Bring in the Arts and Get the Creativity for Free: A Study of the Artists in Residence Project

In the literature on creativity and innovation, there is a tendency to idolize great contributors to the liberal arts as extraordinarily creative individuals. Such ex post facto accounts of ‘great men and women’ are, however, of limited value for everyday practices in organizations. This paper reports insights from a Swedish project named Artists in Residence (AIRIS) wherein artists, including musicians, painters, actors and directors, dancers and choreographers, collaborated with a regular company or workplace during a ten-month project, aimed at helping the co-workers think in new and creative ways. The study concludes that there are many benefits from making the world of artists and the world of work intersect, but there is also a demand on the participant to fully commit to the project. Even though the culture project was positively received among co-workers, only a limited effect on workplace climate could be reported for the 2005 evaluation, while the 2006 evaluation indicates more positive effects. Still, the amount of texts advocating artists' creative skills and experiences outnumber the cases of actual projects bringing the two groups together. Studies of projects like AIRIS show that there is a great potential in bringing artists into industry.

[1]  Eleonora Belfiore.  Art as a means of alleviating social exclusion: Does it really work? A critique of instrumental cultural policies and social impact studies in the UK , 2002 .

[2]  Michael J. Wolf,et al.  The Entertainment Economy: How Mega-Media Forces Are Transforming Our Lives , 1999 .

[3]  Michael G. Pratt,et al.  There's No Place like Home? The Contributions of Work and Nonwork Creativity Support to Employees' Creative Performance , 2002 .

[4]  Pierre-Michel Menger.  ARTISTIC LABOR MARKETS AND CAREERS , 1999 .

[5]  Anurag Sharma,et al.  Central Dilemmas of Managing Innovation in Large Firms , 1999 .

[6]  Guy Julier,et al.  The culture of design , 2000 .

[7]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  How to kill creativity. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[8]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  The Field of Cultural Production Essays on Art and Literature , 1993 .

[9]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  WICS: A Model of Leadership in Organizations , 2003 .

[10]  Craig R. Harris.  Art and innovation: the Xerox PARC Artist-in-Residence program , 1999 .

[11]  F. R. Rubia Vila.  [About creativity]. , 2019, Anales de la Real Academia Nacional de Medicina.

[12]  M. Dodgson,et al.  Think, Play, Do: Technology, Innovation, and Organization , 2005 .

[13]  B. García.  URBAN REGENERATION, ARTS PROGRAMMING AND MAJOR EVENTS , 2004 .

[14]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships , 2002 .

[15]  Lisanne Gibson.  Managing the People: Art Programs in the American Depression , 2002 .

[16]  Merja Heikkinen.  ADMINISTRATIVE DEFINITIONS OF ARTISTS IN THE NORDIC MODEL OF STATE SUPPORT FOR ARTISTS , 2005 .

[17]  H. Nyström.  The Postmodern Challenge – From Economic to Creative Management , 2000 .

[18]  Robert Lawrence Kuhn.  Generating creativity and innovation in large bureaucracies , 1993 .

[19]  Music and Society: The Politics of Composition, Performance and Reception , 1989 .

[20]  George Ritzer,et al.  Enchanting a disenchanted world : revolutionizing the means of consumption , 1999 .

[21]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[22]  Stephen Linstead,et al.  The Aesthetics of Organization , 2000 .

[23]  Gerald L. Bruns,et al.  Theory of prose , 1990 .

[24]  Mauro F. Guillén,et al.  Scientific Management's Lost Aesthetic: Architecture, Organization, and the Taylorized Beauty of the Mechanical , 1997 .

[25]  N. Adler.  The Arts & Leadership: Now That We Can Do Anything, What Will We Do? , 2006 .

[26]  Paul DiMaggio.  Classification in Art. , 1987 .

[27]  T. Osborne.  Against ‘creativity’: a philistine rant , 2003 .

[28]  Creativity and play: A systematic approach to managing innovation , 1994 .

[29]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity , 1996 .

[30]  J. V. Delinder.  Taylorism, Managerial Control Strategies, and the Ballets of Balanchine and Stravinsky , 2005 .

[31]  Nancy Harding,et al.  The Aesthetics of Organization , 2001 .

[32]  Alan Bryman,et al.  The Disneyization of Society , 1999 .

[33]  C. Shalley,et al.  WHAT LEADERS NEED TO KNOW: A REVIEW OF SOCIAL AND CONTEXTUAL FACTORS THAT CAN FOSTER OR HINDER CREATIVITY , 2004 .

[34]  Richard A. Lanham,et al.  The `Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information , 2006 .

[35]  Chuihua Judy Chung,et al.  Harvard Design School Guide to Shopping , 2000 .

[36]  S. Roodhouse.  The Unreliability of Cultural Management Information: Defining the Visual Arts , 2006 .

[37]  Jonathan E. Schroeder.  Pierre Guillet de Monthoux: The Art Firm: Aesthetic Management and Metaphysical Marketing from Wagner to Wilson , 2004 .

[38]  Constantine Andriopoulos,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF ORGANISATIONAL CREATIVITY: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2001 .

[39]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivating Creativity in Organizations: On Doing What You Love and Loving What You Do , 1997 .

[40]  Peter M. Ginter,et al.  Motion Study in Management and the Arts , 2001 .

[41]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Team play: Heedful interrelating as the boundary for innovation , 2004 .

[42]  M. Basadur.  Leading others to think innovatively together: Creative leadership , 2004 .

[43]  Paul Jeffcutt,et al.  Management and the creative industries , 2000 .

[44]  L. Pil.  The Rise of the Creative Class , 2004 .

[45]  N. Luhmann,et al.  Art as a Social System , 2000 .

[46]  T. Gieryn.  Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .