from an obligate methylotroph Hyphomicrobium methylovorum GM2. , 1994, European journal of biochemistry.

[23]  T. Ohta,et al.  Histidine 296 is essential for the catalysis in Lactobacillus plantarum D-lactate dehydrogenase. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  J. M. Boyd,et al.  A region in the C‐terminus of adenovirus 2/5 E1a protein is required for association with a cellular phosphoprotein and important for the negative modulation of T24‐ras mediated transformation, tumorigenesis and metastasis. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[25]  T. Curran,et al.  Redox activation of Fos‐Jun DNA binding activity is mediated by a DNA repair enzyme. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[26]  S. Kochhar,et al.  Evolutionary relationship of NAD(+)-dependent D-lactate dehydrogenase: comparison of primary structure of 2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenases. , 1992, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[27]  T. Curran,et al.  Identification and characterization of Ref‐1, a nuclear protein that facilitates AP‐1 DNA‐binding activity. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[28]  M. Arthur,et al.  Structural relationship between the vancomycin resistance protein VanH and 2-hydroxycarboxylic acid dehydrogenases. , 1991, Gene.

[29]  T. Curran,et al.  Redox regulation of fos and jun DNA-binding activity in vitro. , 1990, Science.

[30]  G. Chinnadurai,et al.  Enhanced ras oncogene mediated cell transformation and tumorigenesis by adenovirus 2 mutants lacking the C-terminal region of E1a protein. , 1989, Oncogene.

[31]  M. Ptashne,et al.  GAL4 activates gene expression in mammalian cells , 1988, Cell.

[32]  P. Terpstra,et al.  Prediction of the Occurrence of the ADP-binding βαβ-fold in Proteins, Using an Amino Acid Sequence Fingerprint , 1986 .

[33]  Michael G. Rossmann,et al.  Chemical and biological evolution of a nucleotide-binding protein , 1974, Nature.

[34]  D. J. Schuller,et al.  The allosteric ligand site in the Vmax-type cooperative enzyme phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[35]  R. Wierenga,et al.  INTERACTION OF PYROPHOSPHATE MOIETIES WITH ALPHA-HELIXES IN DINUCLEOTIDE BINDING-PROTEINS , 1985 .